313
16 A Network Perspective on Governing Interactions
network analysis tools. These analyses can reveal a tremendous amount about system characteristics, identifying missing or weak links or showing how power is
distributed within the system. These fi ndings can guide interventions to create or
strengthen governing interactions.
Acknowledgements This contribution has been developed through: (1) The MarGov Project at
CERMES, Marine Resource Governance in the Eastern Caribbean, supported by the International
Development Research Centre, Ottawa, Canada; and (2) The PROGOVNET Project at Dalhousie
University, Halifax, Canada and CERMES, ‘Strengthening Principled Ocean Governance Networks –
Transferring Lessons from the Caribbean to the Wider Ocean Governance Community’Supported
by The Nippon Foundation of Japan.
References
Barabasi, A.L. (2002). Linked. New York: Plume.
Bavinck, M., Chuenpagdee, R., Diallo, M., van der Heijden, P., Kooiman, J., Mahon, R., Williams,
S. (2005). Interactive governance for fi sheries: A guide to better practice. Delft: Eburon
Academic Publishers.
Bodin, Ö., & Crona, B.I. (2009). The role of social networks in natural resource governance: What
relational patterns make a difference? Global Environmental Change, 19, 366–374.
Bodin, Ö., & Prell, C. (Eds.). (2011). Social networks and natural resource management:
Uncovering the social fabric of resource governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Borgatti, S.P., Everett, M.G., Freeman, L.C. (2002). UCINET for Windows: Software for social
network analysis. Harvard: Analytic Technologies.
Brandes, U., & Wagner, D. (2004). Visone - Analysis and visualization of social networks. In M.
Jünger, P. Mutzel, Graph drawing software (pp. 321–340). New York: Springer.
Cross R., & Parker, A. (2004). The hidden power of social networks: Understanding how work
really gets done in organizations. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Jorgensen, D.J. (2004). Networking to meet the demands of youth: An analysis of communications
networks among Nueces County Youth Service Organisations. Southwestern Social Science
Conference (17 pp). Corpus Christi, Texas.
Kooiman, J., Bavinck, M., Jentoft, S., Pullin, R. (Eds.). (2005). Fish for life: Interactive governance
for fi sheries. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam Press.
Kooiman, J., Bavinck, M., Chuenpagdee, R., Mahon, R., Pullin, R. (2008). Interactive governance
and governability: An introduction. The Journal of Transdisciplinary Environmental Studies,
7(1), 1–11.
Mahon, R. (2008). Assessing governability of fi sheries using the interactive governance approach:
Preliminary examples from the Caribbean. The Journal of Transdisciplinary Environmental
Studies, 7(1), 1-12.
Mahon, R., Bavinck, M., Roy, R. (2005). Chapter 17: Fisheries governance in action. In J. Kooiman,
M. Bavinck, S. Jentoft, R. Pullin (Eds.), Fish for life: Interactive governance for fi sheries
(pp. 353–378). Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam Press.
Mahon, R., Blackman, K., Lee, R., McConney, P. (2010). Assessing social network structure of
stakeholder organisations in the Grenadine Islands. CERMES Technical Report No.31.
Mohrman, S.A., Galbraith, J.R., Monge, P. (2006). Network attributes impacting the generation and
fl ow of knowledge within and from the basic science community. In J. Hage, & M. Meeus (Eds.),
Innovation, science and industrial change: The handbook of research (pp. 196–216). London:
Oxford Press.
Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding institutional diversity. Bloomington: Princeton University
Press.
16 A Network Perspective on Governing Interactions
network analysis tools. These analyses can reveal a tremendous amount about system characteristics, identifying missing or weak links or showing how power is
distributed within the system. These fi ndings can guide interventions to create or
strengthen governing interactions.
Acknowledgements This contribution has been developed through: (1) The MarGov Project at
CERMES, Marine Resource Governance in the Eastern Caribbean, supported by the International
Development Research Centre, Ottawa, Canada; and (2) The PROGOVNET Project at Dalhousie
University, Halifax, Canada and CERMES, ‘Strengthening Principled Ocean Governance Networks –
Transferring Lessons from the Caribbean to the Wider Ocean Governance Community’Supported
by The Nippon Foundation of Japan.
References
Barabasi, A.L. (2002). Linked. New York: Plume.
Bavinck, M., Chuenpagdee, R., Diallo, M., van der Heijden, P., Kooiman, J., Mahon, R., Williams,
S. (2005). Interactive governance for fi sheries: A guide to better practice. Delft: Eburon
Academic Publishers.
Bodin, Ö., & Crona, B.I. (2009). The role of social networks in natural resource governance: What
relational patterns make a difference? Global Environmental Change, 19, 366–374.
Bodin, Ö., & Prell, C. (Eds.). (2011). Social networks and natural resource management:
Uncovering the social fabric of resource governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Borgatti, S.P., Everett, M.G., Freeman, L.C. (2002). UCINET for Windows: Software for social
network analysis. Harvard: Analytic Technologies.
Brandes, U., & Wagner, D. (2004). Visone - Analysis and visualization of social networks. In M.
Jünger, P. Mutzel, Graph drawing software (pp. 321–340). New York: Springer.
Cross R., & Parker, A. (2004). The hidden power of social networks: Understanding how work
really gets done in organizations. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Jorgensen, D.J. (2004). Networking to meet the demands of youth: An analysis of communications
networks among Nueces County Youth Service Organisations. Southwestern Social Science
Conference (17 pp). Corpus Christi, Texas.
Kooiman, J., Bavinck, M., Jentoft, S., Pullin, R. (Eds.). (2005). Fish for life: Interactive governance
for fi sheries. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam Press.
Kooiman, J., Bavinck, M., Chuenpagdee, R., Mahon, R., Pullin, R. (2008). Interactive governance
and governability: An introduction. The Journal of Transdisciplinary Environmental Studies,
7(1), 1–11.
Mahon, R. (2008). Assessing governability of fi sheries using the interactive governance approach:
Preliminary examples from the Caribbean. The Journal of Transdisciplinary Environmental
Studies, 7(1), 1-12.
Mahon, R., Bavinck, M., Roy, R. (2005). Chapter 17: Fisheries governance in action. In J. Kooiman,
M. Bavinck, S. Jentoft, R. Pullin (Eds.), Fish for life: Interactive governance for fi sheries
(pp. 353–378). Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam Press.
Mahon, R., Blackman, K., Lee, R., McConney, P. (2010). Assessing social network structure of
stakeholder organisations in the Grenadine Islands. CERMES Technical Report No.31.
Mohrman, S.A., Galbraith, J.R., Monge, P. (2006). Network attributes impacting the generation and
fl ow of knowledge within and from the basic science community. In J. Hage, & M. Meeus (Eds.),
Innovation, science and industrial change: The handbook of research (pp. 196–216). London:
Oxford Press.
Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding institutional diversity. Bloomington: Princeton University
Press.