References
33
109. Von Der Decken, C.B. 1972. Mechanical problems of a pebble bed reactor core. Nuclear
Engineering & Design 18 (2): 323–333.
110. Kadak, A.C., and M.Z. Bazant. 2004. Pebble flow experiments for pebble-bed reactors. In
Proceedings of the Second International Topical Meeting on High Temperature Reactor Technology, Beijing, China.
111. Matzner, D. 2004. Pbmr executive overview. In Presentation at INET.
112. Yang, X.T., W.P. Hu, S.Y. Jiang, K.K.L. Wong, and J.Y. Tu. 2012. Mechanism analysis of quasistatic dense pebble flow in pebble bed reactor using phenomenological approach. Nuclear
Engineering and Design 250: 247–259.
113. Choi, Jaehyuk, Arshad Kudrolli, and Martin Z. Bazant. 2005. Velocity profile of granular flows
inside silos and hoppers. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 17 (24): S2533–S2548.
114. Choi, Jaehyuk, Arshad Kudrolli, R. Rosales Rodolfo, and Martin Z. Bazant. 2004. Diffusion
and mixing in gravity-driven dense granular flows. Physical Review Letters 92 (17): 174301.
115. Shams, Roelofs, M.J.E. Komen, and E. Baglietto. 2012. Optimization of a pebble bed configuration for quasi-direct numerical simulation. Nuclear Engineering & Design 242: 331–340.
116. Shams, A., F. Roelofs, E.M.J. Komen, and E. Baglietto. 2013. Quasi-direct numerical simulation of a pebble bed configuration. Part i: Flow (velocity) field analysis. Nuclear Engineering
and Design 263: 473–489.
117. Shams, A., F. Roelofs, E.M.J. Komen, and E. Baglietto. 2013. Numerical simulations of a
pebble bed configuration using hybrid (rans-les) methods. Nuclear Engineering and Design
261: 201–211.
118. Yuh Ming Ferng and Kun-Yueh Lin. 2013. Investigating effects of bcc and fcc arrangements
on flow and heat transfer characteristics in pebbles through cfd methodology. Nuclear Engineering and Design 258: 66–75.
119. Yang, Xingtuan, Hu Wenping, and Shengyao Jiang. 2009. Experimental investigation on
feasibility of two-region-designed pebble-bed high-temperature gas-cooled reactor. Journal
of Nuclear Science & Technology 46 (4): 374–381.
120. Gui, N., X.T. Yang, J.Y. Tu, and S.Y. Jiang. 2014. A simple geometrical model for analyzing
particle dispersion in a gravity-driven monolayer granular bed. Powder Technology 254: 432–
438.
121. Li, Yu., Nan Gui, Xingtuan Yang, Tu Jiyuan, and Shengyao Jiang. 2016. Effect of friction on
pebble flow pattern in pebble bed reactor. Annals of Nuclear Energy 94: 32–43.
122. Li, Yu., Nan Gui, Xingtuan Yang, Tu Jiyuan, and Shengyao Jiang. 2016. Numerical study of
gravity-driven dense granular flows on flow behavior characterization. Powder Technology
297: 144–152.
123. Jia, Xinlong, Nan Gui, Wu Hao, Xingtuan Yang, Tu Jiyuan, and Shengyao Jiang. 2017.
Numerical study and analysis of the effects of recirculation flow rates in drained pebble flow.
Powder Technology 314: 608–619. Special Issue on Simulation and Modelling of Particulate
Systems.
124. Yang, Xingtuan, Nan Gui, Tu Jiyuan, and Shengyao Jiang. 2014. 3D DEM simulation and
analysis of void fraction distribution in a pebble bed high temperature reactor. Nuclear Engineering and Design 270 (Supplement C): 404–411.
125. Falahi, Fadha Al, Gary Mueller, and Muthanna Al-Dahhan. 2018. Pebble bed nuclear reactor
structure study: A comparison of the experimental and calculated void fraction distribution.
Progress in Nuclear Energy 106: 153–161.
126. Rycroft, C.H., G.S. Grest, J.W. Landry, and M.Z. Bazant. 2006. Analysis of granular flow in
a pebble-bed nuclear reactor. Physical Review E Statistical Nonlinear & Soft Matter Physics
74: 021306.
127. Sun, X.M., Y.J. Dong, P.F. Hao, L. Shi, F. Li, and Y.T. Feng. 2016. Three-dimensional numerical simulation of quasi-static pebble flow. Advanced Powder Technology 28 (2): 499–505.
128. Li, Yanjie, Xu Yong, and Shengyao Jiang. 2009. Dem simulations and experiments of pebble
flow with monosized spheres. Powder Technology 193 (3): 312–318. Special Issue: Discrete
Element Methods: The 4th International Conference on Discrete Element Methods.Special
Issue: Discrete Element Methods: The 4th International Conference on Discrete Element
Methods.
33
109. Von Der Decken, C.B. 1972. Mechanical problems of a pebble bed reactor core. Nuclear
Engineering & Design 18 (2): 323–333.
110. Kadak, A.C., and M.Z. Bazant. 2004. Pebble flow experiments for pebble-bed reactors. In
Proceedings of the Second International Topical Meeting on High Temperature Reactor Technology, Beijing, China.
111. Matzner, D. 2004. Pbmr executive overview. In Presentation at INET.
112. Yang, X.T., W.P. Hu, S.Y. Jiang, K.K.L. Wong, and J.Y. Tu. 2012. Mechanism analysis of quasistatic dense pebble flow in pebble bed reactor using phenomenological approach. Nuclear
Engineering and Design 250: 247–259.
113. Choi, Jaehyuk, Arshad Kudrolli, and Martin Z. Bazant. 2005. Velocity profile of granular flows
inside silos and hoppers. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 17 (24): S2533–S2548.
114. Choi, Jaehyuk, Arshad Kudrolli, R. Rosales Rodolfo, and Martin Z. Bazant. 2004. Diffusion
and mixing in gravity-driven dense granular flows. Physical Review Letters 92 (17): 174301.
115. Shams, Roelofs, M.J.E. Komen, and E. Baglietto. 2012. Optimization of a pebble bed configuration for quasi-direct numerical simulation. Nuclear Engineering & Design 242: 331–340.
116. Shams, A., F. Roelofs, E.M.J. Komen, and E. Baglietto. 2013. Quasi-direct numerical simulation of a pebble bed configuration. Part i: Flow (velocity) field analysis. Nuclear Engineering
and Design 263: 473–489.
117. Shams, A., F. Roelofs, E.M.J. Komen, and E. Baglietto. 2013. Numerical simulations of a
pebble bed configuration using hybrid (rans-les) methods. Nuclear Engineering and Design
261: 201–211.
118. Yuh Ming Ferng and Kun-Yueh Lin. 2013. Investigating effects of bcc and fcc arrangements
on flow and heat transfer characteristics in pebbles through cfd methodology. Nuclear Engineering and Design 258: 66–75.
119. Yang, Xingtuan, Hu Wenping, and Shengyao Jiang. 2009. Experimental investigation on
feasibility of two-region-designed pebble-bed high-temperature gas-cooled reactor. Journal
of Nuclear Science & Technology 46 (4): 374–381.
120. Gui, N., X.T. Yang, J.Y. Tu, and S.Y. Jiang. 2014. A simple geometrical model for analyzing
particle dispersion in a gravity-driven monolayer granular bed. Powder Technology 254: 432–
438.
121. Li, Yu., Nan Gui, Xingtuan Yang, Tu Jiyuan, and Shengyao Jiang. 2016. Effect of friction on
pebble flow pattern in pebble bed reactor. Annals of Nuclear Energy 94: 32–43.
122. Li, Yu., Nan Gui, Xingtuan Yang, Tu Jiyuan, and Shengyao Jiang. 2016. Numerical study of
gravity-driven dense granular flows on flow behavior characterization. Powder Technology
297: 144–152.
123. Jia, Xinlong, Nan Gui, Wu Hao, Xingtuan Yang, Tu Jiyuan, and Shengyao Jiang. 2017.
Numerical study and analysis of the effects of recirculation flow rates in drained pebble flow.
Powder Technology 314: 608–619. Special Issue on Simulation and Modelling of Particulate
Systems.
124. Yang, Xingtuan, Nan Gui, Tu Jiyuan, and Shengyao Jiang. 2014. 3D DEM simulation and
analysis of void fraction distribution in a pebble bed high temperature reactor. Nuclear Engineering and Design 270 (Supplement C): 404–411.
125. Falahi, Fadha Al, Gary Mueller, and Muthanna Al-Dahhan. 2018. Pebble bed nuclear reactor
structure study: A comparison of the experimental and calculated void fraction distribution.
Progress in Nuclear Energy 106: 153–161.
126. Rycroft, C.H., G.S. Grest, J.W. Landry, and M.Z. Bazant. 2006. Analysis of granular flow in
a pebble-bed nuclear reactor. Physical Review E Statistical Nonlinear & Soft Matter Physics
74: 021306.
127. Sun, X.M., Y.J. Dong, P.F. Hao, L. Shi, F. Li, and Y.T. Feng. 2016. Three-dimensional numerical simulation of quasi-static pebble flow. Advanced Powder Technology 28 (2): 499–505.
128. Li, Yanjie, Xu Yong, and Shengyao Jiang. 2009. Dem simulations and experiments of pebble
flow with monosized spheres. Powder Technology 193 (3): 312–318. Special Issue: Discrete
Element Methods: The 4th International Conference on Discrete Element Methods.Special
Issue: Discrete Element Methods: The 4th International Conference on Discrete Element
Methods.