The Technological Project for the Enhancement of Rural Heritage
75
and the potential of the considered areas. Starting from this formalization, it is therefore possible to activate cooperation and active participation processes involving local
institutions, stakeholders, economic operators and local communities, to gather ideas,
needs and willingness to participate in the implementation of the interventions. This
type of process is not immediate, especially in contexts that express a lack of dialogue and the search for a balance between different interests, but it can find supports
through the dissemination of best practices and the direct comparison with “virtuous”
local systems (Riva 2017). Therefore, the results of the participation process can be
translated into a strategic plan for the enhancement of the rural heritage that expresses
an integrated and organic vision in the broad territorial context, structured through the
sharing of lines of action and pilot projects, selected on the basis of the significance of
the interventions, on their replicability and on the financing opportunities that can be
activated. The more the projects will be able to balance and integrate the ecologicalenvironmental, landscape-fruitive, economic-productive and socio-inclusive values,
the higher will be the possibility of triggering long-lasting processes of enhancement
of rural heritage, with positive effects for the urban environment as well.
References
Agosti, C., & Riva, R. (2014). Rehabilitation and enhancement among culture, nature and landscape.
Master plan and guidelines for Bonoris Courts heritage in Mantua. In R. Amoêda, S. Lira & C.
Pinheiro (Eds.), REHAB 2014. In Proceedings of the international conference on Preservation,
maintenance and rehabilitation of historical buildings and structures (pp. 9–18). Barcelos: Green
Line Institute for Sustainable Development.
Bolici, R. (Ed.). (2015). Il progetto tecnologico per la valorizzazione del patrimonio rurale. Maggioli, Santarcangelo di Romagna: Nuove prospettive per il paesaggio dell’Oglio Po.
Council for Agricultural Science and Technology. (2002). Urban and agricultural communities:
Opportunities for common ground. Ames, Iowa: Task Force Report 138.
Fanzini, D., Tartaglia, A., & Riva, R. (2019). Project challenges: sustainable development and
urban resilience. Maggioli: Santarcangelo di Romagna (in press).
Gruppo di lavoro “Policy dell’Architettura per la Green Economy nelle Città” (2017). Verso
l’attuazione del Manifesto della Green Economy per l’architettura e l’urbanistica. Obiettivi,
ambiti di indirizzo, strategie prioritarie. Consiglio Nazionale della Green Economy.
Magnaghi, A., & Fanfani, D. (2010). Patto città campagna: un progetto di bioregione urbana per
la Toscana centrale. Firenze: Alinea.
Malcevschi, S., Mussinelli, E., Tartaglia, A., & Andreucci, B. (2017). Safeguard of the environment
and the agricultural soil, enhancement of the water capital and green infrastructures. In E. Antonini
& F. Tucci (Eds.), Architecture, cities and territory towards a Green Economy. Milano: Edizioni
Ambiente.
Mussinelli, E., & Cerati, D. (2017). The potential of rural suburban systems for metropolitan
resilience. Research and experimentation in Milan’s context. In V. D’Ambrosio & M. F. Leone
(Eds.), Environmental Design for Climate Change adaptation (pp. 250–263). Napoli: CLEAN.
Mussinelli, E. (2014a). Improvement of heritage and landscape in periurban and rural areas. In
Proceedings of the 1st international conference Preservation and improvement of historic town
(pp. 257–275). Beograd: Jp Službeni glasnik.
Mussinelli, E. (Ed.). (2014b). La valorizzazione del patrimonio ambientale e paesaggistico. Maggioli, Santarcangelo di Romagna: Progetto per le Corti Bonoris nel Parco del Mincio.
75
and the potential of the considered areas. Starting from this formalization, it is therefore possible to activate cooperation and active participation processes involving local
institutions, stakeholders, economic operators and local communities, to gather ideas,
needs and willingness to participate in the implementation of the interventions. This
type of process is not immediate, especially in contexts that express a lack of dialogue and the search for a balance between different interests, but it can find supports
through the dissemination of best practices and the direct comparison with “virtuous”
local systems (Riva 2017). Therefore, the results of the participation process can be
translated into a strategic plan for the enhancement of the rural heritage that expresses
an integrated and organic vision in the broad territorial context, structured through the
sharing of lines of action and pilot projects, selected on the basis of the significance of
the interventions, on their replicability and on the financing opportunities that can be
activated. The more the projects will be able to balance and integrate the ecologicalenvironmental, landscape-fruitive, economic-productive and socio-inclusive values,
the higher will be the possibility of triggering long-lasting processes of enhancement
of rural heritage, with positive effects for the urban environment as well.
References
Agosti, C., & Riva, R. (2014). Rehabilitation and enhancement among culture, nature and landscape.
Master plan and guidelines for Bonoris Courts heritage in Mantua. In R. Amoêda, S. Lira & C.
Pinheiro (Eds.), REHAB 2014. In Proceedings of the international conference on Preservation,
maintenance and rehabilitation of historical buildings and structures (pp. 9–18). Barcelos: Green
Line Institute for Sustainable Development.
Bolici, R. (Ed.). (2015). Il progetto tecnologico per la valorizzazione del patrimonio rurale. Maggioli, Santarcangelo di Romagna: Nuove prospettive per il paesaggio dell’Oglio Po.
Council for Agricultural Science and Technology. (2002). Urban and agricultural communities:
Opportunities for common ground. Ames, Iowa: Task Force Report 138.
Fanzini, D., Tartaglia, A., & Riva, R. (2019). Project challenges: sustainable development and
urban resilience. Maggioli: Santarcangelo di Romagna (in press).
Gruppo di lavoro “Policy dell’Architettura per la Green Economy nelle Città” (2017). Verso
l’attuazione del Manifesto della Green Economy per l’architettura e l’urbanistica. Obiettivi,
ambiti di indirizzo, strategie prioritarie. Consiglio Nazionale della Green Economy.
Magnaghi, A., & Fanfani, D. (2010). Patto città campagna: un progetto di bioregione urbana per
la Toscana centrale. Firenze: Alinea.
Malcevschi, S., Mussinelli, E., Tartaglia, A., & Andreucci, B. (2017). Safeguard of the environment
and the agricultural soil, enhancement of the water capital and green infrastructures. In E. Antonini
& F. Tucci (Eds.), Architecture, cities and territory towards a Green Economy. Milano: Edizioni
Ambiente.
Mussinelli, E., & Cerati, D. (2017). The potential of rural suburban systems for metropolitan
resilience. Research and experimentation in Milan’s context. In V. D’Ambrosio & M. F. Leone
(Eds.), Environmental Design for Climate Change adaptation (pp. 250–263). Napoli: CLEAN.
Mussinelli, E. (2014a). Improvement of heritage and landscape in periurban and rural areas. In
Proceedings of the 1st international conference Preservation and improvement of historic town
(pp. 257–275). Beograd: Jp Službeni glasnik.
Mussinelli, E. (Ed.). (2014b). La valorizzazione del patrimonio ambientale e paesaggistico. Maggioli, Santarcangelo di Romagna: Progetto per le Corti Bonoris nel Parco del Mincio.