Cade WH (1981) Alternative male strategies: Genetic differences in crickets.
Science 212:563–564.
Cannatella DC, Hillis DM, Chippinendale P, Weigt L, Rand AS, Ryan MJ (1998)
Phylogeny of frogs of the Physalaemus pustulosus species group, with an examination of data incongruence. Syst Biol 47:311–335.
Capranica RR (1972) Why auditory neurophysiologists should be more interested
in animal sound communication. Physiologist 15:55–60.
Capranica RR, Frishkopf LS, Nevo E (1973) Encoding of geographic dialects in the
auditory system of the cricket frog. Science 182:1272–1275.
Catchpole CK, Slater PJB (1995) Bird Song, Biological Themes and Variation.
Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Christy JH (1995) Mimicry, mate choice, and the sensory trap hypothesis. Am Nat
146:171–181.
Dabelsteen T, Larsen ON, Pederson SB (1993) Habitat-induced degradation of
sound signals: Quantifying the effects of communication sounds and bird location
on blur ratio, excess attenuation, and signal-to-noise ratio in blackbird song.
J Acoust Soc Am 93:2206–2220.
Davies NB, Kilner RM, Noble DG (1998) Nestling cuckoos, Cuculus canorus, exploit hosts with begging calls that mimic a brood. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci
265:673–678.
Dawkins MS, Guilford T (1996) Sensory bias and adaptiveness of female choice. Am
Nat 148:937–942.
Doherty JA, Gerhardt HC (1983) Hybrid tree frogs: Vocalizations of males and
selective phonotaxis. Science 220:1078–1080.
Doherty JA, Hoy RR (1985) Communication in insects III. The auditory behavior
of crickets: Some views of genetic coupling, song recognition, and predator detection. Q Rev Biol 60:453–472.
Drewry GE, Rand AS (1983) Characteristics of an acoustic community: Puerto
Rican frogs of the genus Eleutherodactylus. Copeia 1983:941–953.
Duellman WE (1967) Courtship isolating mechanisms in Costa Rican hylid frogs.
Herpetologica 23:169–183.
Eberhard LS (1994) Oxygen consumption during singing by male Carolina wrens
(Thryothorus ludovicianus). Auk 111:124–130.
Endler JA (1992) Signals, signal conditions, and the direction of evolution. Am Nat
139:S125–S153.
Endler JA, Basolo AL (1998) Sensory ecology, receiver biases, and sexual selection.
Trends Ecol Evol 13:415–420.
Enquist M,Arak A (1998) Neural representation and the evolution of signal form. In:
Dukas R (ed) Cognitive Ecology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 21–87.
Ewing AM (1989) Arthropod Bioacoustics, Neurobiology and Behavior. Ithaca, NY:
Cornell University Press.
Fisher RA (1930) The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Oxford: Clarendon
Press.
Foster SA (1999) The geography of behaviour: An evolutionary perspective. Trends
Ecol Evol 14:190–195.
Foster SA, Endler JA (eds) (1999) Geographic Variation in Behavior. Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
Fritzsch B, Ryan M, Wilczynski W, Walkowiak W, Hetherington T (eds) (1988) The
Evolution of the Amphibian Auditory System. New York: John Wiley and Sons Inc.
5. Selection on Signals
267
Science 212:563–564.
Cannatella DC, Hillis DM, Chippinendale P, Weigt L, Rand AS, Ryan MJ (1998)
Phylogeny of frogs of the Physalaemus pustulosus species group, with an examination of data incongruence. Syst Biol 47:311–335.
Capranica RR (1972) Why auditory neurophysiologists should be more interested
in animal sound communication. Physiologist 15:55–60.
Capranica RR, Frishkopf LS, Nevo E (1973) Encoding of geographic dialects in the
auditory system of the cricket frog. Science 182:1272–1275.
Catchpole CK, Slater PJB (1995) Bird Song, Biological Themes and Variation.
Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Christy JH (1995) Mimicry, mate choice, and the sensory trap hypothesis. Am Nat
146:171–181.
Dabelsteen T, Larsen ON, Pederson SB (1993) Habitat-induced degradation of
sound signals: Quantifying the effects of communication sounds and bird location
on blur ratio, excess attenuation, and signal-to-noise ratio in blackbird song.
J Acoust Soc Am 93:2206–2220.
Davies NB, Kilner RM, Noble DG (1998) Nestling cuckoos, Cuculus canorus, exploit hosts with begging calls that mimic a brood. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci
265:673–678.
Dawkins MS, Guilford T (1996) Sensory bias and adaptiveness of female choice. Am
Nat 148:937–942.
Doherty JA, Gerhardt HC (1983) Hybrid tree frogs: Vocalizations of males and
selective phonotaxis. Science 220:1078–1080.
Doherty JA, Hoy RR (1985) Communication in insects III. The auditory behavior
of crickets: Some views of genetic coupling, song recognition, and predator detection. Q Rev Biol 60:453–472.
Drewry GE, Rand AS (1983) Characteristics of an acoustic community: Puerto
Rican frogs of the genus Eleutherodactylus. Copeia 1983:941–953.
Duellman WE (1967) Courtship isolating mechanisms in Costa Rican hylid frogs.
Herpetologica 23:169–183.
Eberhard LS (1994) Oxygen consumption during singing by male Carolina wrens
(Thryothorus ludovicianus). Auk 111:124–130.
Endler JA (1992) Signals, signal conditions, and the direction of evolution. Am Nat
139:S125–S153.
Endler JA, Basolo AL (1998) Sensory ecology, receiver biases, and sexual selection.
Trends Ecol Evol 13:415–420.
Enquist M,Arak A (1998) Neural representation and the evolution of signal form. In:
Dukas R (ed) Cognitive Ecology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 21–87.
Ewing AM (1989) Arthropod Bioacoustics, Neurobiology and Behavior. Ithaca, NY:
Cornell University Press.
Fisher RA (1930) The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Oxford: Clarendon
Press.
Foster SA (1999) The geography of behaviour: An evolutionary perspective. Trends
Ecol Evol 14:190–195.
Foster SA, Endler JA (eds) (1999) Geographic Variation in Behavior. Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
Fritzsch B, Ryan M, Wilczynski W, Walkowiak W, Hetherington T (eds) (1988) The
Evolution of the Amphibian Auditory System. New York: John Wiley and Sons Inc.
5. Selection on Signals
267