Table 1. Comparative study of the medical annotation systems using 5 criteria
Name of annotation
system
Year Healthcare
professional
(Practitioner)
Annotated
resource
type
Category of annotation
system
Annotation type
Type of annotation activity
Application Plugin
Web Cognitive Computational Manual Automatic Semiautomatic
Santo
[1] 2018 D
Text
Â
Â
Â
Clean tools
[2] 2018 D
Image 3D
Â
Â
Â
Epivizr
[3] 2018 B
Document
Â
Â
Â
Â
ODMSummary [4] 2017 D
HTML
Â
Â
Â
3dBionote
[5] 2017 B
Image
Â
Â
Â
Verdant
[6] 2017 B
Text
Â
Â
Â
Best slice
[7] 2017 R, D
Image
Â
Â
Â
MicroMD
[8] 2017 R, D
Image
Â
Â
Â
GIDAC
[9] 2016 R
Image
Â
Â
Â
Vcf-miner
[10] 2016 B
Text
Â
Â
Â
Plexo
[11] 2016 R
Image
Â
Â
Â
BioDigital
human
[12] 2016 D
Image 3D
Â
Â
Â
Icare
[13] 2015 N
Document
Â
Â
Â
Heideltime
[14] 2015 A
Time
Â
Â
Â
Domeo
Annotation
[15] 2014 B
HTML
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
BioR
[16] 2014 B
Text
Â
Â
Â
Â
3dmarkup
radiologist
[17] 2014 R
Image
Â
Â
Â
Vita
[18] 2014 R
Image,
video
Â
Â
Â
Marky
[19] 2014 R
All type
Â
Â
Â
(continued)
320
K. Chehab et al.