13.2.3 Although Variable According to the Region,
There Is a Low Level of Flexibility
of the Governance Context. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 249
13.3 Outcome of the Analysis: A Cross-cutting Perspective. . . . . . . 250
13.3.1 Water Governance Gives More Weight
to Representatives of Economic Interests
Than to Environmental Ones . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 251
13.3.2 A Hierarchy as Regards Water Uses in Case
of Water Scarcity that Favours Water Supplies . . . . . . 252
13.3.3 Contrasting Initiatives Which Try to Better Take
into Account Drought in All Sectors . . . . . . . . . . . . . 252
13.4 Conclusions and Recommendations Stemming
from the Implementation of the GAT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 253
13.4.1 Continuous Focus on Realizing Awareness
Is Needed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 253
13.4.2 Preparation and Implementation of Water
Demand Management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 254
13.4.3 The Need for an Increased Integration of Flood
and Drought Management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 255
13.4.4 Variety Requires Tailored Action . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 255
Contents
xvii