Références bibliographiques
73
Linnaeus C. (1758). Systema Naturae, Ed. X. (Systema naturae per regna tria
naturae,secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis,
synonymis,locis. Tomus I. Editio decima, reformata.) Holmiae. v. 1: i-ii + 1-824.
Ljunggren L. (2002). Growth response of pikeperch larvae in relation to body size and
zooplankton abundance. Journal of Fish Biology 60: P.P. 405-414.
Ljubobratović U-G., Péter F., et al. (2020). Reproductive performance in virgin pikeperch
(Sander lucioperca L.) females fed different dietary levels of arachidonic acid with respect to
the duration of spawning induction. Aquacult. Rep. In press.
M’Hetli M. (2001). Le sandre Stizostedion lucioperca (Linnaeus, 1758) téléostéen Percidae.
Poisson allochtone : étude biologique et essai d’optimisation des critères d’élevage. Thèse de
Doctorat en sciences biologiques, Université de Tunis, 173 p.
Magnan D. (1999). Le sandre (sander lucioperca (L.)) : biologie, comportement et
dynamique des populations en camargne. France. 99 p.
Maitland P-S. (2004). Keys to the freshwater fish of Britain and Ireland, with notes on their
distribution and ecology. Ambleside, Cumbria, UK: UK Freshwater Biological Association
(FBA), 248 pp.
Malinovskyi O-T., Policar S., et al. (2021). Boryshpolets Multiple sperm collection as an
effective solution for gamete management in pikeperch (Sander lucioperca). Aquaculture,
530, p. 735870,
Meddour A., Rouabah A., et al. (2005). Experimentationsur la reproduction artificielle de
Sander lucioperca, hypophthalmichthys molitrix et Aristschthys nobilis en Algérie. Sciences
& Technologie C : (23), 63 Ŕ 71.
Micha J-C. (1974). La pisciculture africaine. Espèces actuelles.
Mugnier C-M., Guennoc E., et al. (2000). Induction and synchronisation of spawning in
cultivated turbot (Scophthalmus maximus L.) broodstock by implantation of a sustainedrelease GnRH-a pellet. Aquaculture, 181 (3-4), pp. 241-255.
Mukai Y., Tuzan A-D., et al. (2008). Development of sensory organ in larvae of fishes.
Journal of Fish Biology 73: 1648–1661.
73
Linnaeus C. (1758). Systema Naturae, Ed. X. (Systema naturae per regna tria
naturae,secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis,
synonymis,locis. Tomus I. Editio decima, reformata.) Holmiae. v. 1: i-ii + 1-824.
Ljunggren L. (2002). Growth response of pikeperch larvae in relation to body size and
zooplankton abundance. Journal of Fish Biology 60: P.P. 405-414.
Ljubobratović U-G., Péter F., et al. (2020). Reproductive performance in virgin pikeperch
(Sander lucioperca L.) females fed different dietary levels of arachidonic acid with respect to
the duration of spawning induction. Aquacult. Rep. In press.
M’Hetli M. (2001). Le sandre Stizostedion lucioperca (Linnaeus, 1758) téléostéen Percidae.
Poisson allochtone : étude biologique et essai d’optimisation des critères d’élevage. Thèse de
Doctorat en sciences biologiques, Université de Tunis, 173 p.
Magnan D. (1999). Le sandre (sander lucioperca (L.)) : biologie, comportement et
dynamique des populations en camargne. France. 99 p.
Maitland P-S. (2004). Keys to the freshwater fish of Britain and Ireland, with notes on their
distribution and ecology. Ambleside, Cumbria, UK: UK Freshwater Biological Association
(FBA), 248 pp.
Malinovskyi O-T., Policar S., et al. (2021). Boryshpolets Multiple sperm collection as an
effective solution for gamete management in pikeperch (Sander lucioperca). Aquaculture,
530, p. 735870,
Meddour A., Rouabah A., et al. (2005). Experimentationsur la reproduction artificielle de
Sander lucioperca, hypophthalmichthys molitrix et Aristschthys nobilis en Algérie. Sciences
& Technologie C : (23), 63 Ŕ 71.
Micha J-C. (1974). La pisciculture africaine. Espèces actuelles.
Mugnier C-M., Guennoc E., et al. (2000). Induction and synchronisation of spawning in
cultivated turbot (Scophthalmus maximus L.) broodstock by implantation of a sustainedrelease GnRH-a pellet. Aquaculture, 181 (3-4), pp. 241-255.
Mukai Y., Tuzan A-D., et al. (2008). Development of sensory organ in larvae of fishes.
Journal of Fish Biology 73: 1648–1661.