296
W. W. WILLMARTH AND 5. S. LU
Measurements of sampled but unsorted values of ( u v ) at greater distances
from the wall (both downstream and to the side of the u, wire) show that the
magnitude of the peak in
the wall or spanwise at a fixed downstream dstion from the u, win. The
decrease in magnitude of the peak is also obrlarvr#l as one travels downstream at a fixed distance &om tbc wall. From those more extensive measurcments of (uu)/TiB (aee Lu and Willmarth, 1972)it is apparent that the burst
events am confined to a narrow region in tbc 8panWioe direction near
the wall and downstream from the u , , wire.
I
I
I
(a)
FIG. 6. Convection and decay olwnpled sorted Rcyndcb ctrt~~. (uu,)/&,
with sampling
conditions of uw/uL = + 1, positive slope; y/&* r 0.169, r/&* p: 0, and U, 1 20 R/s; (a)-(e)
same as Fig. 5 (with permhion of J . Fluid Mcck.).
The convection of sweep related events detected with the sampling criterion that u, = 6 with p f t i v e slope was a h studied. The sampled sorted
Reynolds stress from swatps (uu,)j%i7 arc displayed in Fig. 6 in the same
format as used for Fig. S and at the same dintmas downstream and from the
wall. The behavior of t b tdagnftude ofthe pssfr in
of the burst events; it dcasescs tts OM! travdu outward from the wall or
downstream at a fixed distance from the wall. Tha specd of convection of the
W. W. WILLMARTH AND 5. S. LU
Measurements of sampled but unsorted values of ( u v ) at greater distances
from the wall (both downstream and to the side of the u, wire) show that the
magnitude of the peak in
decrease in magnitude of the peak is also obrlarvr#l as one travels downstream at a fixed distance &om tbc wall. From those more extensive measurcments of (uu)/TiB (aee Lu and Willmarth, 1972)it is apparent that the burst
events am confined to a narrow region in tbc 8panWioe direction near
the wall and downstream from the u , , wire.
I
I
I
(a)
FIG. 6. Convection and decay olwnpled sorted Rcyndcb ctrt~~. (uu,)/&,
with sampling
conditions of uw/uL = + 1, positive slope; y/&* r 0.169, r/&* p: 0, and U, 1 20 R/s; (a)-(e)
same as Fig. 5 (with permhion of J . Fluid Mcck.).
The convection of sweep related events detected with the sampling criterion that u, = 6 with p f t i v e slope was a h studied. The sampled sorted
Reynolds stress from swatps (uu,)j%i7 arc displayed in Fig. 6 in the same
format as used for Fig. S and at the same dintmas downstream and from the
wall. The behavior of t b tdagnftude ofthe pssfr in
downstream at a fixed distance from the wall. Tha specd of convection of the
