232
25 -
20I S -
>V
H . KLOMP
-
CL
25IJ.
20 -
5L 2
-
I 5
15h 2
1957
O.~O/SQ.M.
Ib 2 4
MOTHS PER SQ.M.
5
MOTHS
h ? L
ER SQ.M.
1962
2.l/SQ.M.
I 5 l
10
5
0 2 4
0
2
4
FIQ. 9. Top graphs. Distributiqn of the number of moths/m* in years with low, intermediate and high density. Bottom graphs: Poisson distributions with the same means aa
in the top graphs, given for comparison. See the text and the Tables X and XI.
to the observed distributions (Table XI, and Fig. 9). Where this fit
could be tested with the X2-method no significant differences could be
shown to exist. Even in 1961, where cis outside the 95% range (Table X),
there is no significant deviation with the Poisson distribution.
25 -
20I S -
>V
H . KLOMP
-
CL
25IJ.
20 -
5L 2
-
I 5
15h 2
1957
O.~O/SQ.M.
Ib 2 4
MOTHS PER SQ.M.
5
MOTHS
h ? L
ER SQ.M.
1962
2.l/SQ.M.
I 5 l
10
5
0 2 4
0
2
4
FIQ. 9. Top graphs. Distributiqn of the number of moths/m* in years with low, intermediate and high density. Bottom graphs: Poisson distributions with the same means aa
in the top graphs, given for comparison. See the text and the Tables X and XI.
to the observed distributions (Table XI, and Fig. 9). Where this fit
could be tested with the X2-method no significant differences could be
shown to exist. Even in 1961, where cis outside the 95% range (Table X),
there is no significant deviation with the Poisson distribution.