This approach meets the various security criteria such as confidentiality, authentication,
integrity, decentralization and protection of private data. this approach can be applied
in different domains such as e-health to show the strong points of this one in the ehealth domain it is necessary to link it with the Internet of Things domain [19].
As future work, we need to implement the new solution in order to study its
feasibility and measure its performance.
References
1. Kim, H., Laskowski, M.: A perspective on blockchain smart contracts: reducing uncertainty
and complexity in value exchange. In: 2017 26th International Conference on Computer
Communication and Networks (ICCCN) (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/icccn.2017.
8038512
2. Wood, G.: Ethereum: a secure decentralized generalized transaction ledger. Ethereum Proj.
Yellow Paper 151, 1–32 (2014)
3. McCorry, P., Shahandashti, S.F., Hao, F.: A smart contract for boardroom voting with
maximum voter privacy. In: Kiayias, A. (ed.) FC 2017. LNCS, vol. 10322, pp. 357–375.
Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70972-7_20
4. Szabo,
N.:
Smart
contracts
(1994).
http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/rob/Courses/
InformationInSpeech/CDROM/Literature/LOTwinterschol2006/szabo.best.vwh.net/smart.
contracts.html
5. Magazzeni, D., McBurney, P.: Validation and verification of smart contracts: a research
agenda. Computer 50, 50–57 (2017)
6. Braghin, C., Cimato, S., Damiani, E., Baronchelli, M.: Designing smart-contract based
auctions. In: Yang, C.-N., Peng, S.-L., Jain, L.C. (eds.) SICBS 2018. AISC, vol. 895,
pp. 54–64. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16946-6_5
7. Nakamoto, S.: Bitcoin: a peer-to-peer electronic cash system (2008). https://bitcoin.org/
bitcoin.pdf
8. Cheng, J.-C., Lee, N.-Y., Chi, C., Chen, Y.-H.: Blockchain and smart contract for digital
certificate. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Applied System Invention (ICASI)
(2018)
9. Ahmed, A.S., Aura, T.: Turning trust around: smart contract-assisted public key
infrastructure. In: 2018 17th IEEE International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy
in Computing and Communications/12th IEEE International Conference on Big Data
Science and Engineering (TrustCom/BigDataSE) (2018)
10. Kosba, A., Miller, A., Shi, E., Wen, Z., Papamanthou, C.: Hawk: the blockchain model of
cryptography and privacy-preserving smart contracts. In: IEEE Security and Privacy (S&P)
(2016)
11. Rifi, N., Rachkidi, E., Agoulmine, N., Taher, N.C.: Towards using blockchain technology
for eHealth data access management. In: 2017 Fourth International Conference on Advances
in Biomedical Engineering (ICABME) (2017)
12. Benet, J.: IPFS - Content addressed, versioned, p2p file system (draft 3) (2014). https://ipfs.
io/ipfs/QmR7GSQM93Cx5eAg6a6yRzNde1FQv7uL6X1o4k7zrJa3LX/ipfs.draft3.pdf
13. Maymounkov, P., Mazières, D.: Kademlia: a peer-to-peer information system based on the
XOR metric. In: Druschel, P., Kaashoek, F., Rowstron, A. (eds.) IPTPS 2002. LNCS, vol.
2429, pp. 53–65. Springer, Heidelberg (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45748-8_5.
http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=646334.687801
Trust Execution Environment and Multi-party Computation
285
integrity, decentralization and protection of private data. this approach can be applied
in different domains such as e-health to show the strong points of this one in the ehealth domain it is necessary to link it with the Internet of Things domain [19].
As future work, we need to implement the new solution in order to study its
feasibility and measure its performance.
References
1. Kim, H., Laskowski, M.: A perspective on blockchain smart contracts: reducing uncertainty
and complexity in value exchange. In: 2017 26th International Conference on Computer
Communication and Networks (ICCCN) (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/icccn.2017.
8038512
2. Wood, G.: Ethereum: a secure decentralized generalized transaction ledger. Ethereum Proj.
Yellow Paper 151, 1–32 (2014)
3. McCorry, P., Shahandashti, S.F., Hao, F.: A smart contract for boardroom voting with
maximum voter privacy. In: Kiayias, A. (ed.) FC 2017. LNCS, vol. 10322, pp. 357–375.
Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70972-7_20
4. Szabo,
N.:
Smart
contracts
(1994).
http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/rob/Courses/
InformationInSpeech/CDROM/Literature/LOTwinterschol2006/szabo.best.vwh.net/smart.
contracts.html
5. Magazzeni, D., McBurney, P.: Validation and verification of smart contracts: a research
agenda. Computer 50, 50–57 (2017)
6. Braghin, C., Cimato, S., Damiani, E., Baronchelli, M.: Designing smart-contract based
auctions. In: Yang, C.-N., Peng, S.-L., Jain, L.C. (eds.) SICBS 2018. AISC, vol. 895,
pp. 54–64. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16946-6_5
7. Nakamoto, S.: Bitcoin: a peer-to-peer electronic cash system (2008). https://bitcoin.org/
bitcoin.pdf
8. Cheng, J.-C., Lee, N.-Y., Chi, C., Chen, Y.-H.: Blockchain and smart contract for digital
certificate. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Applied System Invention (ICASI)
(2018)
9. Ahmed, A.S., Aura, T.: Turning trust around: smart contract-assisted public key
infrastructure. In: 2018 17th IEEE International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy
in Computing and Communications/12th IEEE International Conference on Big Data
Science and Engineering (TrustCom/BigDataSE) (2018)
10. Kosba, A., Miller, A., Shi, E., Wen, Z., Papamanthou, C.: Hawk: the blockchain model of
cryptography and privacy-preserving smart contracts. In: IEEE Security and Privacy (S&P)
(2016)
11. Rifi, N., Rachkidi, E., Agoulmine, N., Taher, N.C.: Towards using blockchain technology
for eHealth data access management. In: 2017 Fourth International Conference on Advances
in Biomedical Engineering (ICABME) (2017)
12. Benet, J.: IPFS - Content addressed, versioned, p2p file system (draft 3) (2014). https://ipfs.
io/ipfs/QmR7GSQM93Cx5eAg6a6yRzNde1FQv7uL6X1o4k7zrJa3LX/ipfs.draft3.pdf
13. Maymounkov, P., Mazières, D.: Kademlia: a peer-to-peer information system based on the
XOR metric. In: Druschel, P., Kaashoek, F., Rowstron, A. (eds.) IPTPS 2002. LNCS, vol.
2429, pp. 53–65. Springer, Heidelberg (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45748-8_5.
http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=646334.687801
Trust Execution Environment and Multi-party Computation
285