Mayr E (1982) The Growth of Biological Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard
University Press.
Mello CV, Vicario DS, Clayton DF (1992) Song presentation induces gene expression in the songbird forebrain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 89:6818–6822.
Michelsen A (1998) Biophysics of sound localization in insects. In: Hoy RR, Popper
AN, Fay RR (eds) Comparative Hearing: Insects. New York: Springer, pp.
18–62.
Michelsen A, Larsen ON (1983) Strategies for acoustic communication in complex
environments. In: Huber F, Markl H (eds) Neuroethology and Behavioral Physiology. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 321–331.
Morton ES (1975) Ecological sources of selection on avian sounds. Am Nat
109:17–34.
Morton ES (1977) On the occurrence and significance of motivational structural
rules in some bird and mammal sounds. Am Nat 111:855–869.
Murphy CG (1994a) Determinants of chorus tenure in the barking tree frogs (Hyla
gratiosa). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 34:285–295.
Murphy CG (1994b) Chorus tenure of male barking tree frogs, Hyla gratiosa. Anim
Behav 48:763–777.
Murphy CG (1999) Nightly timing of chorusing by male barking tree frogs
(Hyla gratiosa): The influence of female arrival and energy. Copeia 1999:
333–347.
Nevo E, Capranica RR (1985) Evolutionary origin of ethological reproductive isolation in cricket frogs, Acris. Evol Biol 19:147–214.
Nottebohm F (1975) Continental patterns of song variability in Zonotrichia capensis: Some possible ecological correlates. Am Nat 109:116–140.
Owens DH, Morton ES (1998) Animal Vocal Communication: A New Approach.
Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Penna M, Solis R (1996) Frog call intensities and sound propagation in the South
American temperate forest region. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 42:371–381.
Phelps SM, Ryan MJ (1998) Neural networks predict response biases in female
túngara frogs. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 265:279–285.
Phelps SM, Ryan MJ (2000) History influences signal recognition: Neural network
models of túngara frogs. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 267:1633–1639.
Pijl L, Dodson CH (1966) Orchid Flowers. Their Pollination and Evolution. Coral
Gables, FL: University of Miami Press.
Pinker S (1994) The Language Instinct. New York: William Morrow Co.
Pomiankowski AN (1988) The evolution of female mate preferences for male
genetic quality. Oxford Surv Evol Biol 5:136–184.
Prestwich KN (1988) Intra-specific variation in the energetic efficiency of sound
production in crickets. Am Zool 28:103A.
Prestwich KN, Brugger KE, Topping M (1989) Energy and communication in three
species of hylid frogs: Power input, power output and efficiency. J Exp Biol
144:53–80.
Prestwich KN, Walker TJ (1981) Energetics of singing in crickets: Effect of
temperature in three trilling species (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). J Comp Physiol
143:199–212.
Proctor HC (1991) Courtship in the water mite Neumania papillator: Males capitalize on female adaptations for predation. Anim Behav 42:589–598.
270
M.J. Ryan and N.M. Kime
University Press.
Mello CV, Vicario DS, Clayton DF (1992) Song presentation induces gene expression in the songbird forebrain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 89:6818–6822.
Michelsen A (1998) Biophysics of sound localization in insects. In: Hoy RR, Popper
AN, Fay RR (eds) Comparative Hearing: Insects. New York: Springer, pp.
18–62.
Michelsen A, Larsen ON (1983) Strategies for acoustic communication in complex
environments. In: Huber F, Markl H (eds) Neuroethology and Behavioral Physiology. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 321–331.
Morton ES (1975) Ecological sources of selection on avian sounds. Am Nat
109:17–34.
Morton ES (1977) On the occurrence and significance of motivational structural
rules in some bird and mammal sounds. Am Nat 111:855–869.
Murphy CG (1994a) Determinants of chorus tenure in the barking tree frogs (Hyla
gratiosa). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 34:285–295.
Murphy CG (1994b) Chorus tenure of male barking tree frogs, Hyla gratiosa. Anim
Behav 48:763–777.
Murphy CG (1999) Nightly timing of chorusing by male barking tree frogs
(Hyla gratiosa): The influence of female arrival and energy. Copeia 1999:
333–347.
Nevo E, Capranica RR (1985) Evolutionary origin of ethological reproductive isolation in cricket frogs, Acris. Evol Biol 19:147–214.
Nottebohm F (1975) Continental patterns of song variability in Zonotrichia capensis: Some possible ecological correlates. Am Nat 109:116–140.
Owens DH, Morton ES (1998) Animal Vocal Communication: A New Approach.
Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Penna M, Solis R (1996) Frog call intensities and sound propagation in the South
American temperate forest region. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 42:371–381.
Phelps SM, Ryan MJ (1998) Neural networks predict response biases in female
túngara frogs. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 265:279–285.
Phelps SM, Ryan MJ (2000) History influences signal recognition: Neural network
models of túngara frogs. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 267:1633–1639.
Pijl L, Dodson CH (1966) Orchid Flowers. Their Pollination and Evolution. Coral
Gables, FL: University of Miami Press.
Pinker S (1994) The Language Instinct. New York: William Morrow Co.
Pomiankowski AN (1988) The evolution of female mate preferences for male
genetic quality. Oxford Surv Evol Biol 5:136–184.
Prestwich KN (1988) Intra-specific variation in the energetic efficiency of sound
production in crickets. Am Zool 28:103A.
Prestwich KN, Brugger KE, Topping M (1989) Energy and communication in three
species of hylid frogs: Power input, power output and efficiency. J Exp Biol
144:53–80.
Prestwich KN, Walker TJ (1981) Energetics of singing in crickets: Effect of
temperature in three trilling species (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). J Comp Physiol
143:199–212.
Proctor HC (1991) Courtship in the water mite Neumania papillator: Males capitalize on female adaptations for predation. Anim Behav 42:589–598.
270
M.J. Ryan and N.M. Kime