Chapter 1: INTRODUCTION
while the flux absorbed by the sea is equal to
1
d
r
b
d
I
I I
I
A
(1.57)
Fresnel’s formula can be used for an idealized plane sea surface to
calculate the reflectance coefficient, R s , which is independent of absorption
and scattering properties of the waters. Curve 1 in Figure 1-7 corresponds to
the idealized case of direct incident solar rays and flat ocean surface; curve 2
includes scattered solar radiation as well (cloudy sky). The reflectance
coefficient typically lies in the range of 5 to 7 % for a plane sea surface and
an overcast sky, but can exceed 30 % when the sun is low on the horizon of
a clear sky.
Cox and Munk (1956) and Saunders (1967a) studied reflectance
calculations in more complicated situations including rough seas and low
solar elevation. Their results are also shown in Figure 1-7 (curve 3). Note
that the solar elevation [ and solar zenith angle T are related by[
R
T
27
Figure 1-7. Reflectance coefficient (R s in our notation) as a function of the solar elevation [ҏ
Here: curve 1 is the idealized case of direct incident solar rays and flat ocean surface; curve 2
the case of total (direct and scattered) solar rays and flat ocean surface; curves 3 the case of
direct solar rays and rough seas. Curves 3 are calculated from the Cox and Munk (1956) data
for two different assumptions regarding multiple reflections at low sun elevations. (After
Ivanoff, 1977.) Copyright owner could not be found.
while the flux absorbed by the sea is equal to
1
d
r
b
d
I
I I
I
A
(1.57)
Fresnel’s formula can be used for an idealized plane sea surface to
calculate the reflectance coefficient, R s , which is independent of absorption
and scattering properties of the waters. Curve 1 in Figure 1-7 corresponds to
the idealized case of direct incident solar rays and flat ocean surface; curve 2
includes scattered solar radiation as well (cloudy sky). The reflectance
coefficient typically lies in the range of 5 to 7 % for a plane sea surface and
an overcast sky, but can exceed 30 % when the sun is low on the horizon of
a clear sky.
Cox and Munk (1956) and Saunders (1967a) studied reflectance
calculations in more complicated situations including rough seas and low
solar elevation. Their results are also shown in Figure 1-7 (curve 3). Note
that the solar elevation [ and solar zenith angle T are related by[
R
T
27
Figure 1-7. Reflectance coefficient (R s in our notation) as a function of the solar elevation [ҏ
Here: curve 1 is the idealized case of direct incident solar rays and flat ocean surface; curve 2
the case of total (direct and scattered) solar rays and flat ocean surface; curves 3 the case of
direct solar rays and rough seas. Curves 3 are calculated from the Cox and Munk (1956) data
for two different assumptions regarding multiple reflections at low sun elevations. (After
Ivanoff, 1977.) Copyright owner could not be found.
