8 Using Qualitative Information in Query Proc. over Multiresolution Maps
185
3. Boucelma O, Essid M, Lacroix Z (2002) A WFS-based Mediation System for GIS interoperability. In: Voisard A, Chen SC (eds) Proc. of the 10th Int. Symp. on Advances in
GIS. McLean, USA, 23–28
4. Boucelma O, Essid M, Lacroix Z, Vinel J, Garinet J-Y, Betari A (2004) VirGIS: Mediation for Geographical Information Systems. In: Proc. of the 20th Int. Conf. on Data
Engineering. Boston, USA, 855–856
5. Burns HT, Egenhofer MJ (1996) Similarity of Spatial Scenes. In: Kraak MJ, Molenaar
M (eds) Proc. of the 7th Int. Symp. on Spatial Data Handling. Delft, Netherlands, 31–42
6. Clementini E, Di Felice P, Van Oosterom P (1993) A Small Set of Formal Topological
Relationships Suitable for End-User Interaction. In: Abel DJ, Ooi BC (eds) Proc. of the
3rd Int. Symp. on Advances in Spatial Databases. Singapore, Lecture Notes in Computer
Science, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 277–295
7. Egenhofer MJ, Al-Taha K (1992) Reasoning about Gradual Changes of Topological
Relationships. In: Frank AU, Campari I, Formentini U (eds) Proc. of the Int. Conf.
GIS From Space to Territory: Theories and Methods of Spatio-Temporal Reasoning.
Pisa, Italy, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York,
196–219
8. Egenhofer MJ, Clementini E, Di Felice P (1994) Evaluating Inconsistency Among Multiple Representations. In: Waugh TC, Healey RG (eds) Proc. of the 6th Int. Symp. on
Spatial Data Handling. Edinburgh, Scotland, 901–920
9. Egenhofer MJ, Franzosa RD (2001) Point-set Topological Spatial Relations. Int. Journal
of Geographic Information Systems, 5(2):161–174
10. Egenhofer MJ, Herring J (1990) Categorizing Binary Topological Relations Between
Regions, Lines and Points in Geographic Databases. Technical Report, Department of
Surveying Engineering, University of Maine, USA
11. Egenhofer MJ, Mark D (1995) Modeling Conceptual Neighborhoods of Topological
Line-Region Relations. Int. Journal of Geographic Information Systems, 9(5):555–565
12. Goyal RK, Egenhofer MJ (2000) Consistent Queries over Cardinal Directions across
Different Levels of Detail. In: Ibrahim MT, K—ng J, Revell N (eds) Proc. of 11th Int.
Conf. on Database and Expert System Applications. Greenwich, London, UK, 876–880
13. Goyal RK (2000) Similarity Assessment for Cardinal Directions Between Extended Spatial Objects. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Spatial Information Science and Engineering,
University of Maine, USA
14. OGC (OpenGeoSpatial Consortium) (1999) OpenGIS Simple Features Specification for
SQL, www.opengeospatial.org/docs/99-049.pdf
15. Puppo E, Dettori G (1995) Towards a Formal Model for Multiresolution Spatial Maps.
In: Egenhofer MJ, Herring JR (eds) Proc. of the 4th Int. Symp. on Advances in Spatial
Databases. Portland, Maine, USA, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, Berlin
Heidelberg New York, 152–169
16. Skiadopoulos S, Koubarakis M (2002) Consistency Checking for Qualitative Spatial Reasoning with Cardinal Direction. In: Proc. of the 8th Int. Conf. on Principles and Practice
of Constraint Programming. Itahca, NY, USA, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence,
Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 341–355
17. Skiadopoulos S, Koubarakis M (2004) Composing Cardinal Direction Relations. Artificial Intelligence, 152(2):537–561
18. Tryfona N, Egenhofer MJ (1996) Multi-Resolution Spatial Databases: Consistency
Among Networks. In: Conrad S, Klein HJ, Schewe KD (eds) Proc. of the 6th Int.
Work. on Foundations of Models and Languages for Data and Objects. Schloss Dagstuhl,
Germany, 119–132
Précédent

- 179/317

Suivant