Allozymic Polymorphism and Phylogeny of the Family Channichthyidae
305
. . . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - T r e m atom Ui lepidorhinus
1----------------------------- C ham p '0 C ep h a In s gun nad
. . . - - - - - - - - - - N eopagetoPGi$ ionah
Pagetopsis m acropterus
PagetopS'is m aculatus
C hion 0 draco Tastro spinellu iii:
Chaenodraco wilsoni
C hannichthys rhinoceratu:!l
Chaenoce-phalus aceratu9
Cryodraco antarcticuB
Fig. 1. The neighbor-joining tree obtained from the Nei [11] genetic distance matrix
. . . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - T re m a tom us lep ido rh in us
..... - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - C ham p so ce p ha Iu s gun n ari
. . . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Neopagetopsis ionah
...-_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 6::..;:.9-1
Pagetopsis m acropterus
Pagetopsis m aculatus
. . . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Chaenodraco wilsoni
L -----t==============_ C hio nod rae 0 ham atu s
C hionodraco rastrospinosus
..... - - - - - - - Chionodraco m yersi
..... - - - - C hannichthys rhinoceratus
Cryodraco antarcticus
C haenocephalus aceratus
Fig. 2. The strict consensus of the two maximum parsimony trees obtained from a Branch
and Bound search using PAUP 3.1.1. Tree length is 66; CI = 0.591; RI = 0.757. Bootstrap
proportions above 50% are indicated (calculated using 1000 replicates)
..... - - - - Cham psocephalus
..... _ _ _ _ Pagetopsis+N eopagetopsis
+ P s e u doc h a e n ie h th Y s
_---c hannichthy s
C hionodraco
Cbaenodraco
C haenocephalus
Chi 0 nob a th y s c u s
C ryodraco
, . . . . - - - - - - - - - - Cham psocephalus
P s e u doc h a e n i c b th y s
, . . . . - - - - - - C hannichthys
..... -----Cryodraco
, . . . - - - C haenoeephalu5
C hionodraco
Chaenodraeo
Fig. 3. Left: Iwami's (1985) c1adogram based on morphological characters. Dacodraco
branching point in the original tree was undetermined. Right: V oskoboinikova' s ( in press)
phenogram based on the global similarity of developmental features. The original tree was
rooted on Cryodraco; it was rerooted here on Champsocephalus for comparison. Original
branch lengths are not presented here
305
. . . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - T r e m atom Ui lepidorhinus
1----------------------------- C ham p '0 C ep h a In s gun nad
. . . - - - - - - - - - - N eopagetoPGi$ ionah
Pagetopsis m acropterus
PagetopS'is m aculatus
C hion 0 draco Tastro spinellu iii:
Chaenodraco wilsoni
C hannichthys rhinoceratu:!l
Chaenoce-phalus aceratu9
Cryodraco antarcticuB
Fig. 1. The neighbor-joining tree obtained from the Nei [11] genetic distance matrix
. . . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - T re m a tom us lep ido rh in us
..... - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - C ham p so ce p ha Iu s gun n ari
. . . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Neopagetopsis ionah
...-_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 6::..;:.9-1
Pagetopsis m acropterus
Pagetopsis m aculatus
. . . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Chaenodraco wilsoni
L -----t==============_ C hio nod rae 0 ham atu s
C hionodraco rastrospinosus
..... - - - - - - - Chionodraco m yersi
..... - - - - C hannichthys rhinoceratus
Cryodraco antarcticus
C haenocephalus aceratus
Fig. 2. The strict consensus of the two maximum parsimony trees obtained from a Branch
and Bound search using PAUP 3.1.1. Tree length is 66; CI = 0.591; RI = 0.757. Bootstrap
proportions above 50% are indicated (calculated using 1000 replicates)
..... - - - - Cham psocephalus
..... _ _ _ _ Pagetopsis+N eopagetopsis
+ P s e u doc h a e n ie h th Y s
_---c hannichthy s
C hionodraco
Cbaenodraco
C haenocephalus
Chi 0 nob a th y s c u s
C ryodraco
, . . . . - - - - - - - - - - Cham psocephalus
P s e u doc h a e n i c b th y s
, . . . . - - - - - - C hannichthys
..... -----Cryodraco
, . . . - - - C haenoeephalu5
C hionodraco
Chaenodraeo
Fig. 3. Left: Iwami's (1985) c1adogram based on morphological characters. Dacodraco
branching point in the original tree was undetermined. Right: V oskoboinikova' s ( in press)
phenogram based on the global similarity of developmental features. The original tree was
rooted on Cryodraco; it was rerooted here on Champsocephalus for comparison. Original
branch lengths are not presented here