336
‘
RYTI—IME ET MODALITÉS DE
._
ï
\‘5j__;
differentiation of the post—canine dentition. >> Prod;
;
Zool. Soc. London, Ser. B, 109 (Pt. 1) : 1—36.
_
—
CAMP (Charles—L.) and Natasha-SMITH, 1942. «
_
functions of the digital ligaments of
Mem. Univ. California, 13 : 69—124…
;:r…=
CLARK (A.—H.), 1930. The new evolution.
-
Williams and“lilkins.
_
‘
,
_
,
;
,.
"
fj
-:
'
Corn (E.—P.), 1886. The origin of the fittest. NeW—York, Appleton.
(H.—B.), 1940. Addptive“coloration in_animals. London,
—
Methuen and C°.
-_
'
_CRAMPTON (H.—E.), 1932. «_ Studies on the variation, distribution,
,
_
_
and evolution 'of the genus Partula ; the species
,
‘..
inhabiting Moorea. “>> Pub. Carnegie [inst. Washington,
'
,
N°,
1—335.
: g
,
_
'
_
_CUENOT (L.), 1921. La GenèsedeSrespèèes animales: _Pari‘s‘,,Félix
'
+
1925.
f
,
.
.
'
’DARLINGTON
(C.—D.), 1939. 'The;
Cambridge, CambridgeUnivŒsitÿ‘Pr‘eSS;
,
__
DAVIES (A.—M.), 1937. EvolutionLondon, '
…
Murby.‘
} _’ ?
__;_
..'_ ,
Ÿ_Î__'
DEMEREC (M,), 1933.
gene ‘? <<“ Jour. Hered., 24 :
369—378.
_
:_
,
_
.
_
-
'
'
——
1937. « Frequency of Spontaneous mutations in certain
stocks o_f DrosOphila— melanogasteiu << Genetics, 22
469—478.
"
Â
,
'
_,
,
DENDY (A.), 1912_.«, Momentum in evolution, >> in Report (1911)
'
of the Brit. Assoc. Adv.‘ Sci : 277-280.
DEWAR (D.), 1931. Difficulties of the Evolution Theory. Arnold, .'
_London._
'
_
'
'
.
_,
‘
Dren (Lee R.), 1942. << Ecological, distribution of Peroznyscus
1
and Neotozna in parts of southern NeW Mexico. >>
Ecology, 23 :
;
.
.
-'
».
'
'
_
DOBZHANSKY (T.), 1937. Genetics anthe origin of species. New—
,
York, Columbia University Press.
'
'
_
—
1941. Idem,2eme édition.
,
'
'
,
.
1938. << The raw materials ofevolution. >> Sci. Monthly.
'
46 : 445-449.
_
_
'
—_—
1942. _<<
Biological adaptation. >> Sci… Monthly, 55 :
391—402.
'
»
DOBZHANSKY (T.) and C.C. TAN, 1936. « Studies on hybrid steri—