0
2
I
c
.
c
0
B.
d
i o
j d
a
0
t
d
0
CI
d
0
0
1. 0
t O
1 0
4.0
Y/L
d d O
FIG. 2. In Figs. 2-8, the experimental points are those of Townsend (1956) scaled from the
published graphs. renormalized and machine plotted. The solid line is machine plotted from the
calculated points, approximately 80 per figure. with linear interpolation. The mean
velwity-dekct profile.
I
I
1
d ao
1. 0
2.0
1 0
+. 0
Y/L
IK;. 3. ‘Ihc Reynolds sircss. In the tielf-preserving state. this can be ohtained directly From
thc first moment of the meat1 velocity-dcfect profile. Townsend’s values arc not quite
self-prewving. l h c constunt of proportionality determines the growth; our wake IS growing
somewha1 slower than Townsend’s. All turbulent qunntities normulized by the mean velocity
defca iit the origin.
2
I
c
.
c
0
B.
d
i o
j d
a
0
t
d
0
CI
d
0
0
1. 0
t O
1 0
4.0
Y/L
d d O
FIG. 2. In Figs. 2-8, the experimental points are those of Townsend (1956) scaled from the
published graphs. renormalized and machine plotted. The solid line is machine plotted from the
calculated points, approximately 80 per figure. with linear interpolation. The mean
velwity-dekct profile.
I
I
1
d ao
1. 0
2.0
1 0
+. 0
Y/L
IK;. 3. ‘Ihc Reynolds sircss. In the tielf-preserving state. this can be ohtained directly From
thc first moment of the meat1 velocity-dcfect profile. Townsend’s values arc not quite
self-prewving. l h c constunt of proportionality determines the growth; our wake IS growing
somewha1 slower than Townsend’s. All turbulent qunntities normulized by the mean velocity
defca iit the origin.
