133
the river as an ecosystem that may not meet their ideals of natural beauty, but may
nonetheless be fully functional.
If we want river ecosystem services and sustainable water resources, we must
manage rivers as ecosystems and, for this, diverse sectors of the scientific community and the greater society must work together.
References
Abbe T, Brooks A (2011) Geomorphic, engineering and ecological considerations when using
wood in river restoration. In: Simon A, Bennett SJ, Castro JM (eds) Stream restoration in
dynamic fluvial systems: scientific approaches, analyses, and tools. American Geophysical
Union Press, Washington, pp 419–451
Andrews ED, Nankervis JM (1995) Effective discharge and the design of channel maintenance
flows for gravel-bed rivers. In: Costa JE et al (eds) Natural and anthropogenic influences in
fluvial geomorphology. American Geophysical Union, Washington, pp 151–164
Ansar A, Flyvbjerg B, Budzier A, Lunn D (2014) Should we build more large dams? The actual
costs of hydropower megaproject development. Energ Policy 69:43–56
Arthington AH, Pusey BJ (2003) Flow restoration and protection in Australian rivers. River Res
Appl 19:377–395
Arthington AH, Bunn SE, Poff NL, Naiman RJ (2006) The challenge of providing environmental
flow rules to sustain river ecosystems. Ecol Appl 16(4):1311–1318
Baker ME, Weller DE, Jordan TE (2006) Improved methods for quantifying potential nutrient
interception by riparian buffers. Landsc Ecol 21:1327–1345
Balana BB, Vinten A, Slee B (2011) A review on cost-effectiveness of agri-environmental measures related to the EU WFD: key issues, methods, and applications. Ecol Econ 70:1021–1031
Bednarek AT (2001) Undamming rivers: a review of the ecological impacts of dam removal.
Environ Manag 27:803–814
Beechie TJ, Sear DA, Olden JD, Pess GR, Buffington JM, Moir H, Roni P, Pollock MM (2010)
Process-based principles for restoring river ecosystems. Bioscience 60:209–222
Bellmore JR, Baxter CV (2014) Effects of geomorphic process domains on river ecosystems: a
comparison of floodplain and confined valley segments. River Res Appl 30:617–630
Bernhardt ES, Palmer MA (2011) River restoration—the fuzzy logic of repairing reaches to reverse
watershed-scale degradation. Ecol Appl 21:1926–1931
Bernhardt ES, Palmer MA, Allan JD, and the National River Restoration Science Synthesis
Working Group (2005) Restoration of U.S. rivers: a national synthesis. Science 308:636–637
Bernhardt ES et al (2007) Restoring rivers one reach at a time: results from a survey of U.S. river
restoration practitioners. Restor Ecol 15:482–493
Bloesch J, Sieber U (2003) The morphological destruction and subsequent restoration programmes
of large rivers in Europe. Arch Hydrobiol Suppl 147:363–385
Botterweg T, Rodda DW (1999) Danube River basin: progress with the environmental programme.
Water Sci Technol 40:1–8
Boulton AJ (1999) An overview of river health assessment: philosophies, practice, problems and
prognosis. Freshw Biol 41:469–479
Bovee KD, Milhous R (1978) Hydraulic simulation in instream flow studies: theory and techniques. Instream Flow Information Paper no. 5, FWS/OBS-78/33, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, Fort Collins, Colorado
Brierley GJ, Fryirs K (2000) River styles, a geomorphic approach to catchment characterization:
implications for river rehabilitation in Bega catchment, New South Wales, Australia. Environ
Manag 25:661–679
References
the river as an ecosystem that may not meet their ideals of natural beauty, but may
nonetheless be fully functional.
If we want river ecosystem services and sustainable water resources, we must
manage rivers as ecosystems and, for this, diverse sectors of the scientific community and the greater society must work together.
References
Abbe T, Brooks A (2011) Geomorphic, engineering and ecological considerations when using
wood in river restoration. In: Simon A, Bennett SJ, Castro JM (eds) Stream restoration in
dynamic fluvial systems: scientific approaches, analyses, and tools. American Geophysical
Union Press, Washington, pp 419–451
Andrews ED, Nankervis JM (1995) Effective discharge and the design of channel maintenance
flows for gravel-bed rivers. In: Costa JE et al (eds) Natural and anthropogenic influences in
fluvial geomorphology. American Geophysical Union, Washington, pp 151–164
Ansar A, Flyvbjerg B, Budzier A, Lunn D (2014) Should we build more large dams? The actual
costs of hydropower megaproject development. Energ Policy 69:43–56
Arthington AH, Pusey BJ (2003) Flow restoration and protection in Australian rivers. River Res
Appl 19:377–395
Arthington AH, Bunn SE, Poff NL, Naiman RJ (2006) The challenge of providing environmental
flow rules to sustain river ecosystems. Ecol Appl 16(4):1311–1318
Baker ME, Weller DE, Jordan TE (2006) Improved methods for quantifying potential nutrient
interception by riparian buffers. Landsc Ecol 21:1327–1345
Balana BB, Vinten A, Slee B (2011) A review on cost-effectiveness of agri-environmental measures related to the EU WFD: key issues, methods, and applications. Ecol Econ 70:1021–1031
Bednarek AT (2001) Undamming rivers: a review of the ecological impacts of dam removal.
Environ Manag 27:803–814
Beechie TJ, Sear DA, Olden JD, Pess GR, Buffington JM, Moir H, Roni P, Pollock MM (2010)
Process-based principles for restoring river ecosystems. Bioscience 60:209–222
Bellmore JR, Baxter CV (2014) Effects of geomorphic process domains on river ecosystems: a
comparison of floodplain and confined valley segments. River Res Appl 30:617–630
Bernhardt ES, Palmer MA (2011) River restoration—the fuzzy logic of repairing reaches to reverse
watershed-scale degradation. Ecol Appl 21:1926–1931
Bernhardt ES, Palmer MA, Allan JD, and the National River Restoration Science Synthesis
Working Group (2005) Restoration of U.S. rivers: a national synthesis. Science 308:636–637
Bernhardt ES et al (2007) Restoring rivers one reach at a time: results from a survey of U.S. river
restoration practitioners. Restor Ecol 15:482–493
Bloesch J, Sieber U (2003) The morphological destruction and subsequent restoration programmes
of large rivers in Europe. Arch Hydrobiol Suppl 147:363–385
Botterweg T, Rodda DW (1999) Danube River basin: progress with the environmental programme.
Water Sci Technol 40:1–8
Boulton AJ (1999) An overview of river health assessment: philosophies, practice, problems and
prognosis. Freshw Biol 41:469–479
Bovee KD, Milhous R (1978) Hydraulic simulation in instream flow studies: theory and techniques. Instream Flow Information Paper no. 5, FWS/OBS-78/33, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, Fort Collins, Colorado
Brierley GJ, Fryirs K (2000) River styles, a geomorphic approach to catchment characterization:
implications for river rehabilitation in Bega catchment, New South Wales, Australia. Environ
Manag 25:661–679
References