References
1. The top 10 causes of death. In: World Heal. Organ. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/
factsheets/fs310/en/. Accessed 3 Jun 2017
2. Casas, A., et al.: Integrated care prevents hospitalisations for exacerbations in COPD
patients. Eur. Respir. J. 28(1), 123–130 (2006)
3. Global Strategy for the Diagnosis Management and Prevention of COPD, Global Initiative
for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) (2011)
4. McKinstry, B.: The use of remote monitoring technologies in managing chronic obstructive
pulmonary disease (2013)
5. Bolton, C.E., Waters, C.S., Peirce, S., Elwyn, G.: Insufficient evidence of benefit: a
systematic review of home telemonitoring for COPD. J. Eval. Clin. Pract. 17(6), 1216–1222
(2010)
6. Polisena, J., et al.: Home telehealth for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic
review and meta-analysis. J. Telemed. Telec. 16, 120–127 (2010)
7. Jaana, M., Pare, G., Sicotte, C.: Home telemonitoring forrespiratory conditions: a systematic
review. Am. J. Manage. Care 15(5), 313–320 (2009)
8. Bartoli, L., Zanaboni, P., Masella, C., Ursini, N.: Systematicreview of telemedicine services
for patients affected by Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). Telemed.
J. E Health 15(9), 877–883 (2009)
9. McLean, S., Nurmatov, U., Liu, J.L., Pagliari, C., Car, J., Sheikh, A.: Telehealthcare for
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Cochrane Review and meta-analysis. Br. J. Gen.
Pract. 62(604), e739–e749 (2012). https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp12X658269
10. Lieberman, H., Selker, T.: Out of context: computer systems that adapt to, and learn from,
context. IBM Syst. J. 39, 617–632 (2000)
11. Krupitzer, C., Roth, F.M., VanSyckel, S., Schiele, G., Becker, C.: A survey on engineering
approaches for self-adaptive systems. Pervasive Mob. Comput. J. 17(Part B), 184–206
(2015)
12. Oreizy, P., et al.: An architecture-based approach to self-adaptive software. IEEE Intell. Syst.
14(3), 54–62 (1999)
13. Cheng, S.-W.: Rainbow: cost-effective software architecture-based self-adaptation. Ph.D.
Dissertation. Carnegie Mellon University (2008)
14. Becker: Comparison of approaches for developing self-adaptive systems. In: Proceedings of
ACM, New York, NY, USA, 14 p. (2018)
15. Di Marzo Serugendo, G., Fitzgerald, J., Romanovsky, A.: MetaSelf - an architecture and a
development method for dependable self-* systems. In: Proc SAC, pp. 457–461. ACM
(2010)
16. Mukhija, A., Martin G.: CASA a contract-based adaptive software architecture framework.
In: Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE Workshop on Applications and Services in Wireless
Networks (ASWN 2003), Berne, Switzerland, pp. 275–286, July 2003
17. Andr, F., Daubert, E., Gauvrit, G.: Towards a generic context-aware framework for
self-adaptation of service-oriented architectures (2010)
18. Elmalaki, S., Wanner, L., Srivastava, M.: CAreDroid: adaptation framework for android
context-aware applications. In: Proceedings of Annual International Conference on Mobile
Computind Network (2015)
19. Gaasbeek, J.R., Martin, J.N.: Getting to requirements: the W5H challenge. In: Proceedings
of the 11th International Symposium of the International Council on Systems Engineering
(2001)
314
H. Mcheick et al.
Précédent

- 319/446

Suivant