372
DYNAMICAL OCEANOGRAPHY
15.5. Exercises on chapter 15
(15.1) Limits
There are two interesting limits in the problem discussed in Example 15.2.
a. First consider the limit ǫ 0 H 1 /DA f →∞ . Determine the resulting
streamfunction solutions and provide a physical interpretation for the result.
b. Second, consider the limit ǫ 0 → 0 as was used in the Figs. 15.8. Again,
determine the resulting solutions and provide a physical interpretation of the
result.
(15.2) Homogenization of PV
The solution of the problem in Example 15.3 has an interesting potential
vorticity distribution.
a. Determine the potential vorticity q 2 (of the bottom layer) and in particular
consider the limit ǫ 0 → 0.
Assume more generally that the dissipation term in the lower layer vorticity
equation can be written as ∇·(κ∇q 2 ) instead of using the interfacial friction
term. Instead of (15.19) we then obtain with ǫ 0 =0,
J(ψ 2 , ˆ
q 2 )=∇·(κ∇q 2 )
b. Show that
C
κ∇q 2 · n ds =0
where the integral is taken over a closed streamline in the lower layer.
We can also use the constraint of potential vorticity conservation in the frictionless limit, i.e., q 2 =Ψ(ψ 2 ).
c. Show that for all closed streamlines
dΨ
dψ 2
=0
and provide a physical interpretation of the result.
DYNAMICAL OCEANOGRAPHY
15.5. Exercises on chapter 15
(15.1) Limits
There are two interesting limits in the problem discussed in Example 15.2.
a. First consider the limit ǫ 0 H 1 /DA f →∞ . Determine the resulting
streamfunction solutions and provide a physical interpretation for the result.
b. Second, consider the limit ǫ 0 → 0 as was used in the Figs. 15.8. Again,
determine the resulting solutions and provide a physical interpretation of the
result.
(15.2) Homogenization of PV
The solution of the problem in Example 15.3 has an interesting potential
vorticity distribution.
a. Determine the potential vorticity q 2 (of the bottom layer) and in particular
consider the limit ǫ 0 → 0.
Assume more generally that the dissipation term in the lower layer vorticity
equation can be written as ∇·(κ∇q 2 ) instead of using the interfacial friction
term. Instead of (15.19) we then obtain with ǫ 0 =0,
J(ψ 2 , ˆ
q 2 )=∇·(κ∇q 2 )
b. Show that
C
κ∇q 2 · n ds =0
where the integral is taken over a closed streamline in the lower layer.
We can also use the constraint of potential vorticity conservation in the frictionless limit, i.e., q 2 =Ψ(ψ 2 ).
c. Show that for all closed streamlines
dΨ
dψ 2
=0
and provide a physical interpretation of the result.
