References
193
large-scale consequences for further (coastal protection) projects in the entire European Union.
Today, the Ley Bay project is completed and the Ley nose has already been built – Janssen
(1992). (Ahlhorn (2009, p. 160–161)
8.4.1 Task
In Fig. 8.4 the first proposal and the finally implemented solution are shown. Compare
both approaches.
1. What might be the reasons why the first proposal as multifunctional approach (A) has
been rejected by representatives of environmental groups?
2. What might be beneficial aspects of the compromise (B)?
References
F. Ahlhorn. Long-term Perspective in Coastal Zone Development. Multifunctional Coastal Protection Zones. Springer, 2009.
F. Ahlhorn, J. Meyerdirks, and I. Umlauf. Speichern statt pumpen. Abschlussbericht. Technical
report, University of Oldenburg, 2010.
H.-F. Erchinger. Küstenschutz durch Vorlandgewinnung, Deichbau und Deicherhaltung in Ostfriesland. Die Küste, 19:125–185, 1970.
W. Hartung. Die Leybucht (Ostfriesland) – Probleme ihrer Erhaltung als Naturschutzgebiet. Neues
Archiv für Niedersachsen, 32(4):355–387, 1983.
T. Janssen. Die Leybucht: Natur- und Küstenschutz. Eine Dokumentation. SKN, Norden, 1992.
H. Kunz. The Leyhörn Project – An integrated engineering response to multifarious demands of a
coastal community. In Proc. Fifth Intern. Conf. on Coastal and Port Engineering in Developing
Countries, volume 3, pages 2176–2186. COPEDEC, 1999.
[Niedersächsisches Ministerium für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Forsten] Nds. MELF. Generalplan Küstenschutz Niedersachsen. Technical report, Niedersächsisches Ministerium für
Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Forsten, 1973.
193
large-scale consequences for further (coastal protection) projects in the entire European Union.
Today, the Ley Bay project is completed and the Ley nose has already been built – Janssen
(1992). (Ahlhorn (2009, p. 160–161)
8.4.1 Task
In Fig. 8.4 the first proposal and the finally implemented solution are shown. Compare
both approaches.
1. What might be the reasons why the first proposal as multifunctional approach (A) has
been rejected by representatives of environmental groups?
2. What might be beneficial aspects of the compromise (B)?
References
F. Ahlhorn. Long-term Perspective in Coastal Zone Development. Multifunctional Coastal Protection Zones. Springer, 2009.
F. Ahlhorn, J. Meyerdirks, and I. Umlauf. Speichern statt pumpen. Abschlussbericht. Technical
report, University of Oldenburg, 2010.
H.-F. Erchinger. Küstenschutz durch Vorlandgewinnung, Deichbau und Deicherhaltung in Ostfriesland. Die Küste, 19:125–185, 1970.
W. Hartung. Die Leybucht (Ostfriesland) – Probleme ihrer Erhaltung als Naturschutzgebiet. Neues
Archiv für Niedersachsen, 32(4):355–387, 1983.
T. Janssen. Die Leybucht: Natur- und Küstenschutz. Eine Dokumentation. SKN, Norden, 1992.
H. Kunz. The Leyhörn Project – An integrated engineering response to multifarious demands of a
coastal community. In Proc. Fifth Intern. Conf. on Coastal and Port Engineering in Developing
Countries, volume 3, pages 2176–2186. COPEDEC, 1999.
[Niedersächsisches Ministerium für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Forsten] Nds. MELF. Generalplan Küstenschutz Niedersachsen. Technical report, Niedersächsisches Ministerium für
Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Forsten, 1973.