Garrott et al. 1985
n.s.
F
Pr
Table 2.4 Continued
Marking
Technique
Species
Parameters
Tested
Lab (L) or
Field (F)
Effect
of Mark
Reference
Radiotransmitters
(continued )
Odocoileus hemionus
Re
F
n.s.
Hamlin et al. 1982
Odocoileus virginianus
Su
F
n.s.
Ozoga and Clute 1988
Peromyscus leucopus
Gr, Re, Su
L, F
n.s.
Smith 1980
Su, Re, Ma, Ac
F
n.s.
Ormiston 1985
Pa
F
Pa
Ostfeld et al. 1993
Peromyscus maniculatus
Pr
F
n.s.
Douglass 1992
Mo
F
n.s.
Mullican 1988
Plecoyus auritus
Mo
L
Mo
Hughes and Rayner 1991
Rhinolophus ferrumequinum Be, Su
F
n.s.
Stebbins 1982
Sciurus carolinensis
Ma, Su, Re
F
n.s.
Kenward 1982
Spermophilus franklinii
Su, Gr, Re
F
Su
Eagle et al. 1984
Vulpes macrotis
Su, Gr
F
Su, Gr
Cypher 1997
Effect of mark section corresponds to author’s interpretation of effects. Articles surveyed were published in the peer-reviewed literature and consist of qualitative or quantitative evaluations of marking effects. We report the effect of markers as being significant or not, as interpreted by the authors in the article.
Gr = growth, Su = survival, Be = behavior, Mo = movements, Ac = activity, Ma = mass, Co = condition, Pa = parasitism/disease, Pr = predation, Ph = physiology, St = stress,
Fo = foraging, Re = reproduction, En = energetics, So = social behavior.
n.s.
F
Pr
Table 2.4 Continued
Marking
Technique
Species
Parameters
Tested
Lab (L) or
Field (F)
Effect
of Mark
Reference
Radiotransmitters
(continued )
Odocoileus hemionus
Re
F
n.s.
Hamlin et al. 1982
Odocoileus virginianus
Su
F
n.s.
Ozoga and Clute 1988
Peromyscus leucopus
Gr, Re, Su
L, F
n.s.
Smith 1980
Su, Re, Ma, Ac
F
n.s.
Ormiston 1985
Pa
F
Pa
Ostfeld et al. 1993
Peromyscus maniculatus
Pr
F
n.s.
Douglass 1992
Mo
F
n.s.
Mullican 1988
Plecoyus auritus
Mo
L
Mo
Hughes and Rayner 1991
Rhinolophus ferrumequinum Be, Su
F
n.s.
Stebbins 1982
Sciurus carolinensis
Ma, Su, Re
F
n.s.
Kenward 1982
Spermophilus franklinii
Su, Gr, Re
F
Su
Eagle et al. 1984
Vulpes macrotis
Su, Gr
F
Su, Gr
Cypher 1997
Effect of mark section corresponds to author’s interpretation of effects. Articles surveyed were published in the peer-reviewed literature and consist of qualitative or quantitative evaluations of marking effects. We report the effect of markers as being significant or not, as interpreted by the authors in the article.
Gr = growth, Su = survival, Be = behavior, Mo = movements, Ac = activity, Ma = mass, Co = condition, Pa = parasitism/disease, Pr = predation, Ph = physiology, St = stress,
Fo = foraging, Re = reproduction, En = energetics, So = social behavior.