BIBLIOGRAPHIE
75
• Chouikhi A. (2013). Potential applications of marine seaweeds and pharmacological
activities of theirmetabolites: A review. International Congress of the Populations &
Animal Communities:40.
• Chung H.Y., Ang Jr. P.O., Woo Y.S.N., Ma W.C.J. (2005). Additive composition
for feeding aquaculture animals and feed containing the same. US20050011464.
• Cox S., Abu- Ghannam N.,Gupta S. (2010) .Anassessment of the antioxidant and
antimicrobial activity of six species of edible Irish seaweeds . Intrnational Food
Research Journal . 17: 205-220.
Craggs R.J., Sutherland D.C ., Campbell H. (2011). Large-scale Demonstration of
High Rate Algal Ponds with CO2 addition for enhanced Waste water Treatment and
Biofuel Production. In : Proceedings of the 4th Congress of the International Society
for Applied Phycology, June 19-24 2011, Halifax, Canada.
• Cruz-Rivera E ., Hay M.E. (2003). Prey nutritional quality interacts withch
emicaldefenses to affect consumer feeding and fitness. Ecological Monographs, vol.
73(3), p. 483-506.
-D• Darcy V. (1993).Nutritional aspects of the developing use of marine macroalgae for
the human food industry. International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition, Taylor
& Francis, 44, pp. S23-S35.
• Delepine R. (1982). Valorisation et utilisation des algues., Edit Ifremer., Brest : 211p
• Delepine R., Boudouresque C.F. Frada-Orestano., Noilles C., MC et Asensi
A.(1987). Algues et autres végétaux marins. Fiches FAO d'identification des espèces
pour les besoins de la pêche. Révision méditerranée et mer noire, zone de la pêche,
volume I végétaux et invertébrés. FAO, Rome, 136p.
• Données FAO. (2010). Production mondiale des algues in act IFREMER.
• Données FAO. (2014). Production mondiale des algues. France : Ifremer, 120 p.
• Données FAO.(2018). Production mondiale des algues in act IFREMER.
75
• Chouikhi A. (2013). Potential applications of marine seaweeds and pharmacological
activities of theirmetabolites: A review. International Congress of the Populations &
Animal Communities:40.
• Chung H.Y., Ang Jr. P.O., Woo Y.S.N., Ma W.C.J. (2005). Additive composition
for feeding aquaculture animals and feed containing the same. US20050011464.
• Cox S., Abu- Ghannam N.,Gupta S. (2010) .Anassessment of the antioxidant and
antimicrobial activity of six species of edible Irish seaweeds . Intrnational Food
Research Journal . 17: 205-220.
Craggs R.J., Sutherland D.C ., Campbell H. (2011). Large-scale Demonstration of
High Rate Algal Ponds with CO2 addition for enhanced Waste water Treatment and
Biofuel Production. In : Proceedings of the 4th Congress of the International Society
for Applied Phycology, June 19-24 2011, Halifax, Canada.
• Cruz-Rivera E ., Hay M.E. (2003). Prey nutritional quality interacts withch
emicaldefenses to affect consumer feeding and fitness. Ecological Monographs, vol.
73(3), p. 483-506.
-D• Darcy V. (1993).Nutritional aspects of the developing use of marine macroalgae for
the human food industry. International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition, Taylor
& Francis, 44, pp. S23-S35.
• Delepine R. (1982). Valorisation et utilisation des algues., Edit Ifremer., Brest : 211p
• Delepine R., Boudouresque C.F. Frada-Orestano., Noilles C., MC et Asensi
A.(1987). Algues et autres végétaux marins. Fiches FAO d'identification des espèces
pour les besoins de la pêche. Révision méditerranée et mer noire, zone de la pêche,
volume I végétaux et invertébrés. FAO, Rome, 136p.
• Données FAO. (2010). Production mondiale des algues in act IFREMER.
• Données FAO. (2014). Production mondiale des algues. France : Ifremer, 120 p.
• Données FAO.(2018). Production mondiale des algues in act IFREMER.