176
Carlos A. Gracia, Estibaliz Tello, Santiago Sabat!! and Juan Bellot
YEAR 50
_
CONTROL
_
MINIMUM THINNING
~ MAXIMUM THI NNING
30
~>175
~
~
2.5
150
::.?'
::;
c 20
125
~
100
...J
1.5
...J
«
..,
s:
~
0
Ol
~
"75
a::
w 1.0
I:
a.
a.
..,
::; 00
0
;!!
;!!
;0
;0
m
4.5
180 m
C/)
C/)
'0
'0
m
4,0
160 m
(')
5
(')
....
....
....
1=_ 3.5
140 ....
0
u ~
0
(')
8-: 3.0
120 (')
0
0
z
z
;a
a:: s: 25
100 ....
0. ::::<
;0
0
~ c; 2,0
j2
r80
'0
'0
r...J~
r~
1
0
....
16
a. 14
(j)
W
a::
w :: 12
u>
~ -
z.l! 10
W::;
~o
<{~ 8
::;~
c
0
c
z
z
I:}
0
m
45
m
;0
110 ;0
125 '0
9
'0
;0
100 ;0
m
m
C/)
C/)
m
:;90 m
z
z
....
E
-(
n
1
80 (')
r~
70
~
~
~
-<
m
60 m
C/)
C/)
(')
2
(')
m
m
Z
Z
~
0
~
5
5
0
70 C
>' "
s:
::::<
c
en
~
a.
a.
z 5
~
100
..,
.,
90
~
W
"80
::;
~
70
...J
Z
60
;tj
::::< 1
0
Fig. 12.4. Final values of modelled gross primary production (GPP, a), maintenance respiration (b),
net primary production (NPP, c), wood production (d), litterfall (e), leaf production (f), leaf area
index (LAJ, g) and mean leaf life (h) in control and thinned plots after SO-year simulation under
both climate scenarios (T increased temperature; W decreased precipitation). Right axes indicate
relative value as a percentage with respect to control treatment under present climate scenario