>~
a ~
0
>o
c 0
0.00
-0.16
-0.30
-0.46
-0.80
-0.76
-0.90
-1.0
~r
0
N
l~oo
~
:~
~
-0.8
-0.8
77
>~
0.00
-0.16
-0.30
-0.46
-0.80
-0.76
-0.90
b
0.0
1.0
0.0
1.0
X
X
• •1.0
0.0
X
~+---------------r-------------_, d
~
·~
~
X
Fig. 2.12.8a-d. As in Fig. 2.12.7, but the total vorticity field is shown instead of the streamfunction
In such a transition region the boundary-layer flow, Moore reasoned,
could be thought of as a small perturbation on the Sverdrup flow, 1/J 1 . Thus, if
we write the full boundary-layer solution as the sum:
(2.13.1)
where:
in the transition region between the boundary layer and the interior the
linearized boundary-layer equation becomes:
a ~
0
>o
c 0
0.00
-0.16
-0.30
-0.46
-0.80
-0.76
-0.90
-1.0
~r
0
N
l~oo
~
:~
~
-0.8
-0.8
77
>~
0.00
-0.16
-0.30
-0.46
-0.80
-0.76
-0.90
b
0.0
1.0
0.0
1.0
X
X
• •1.0
0.0
X
~+---------------r-------------_, d
~
·~
~
X
Fig. 2.12.8a-d. As in Fig. 2.12.7, but the total vorticity field is shown instead of the streamfunction
In such a transition region the boundary-layer flow, Moore reasoned,
could be thought of as a small perturbation on the Sverdrup flow, 1/J 1 . Thus, if
we write the full boundary-layer solution as the sum:
(2.13.1)
where:
in the transition region between the boundary layer and the interior the
linearized boundary-layer equation becomes: