10
9
8
7
6
5
ET (mm/day)
0
2
4
6
8
(a)
(b)
MODIS
Bowen Tower
SEBAL
Granier
Heat balance
TSEB
Month of year
10
9
8
7
6
5
ET (mm/day)
0
2
4
6
8
MODIS
Tower
SEBAL
TSEB
FIGURE 5.7 Comparison of Tamarix ET at stressed (a, Diablo) and unstressed (b, Slytherin)
by ground and remote sensing methods. Ground methods were Granier and heat balance sap
flow sensors and Bowen ratio flux towers; remote sensing methods were the MODIS VI method
and two thermal-band methods, SEBAL and TSEB.
LESSONS LEARNED FROM THESE AND OTHER CHANGE STUDIES
101
9
8
7
6
5
ET (mm/day)
0
2
4
6
8
(a)
(b)
MODIS
Bowen Tower
SEBAL
Granier
Heat balance
TSEB
Month of year
10
9
8
7
6
5
ET (mm/day)
0
2
4
6
8
MODIS
Tower
SEBAL
TSEB
FIGURE 5.7 Comparison of Tamarix ET at stressed (a, Diablo) and unstressed (b, Slytherin)
by ground and remote sensing methods. Ground methods were Granier and heat balance sap
flow sensors and Bowen ratio flux towers; remote sensing methods were the MODIS VI method
and two thermal-band methods, SEBAL and TSEB.
LESSONS LEARNED FROM THESE AND OTHER CHANGE STUDIES
101