116
RF
category
Socio-professional
organisations, and civil
society
Influence/Dependence
The least influential (max) -
Medium dependency
Competitiveness vector
0,06
Net Scale of influence
-517
Actors
Real profile
M
category
Socio-professional
organisations, and civil society
Influence/Depende
nce
The most influential - the least
dependent after NCGS
Competitiveness
vector
3,31
Net Scale of
influence
1139
NCGS
category
Administrations
Influence/Depende
nce
Very influential - the least
dependent
Competitiveness
vector
2,76
Net Scale of
influence
957
MICLA
T
category
Administrations
Influence/Depende
nce
The most influential after M -
Average dependency (after the
axis)
Competitiveness
vector
2,45
Net Scale of
influence
710
MF
category
Administrations
Influence/Depende
nce
As dependent as NCGS - very
influential
Competitiveness
vector
1,76
Net Scale of
influence
367
MIM
category
Administrations
Influence/Depende
nce
Low dependency - Influential
Competitiveness
vector
1,75
Net Scale of
influence
549
MFFP
category
Administrations
Influence/Depende
nce
Very dependent - Very
influential (3rd place)
Competitiveness
vector
1,62
Net Scale of
influence
165
ME
category
Administrations
Influence/Depende
nce
Very dependent - Very
influential (4th place)
Competitiveness
vector
1,6
Net Scale of
influence
198
DTVE
category
Administrations
Influence/Depende
nce
The least dependent after
NCGS - low influence
Competitiveness
vector
1,42
Net Scale of
influence
481
MTA
category
Administrations
Influence/Depende
nce
low dependency - medium
influence (on axis)
Competitiveness
vector
1,42
Net Scale of
influence
414
HTC
category
Economic operators
Influence/Depende
nce
Low dependency - medium
influence
Competitiveness
vector
1,34
Net Scale of
influence
383
BMUA
category
Scientists
Influence/Depende
nce
Low dependency - medium
influence
Competitiveness
vector
1,25
Net Scale of
influence
362
OU
category
Scientists
Influence/Depende
nce
Low dependency - medium
influence (same position as
UBMA)
Competitiveness
vector
1,25
Net Scale of
influence
362
WA
category
Local authorities
Influence/Depende
nce
Very dependent - moderately
influential
Competitiveness
vector
1,02
Net Scale of
influence
-8
FATC
category
Scientists
Influence/Depende
nce
Low dependency - low
influence
Competitiveness
vector
1
Net Scale of
influence
300
FPS
category
Economic operators
Influence/Depende
nce
Very dependent - moderately
influential (on axis) (same
position as FSA)
Competitiveness
vector
0,95
Net Scale of
influence
-90
Précédent

Analysis of the Algerian maritime spatial planning framework applied to the estearn sector - 116/127

Suivant