References
Balasubramanian, M., & Dilip Kumar, P. J. (2014). Climate change, Uttarakhand, and the World
Bank’s message. Economic and Political Weekly, XLIX(1), 65–68.
Chokkalingam, U., & Vanniarachchy, S. A. (2014). CDM AR did not fail and is not dead. In
Forest Carbon Asia, June 7, 2014. At www.forestcarbonasia.org/articles/cdm-ar-did-not-failand-is-not-dead/. Accessed May 25, 2015.
de Vries, B., Bollen, J., Bouwman, L., den Elzen, M., Janssen, M., & Kreilman, K. (2000).
Greenhouse gas emissions in an equity-, environment- and service-oriented world: An
IMAGE-based scenario for the 21st century. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,
63, 137–174. (Quoted by Lomborg 2001, p. 317).
Dilip Kumar, P. J. (1991). Between common property and state monopoly: The institutional
context of wasteland management in India. In Managing the Village Commons, Proceedings of
National Workshop, December 15–16, 1991, Bhubaneswar, Orissa. IIFM: Bhopal.
Dilip Kumar, P. J. (2013). Village communities and their common property forests. Economic and
Political Weekly, XLVIII(35), 33–36.
Dilip Kumar, P. J. (2014a). Climate change, forest carbon sequestration and REDD-plus. The
context of India. Economic and Political Weekly, XLIX(22), 22–25.
Dilip Kumar, P. J. (2014b). Western ghats conservation: Experts’ reports and a view from the
ground. Economic and Political Weekly, XLIX(22), 224–229.
Dilip Kumar, P. J. (2014c). Forestry challenges in India-I. Strengths, achievements. www.
forestmatters.blogspot.com/2014/12/02-challenges-facing-forestry-in-india.html
Government of India. (2012). India. In Second national communication to the United Nations
framework convention on climate change. New Delhi.
Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243–1248.
IPCC. (2014a). Summary for policymakers. In C. B. Field, et al. (Eds.), Climate change 2014:
Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: Global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of
working group II to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate
change (IPCC AR5) (pp. 1–32). United Kingdom and New York, USA: Cambridge University
Press. https://ipcc-wg2.gov/AR5/images/uploads/WG2AR5_SPM_FINAL.pdf. Accessed on
May 25, 2015.
IPCC. (2014b). Summary for policymakers. In O. Edenhofer, et al. (Eds.), Climate change 2014:
Mitigation of climate change. Contribution of working group III to the fifth assessment report
of the intergovernmental panel on climate change (IPCC AR5) (pp. 1–32). United Kingdom
and New York, USA: Cambridge University Press. report.mitigation2014.org/spm/ipcc_wg3_
ar5_summary-for-policymakers_approved.pdf. Accessed on May 25, 2015.
IPCC. (2014c). Climate change 2014: Synthesis report. Geneva: IPCC.
Lomborg, B. (2001). The skeptical environmentalist. Measuring the real state of the world. UK
and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Olson, M. (1971). The logic of collective action. Public goods and the theory of groups.
Cambridge (USA): Harvard University Press.
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons. The evolution of institutions for collective action.
Cambridge: Cambridge Universities Press.
Ravindranath, N. H. (2015). Costs and benefits of the Green India mission for mitigation. In
Economics of climate change mitigation options in the forest sector. Session: Afforestation and
reforestation, Friday February 6, 2015. Rome: FAO. www.fao.org/forestry/cc-mitigationeconomics/88445/en/
UNFCCC. (2013). Afforestation and reforestation projects under the clean development mechanism. A reference manual. In United Nations framework convention on climate change. Bonn.
At www.unfccc.int/resource/docs/publications/cdm_afforestation_bro_web.pdf. Accessed May
25, 2015.
38
P.J. Dilip Kumar
Balasubramanian, M., & Dilip Kumar, P. J. (2014). Climate change, Uttarakhand, and the World
Bank’s message. Economic and Political Weekly, XLIX(1), 65–68.
Chokkalingam, U., & Vanniarachchy, S. A. (2014). CDM AR did not fail and is not dead. In
Forest Carbon Asia, June 7, 2014. At www.forestcarbonasia.org/articles/cdm-ar-did-not-failand-is-not-dead/. Accessed May 25, 2015.
de Vries, B., Bollen, J., Bouwman, L., den Elzen, M., Janssen, M., & Kreilman, K. (2000).
Greenhouse gas emissions in an equity-, environment- and service-oriented world: An
IMAGE-based scenario for the 21st century. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,
63, 137–174. (Quoted by Lomborg 2001, p. 317).
Dilip Kumar, P. J. (1991). Between common property and state monopoly: The institutional
context of wasteland management in India. In Managing the Village Commons, Proceedings of
National Workshop, December 15–16, 1991, Bhubaneswar, Orissa. IIFM: Bhopal.
Dilip Kumar, P. J. (2013). Village communities and their common property forests. Economic and
Political Weekly, XLVIII(35), 33–36.
Dilip Kumar, P. J. (2014a). Climate change, forest carbon sequestration and REDD-plus. The
context of India. Economic and Political Weekly, XLIX(22), 22–25.
Dilip Kumar, P. J. (2014b). Western ghats conservation: Experts’ reports and a view from the
ground. Economic and Political Weekly, XLIX(22), 224–229.
Dilip Kumar, P. J. (2014c). Forestry challenges in India-I. Strengths, achievements. www.
forestmatters.blogspot.com/2014/12/02-challenges-facing-forestry-in-india.html
Government of India. (2012). India. In Second national communication to the United Nations
framework convention on climate change. New Delhi.
Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243–1248.
IPCC. (2014a). Summary for policymakers. In C. B. Field, et al. (Eds.), Climate change 2014:
Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: Global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of
working group II to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate
change (IPCC AR5) (pp. 1–32). United Kingdom and New York, USA: Cambridge University
Press. https://ipcc-wg2.gov/AR5/images/uploads/WG2AR5_SPM_FINAL.pdf. Accessed on
May 25, 2015.
IPCC. (2014b). Summary for policymakers. In O. Edenhofer, et al. (Eds.), Climate change 2014:
Mitigation of climate change. Contribution of working group III to the fifth assessment report
of the intergovernmental panel on climate change (IPCC AR5) (pp. 1–32). United Kingdom
and New York, USA: Cambridge University Press. report.mitigation2014.org/spm/ipcc_wg3_
ar5_summary-for-policymakers_approved.pdf. Accessed on May 25, 2015.
IPCC. (2014c). Climate change 2014: Synthesis report. Geneva: IPCC.
Lomborg, B. (2001). The skeptical environmentalist. Measuring the real state of the world. UK
and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Olson, M. (1971). The logic of collective action. Public goods and the theory of groups.
Cambridge (USA): Harvard University Press.
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons. The evolution of institutions for collective action.
Cambridge: Cambridge Universities Press.
Ravindranath, N. H. (2015). Costs and benefits of the Green India mission for mitigation. In
Economics of climate change mitigation options in the forest sector. Session: Afforestation and
reforestation, Friday February 6, 2015. Rome: FAO. www.fao.org/forestry/cc-mitigationeconomics/88445/en/
UNFCCC. (2013). Afforestation and reforestation projects under the clean development mechanism. A reference manual. In United Nations framework convention on climate change. Bonn.
At www.unfccc.int/resource/docs/publications/cdm_afforestation_bro_web.pdf. Accessed May
25, 2015.
38
P.J. Dilip Kumar