72
fi eldwork and group work at the students’ initiative almost every day. Figure 4.6
shows scenes of group work and on-the-fi eld activities. Since the symposium presentation on the group work outcomes was separate from the fi eld program schedule
this time, the schedule was less packed than that in 2009, and we were able to give
the students more time for discussion. After the program in the fi eld, summary
reports were submitted and wrap-up presentations were conducted at UT. Afterward,
the outcomes of the group work were presented as posters in the 9th SEAWE held
in Bangkok on December 1–3, 2011.
4.4 Results and Reviews of the Thailand Unit
4.4.1 Group Work Results
To examine the educational effects of the unit programs in terms of their academic
contents, the group work results are presented in this subsection. Details are summarized in Table 4.3 for the case in 2009 and in Table 4.4 for the case in 2011.
Fig. 4.4 Scenes of fi eld activities in 2009. ( a ) Interview survey at the recycling market. ( b ) Waste
transfer station. ( c ) Leachate test at the Sainoi landfi ll site. ( d ) Sainoi landfi ll site
T. Hoshiko and T. Akiyama
fi eldwork and group work at the students’ initiative almost every day. Figure 4.6
shows scenes of group work and on-the-fi eld activities. Since the symposium presentation on the group work outcomes was separate from the fi eld program schedule
this time, the schedule was less packed than that in 2009, and we were able to give
the students more time for discussion. After the program in the fi eld, summary
reports were submitted and wrap-up presentations were conducted at UT. Afterward,
the outcomes of the group work were presented as posters in the 9th SEAWE held
in Bangkok on December 1–3, 2011.
4.4 Results and Reviews of the Thailand Unit
4.4.1 Group Work Results
To examine the educational effects of the unit programs in terms of their academic
contents, the group work results are presented in this subsection. Details are summarized in Table 4.3 for the case in 2009 and in Table 4.4 for the case in 2011.
Fig. 4.4 Scenes of fi eld activities in 2009. ( a ) Interview survey at the recycling market. ( b ) Waste
transfer station. ( c ) Leachate test at the Sainoi landfi ll site. ( d ) Sainoi landfi ll site
T. Hoshiko and T. Akiyama