5.6 Summary
109
to the differing responses of the metallic and semiconducting nanotubes that comprise the film. No unusual behaviour was observed in the electromagnon response
in CuO up to electric fields of ∼280 kV cm
−1 , however higher field strengths provide tantalising evidence of a field-dependent increase in the oscillator strength of
the electromagnon. Results presented here on these two systems are very much in
the preliminary stage, however they provide sufficient evidence to suggest future
investigations into their nonlinear properties may prove fruitful.
References
1. Mukai Y, Hirori H, Tanaka K (2013) Phys Rev B 87:201202
2. Ewers B et al (2012) Phys Rev B 85:075307
3. Kuehn W et al (2010) Phys Rev Lett 104:146602
4. Bowlan P et al (2011) Phys Rev Lett 107:256602
5. Su FH et al (2009) Opt Express 17:9620
6. Razzari L et al (2009) Phys Rev B 79:193204
7. Hebling J, Hoffmann MC, Hwang HY, Yeh K-L, Nelson KA (2010) Phys Rev B 81:035201
8. Hoffmann MC, Hebling J, Hwang HY, Yeh K-L, Nelson KA (2009) J Opt Soc Amer B 26:A29
9. Ho I-C, Zhang X-C (2011) Appl Phys Lett 98:241908
10. Tani S, Blanchard F, Tanaka K (2012) Phys Rev Lett 109:166603
11. Shin HJ, Nguyen VL, Lim SC, Son J-H (2018) J Phys B: At Mol Opt Phys 51:144003
12. Watanabe S, Minami N, Shimano R (2011) Opt Express 19:1528
13. Katayama I et al (2012) Phys Rev Lett 108:097401
14. Kozina M et al (2017) Str Dyn 4:054301
15. Matsunaga R, Shimano R (2012) Phys Rev Lett 109:2
16. Dienst A et al (2013) Nat Mater 12:535
17. Wang Z et al (2008) J Appl Phys 103:123905
18. Vicario C et al (2013) Nat Photon 7:720
19. Kampfrath T et al (2011) Nat Photon 5:31
20. Yamaguchi K, Nakajima M, Suemoto T (2010) Phys Rev Lett 105:3
21. Jin Z et al (2013) Phys Rev B 87:094422
22. Hamster H, Falcone RW (1990) Ultrafast Phenomena VII, vol 53. Springer Series in Chemical
Physics, Springer, Berlin
23. Hamster H, Sullivan A, Gordon S, White W, Falcone RW (1993) Phys Rev Lett 71:2725
24. Hamster H, Sullivan A, Gordon S, Falcone RW (1994) Phys Rev E 49:671
25. Thomson MD, Kreß M, Löffler T, Roskos HG (2007) Laser Photon Rev 1:349
26. Löffler T, Jacob F, Roskos HG (2000) Appl Phys Lett 77:453
27. Löffler T, Roskos HG (2002) J Appl Phys 91:2611
28. Kreß M et al (2006) Nat Phys 2:327
29. Cook DJ, Hochstrasser RM (2000) Opt Lett 25:1210
30. Kim K-Y, Glownia JH, Taylor AJ, Rodriguez G (2007) Opt Express 15:4577
31. Karpowicz N, Lu X, Zhang X-C (2009) J Mod Opt 56:1137
32. Seifert T et al (2017) Appl Phys Lett 110:252402
33. Hibberd MT et al (2019) Appl Phys Lett 114:031101
34. Beck M et al (2010) Opt Express 18:9251
35. Monoszlai B, Vicario C, Jazbinsek M, Hauri CP (2013) Opt Lett 38:5106
36. Vicario C et al (2015) Opt Express 23:4573
37. Hebling J, Almasi G, Kozma I, Kuhl J (2002) Opt Express 10:1161
38. Hirori H, Doi A, Blanchard F, Tanaka K (2011) Appl Phys Lett 98:091106
39. Shao D et al (2018) Nanotechnology 29:145203
109
to the differing responses of the metallic and semiconducting nanotubes that comprise the film. No unusual behaviour was observed in the electromagnon response
in CuO up to electric fields of ∼280 kV cm
−1 , however higher field strengths provide tantalising evidence of a field-dependent increase in the oscillator strength of
the electromagnon. Results presented here on these two systems are very much in
the preliminary stage, however they provide sufficient evidence to suggest future
investigations into their nonlinear properties may prove fruitful.
References
1. Mukai Y, Hirori H, Tanaka K (2013) Phys Rev B 87:201202
2. Ewers B et al (2012) Phys Rev B 85:075307
3. Kuehn W et al (2010) Phys Rev Lett 104:146602
4. Bowlan P et al (2011) Phys Rev Lett 107:256602
5. Su FH et al (2009) Opt Express 17:9620
6. Razzari L et al (2009) Phys Rev B 79:193204
7. Hebling J, Hoffmann MC, Hwang HY, Yeh K-L, Nelson KA (2010) Phys Rev B 81:035201
8. Hoffmann MC, Hebling J, Hwang HY, Yeh K-L, Nelson KA (2009) J Opt Soc Amer B 26:A29
9. Ho I-C, Zhang X-C (2011) Appl Phys Lett 98:241908
10. Tani S, Blanchard F, Tanaka K (2012) Phys Rev Lett 109:166603
11. Shin HJ, Nguyen VL, Lim SC, Son J-H (2018) J Phys B: At Mol Opt Phys 51:144003
12. Watanabe S, Minami N, Shimano R (2011) Opt Express 19:1528
13. Katayama I et al (2012) Phys Rev Lett 108:097401
14. Kozina M et al (2017) Str Dyn 4:054301
15. Matsunaga R, Shimano R (2012) Phys Rev Lett 109:2
16. Dienst A et al (2013) Nat Mater 12:535
17. Wang Z et al (2008) J Appl Phys 103:123905
18. Vicario C et al (2013) Nat Photon 7:720
19. Kampfrath T et al (2011) Nat Photon 5:31
20. Yamaguchi K, Nakajima M, Suemoto T (2010) Phys Rev Lett 105:3
21. Jin Z et al (2013) Phys Rev B 87:094422
22. Hamster H, Falcone RW (1990) Ultrafast Phenomena VII, vol 53. Springer Series in Chemical
Physics, Springer, Berlin
23. Hamster H, Sullivan A, Gordon S, White W, Falcone RW (1993) Phys Rev Lett 71:2725
24. Hamster H, Sullivan A, Gordon S, Falcone RW (1994) Phys Rev E 49:671
25. Thomson MD, Kreß M, Löffler T, Roskos HG (2007) Laser Photon Rev 1:349
26. Löffler T, Jacob F, Roskos HG (2000) Appl Phys Lett 77:453
27. Löffler T, Roskos HG (2002) J Appl Phys 91:2611
28. Kreß M et al (2006) Nat Phys 2:327
29. Cook DJ, Hochstrasser RM (2000) Opt Lett 25:1210
30. Kim K-Y, Glownia JH, Taylor AJ, Rodriguez G (2007) Opt Express 15:4577
31. Karpowicz N, Lu X, Zhang X-C (2009) J Mod Opt 56:1137
32. Seifert T et al (2017) Appl Phys Lett 110:252402
33. Hibberd MT et al (2019) Appl Phys Lett 114:031101
34. Beck M et al (2010) Opt Express 18:9251
35. Monoszlai B, Vicario C, Jazbinsek M, Hauri CP (2013) Opt Lett 38:5106
36. Vicario C et al (2015) Opt Express 23:4573
37. Hebling J, Almasi G, Kozma I, Kuhl J (2002) Opt Express 10:1161
38. Hirori H, Doi A, Blanchard F, Tanaka K (2011) Appl Phys Lett 98:091106
39. Shao D et al (2018) Nanotechnology 29:145203