and the effectiveness of local development policies in different contexts characterized by different territorial capital endowments.
The second group of papers sets as well the analysis at the urban scale while
focusing on single areas/neighbourhoods within cities. Within this group, two
subgroups can be identified depending on the specific dimension emphasized in the
analysis. The former focuses on the analysis of territorial transformation in specific
areas of a city while the latter concentrates on the technological project dimension
of such transformations.
In the first subgroup, Merlini offers a conceptual reflection on the relationship
between territorial regeneration and demolition. She proposes a new interpretation
of this link that departs from the view of demolition as reparation or precondition
for a valourization project. Instead, she proposes a view on demolition as a project
tool for the reconfiguration and transformation of the built environment. Sdino et al.
propose an overview of the state of the art of evaluation methods for the economic
assessment of urban transformations complemented by the analysis of a peri-urban
transformation in Italy.
In the second subgroup, Mussinelli et al. discuss public spaces valourization,
urban landscape requalification, adaptive regeneration of degraded areas and
advance a new approach to project development with the aim of targeting sustainability and resilience to climate change. Next, Mussinelli et al. reflect on the
relevance of integrated and multidisciplinary approaches for peri-urban landscape
project development, for architectural heritage valourization and for agriculture
socio-economic value in the management of places. Lastly, Pavesi et al. propose a
case study analysis on the possible drivers and strategies to improve real estate
management, resources and processes and their valourization according to a social
and circular economy perspective.
2
Socio-Economic Development and Regeneration of Territories
The second group of papers sets as well the analysis at the urban scale while
focusing on single areas/neighbourhoods within cities. Within this group, two
subgroups can be identified depending on the specific dimension emphasized in the
analysis. The former focuses on the analysis of territorial transformation in specific
areas of a city while the latter concentrates on the technological project dimension
of such transformations.
In the first subgroup, Merlini offers a conceptual reflection on the relationship
between territorial regeneration and demolition. She proposes a new interpretation
of this link that departs from the view of demolition as reparation or precondition
for a valourization project. Instead, she proposes a view on demolition as a project
tool for the reconfiguration and transformation of the built environment. Sdino et al.
propose an overview of the state of the art of evaluation methods for the economic
assessment of urban transformations complemented by the analysis of a peri-urban
transformation in Italy.
In the second subgroup, Mussinelli et al. discuss public spaces valourization,
urban landscape requalification, adaptive regeneration of degraded areas and
advance a new approach to project development with the aim of targeting sustainability and resilience to climate change. Next, Mussinelli et al. reflect on the
relevance of integrated and multidisciplinary approaches for peri-urban landscape
project development, for architectural heritage valourization and for agriculture
socio-economic value in the management of places. Lastly, Pavesi et al. propose a
case study analysis on the possible drivers and strategies to improve real estate
management, resources and processes and their valourization according to a social
and circular economy perspective.
2
Socio-Economic Development and Regeneration of Territories