206
10 Appendices
Appendix 15: Storage quality contd.
Brazil
64%
poor
Egypt
100%
poor
Haiti
poor
India
63%
poor
Madagascar
poor
Seychelles
poor
South Africa
poor
Spain
poor
Suriname
poor
Tanzania
poor
Togo
poor
Tonga
poor
Storage facilities are unreliable according to the CR.
Haiti has no ex situ conservation.
No information is provided, it may be assumed that the
standard is more likely poor, esp. considering that the
long-term stores seem to be unreliable.
Because no information is provided it may be assumed that
standard is more likely poor.
Some storage facilities are unreliable, for instance, some
accessions have been lost due to lack of regeneration.
No information is provided, it may be assumed that the
standard is more likely poor.
Suriname has no ex situ conservation
No information is provided, it may be assumed that the
standard is more likely poor.
No information is provided, it may be assumed that the
standard is more likely poor.
All ex situ material is conserved as tissue culture, but
because no information is provided it may be assumed that
the standard is more likely poor
Storage quality is assessed for medium and short-term storage for countries without long-term
storage facilities.
good quality: less than 20% regeneration requirements;
basic quality: more than 20% regeneration requirements;
poor quality: more than 50% regeneration requirements.
n.i. = no information
Source:
respective Country Reports, F AO, 1996h