13
1.6 Scope and Structure of this Book
This book aims at examining different types of framing applied by scholars to sustainability research. In so doing, this book provides an overall picture of sustainability research by scholars from different academic backgrounds (i.e., representing
different ontologies and epistemologies). As efforts continue in achieving sustainable development goals and trying to guide society to sustainability, realizing different intentions behind each framing and being open to negotiation as well as
cooperation are important for sustainability experts. The first step in starting such an
approach is gaining understanding of one another’s framings.
References
Bammer G (2005) Integration and implementation sciences: building a new specialization. Ecol
Soc 10(2). Retrieved from http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss2/art6/
Benford RD, Snow DA (2000) Framing processes and social movements: an overview and assessment. Annu Rev Sociol 26:611–639. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/223459
Bettencourt LMA, Kaur J (2011) Evolution and structure of sustainability science. P Nat Acad Sci
USA 108(49):19540–19545. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1102712108
Chapin FS, Pickett ST, Power ME, Jackson RB, Carter DM, Duke C (2011) Earth stewardship: a
strategy for social–ecological transformation to reverse planetary degradation. J Environ Stud
Sci 1(1):44–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-011-0010-7
UNESCO Chetto AM (ed) (2000) World conference on science: Science for the twenty-first century: A New Commitment. Paris Retrieved from https://www.google.co.jp/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwjBkdXdienRAhUExrw
KHW_aB-EQFggcMAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Funesdoc.unesco.org%2Fimages%2F0012%
2F001207%2F120706e.pdf&usg=AFQjCNEf9N61lstsq2oJUzorEQGCgLMBXA
Chong D, Druckman JN (2007) Framing theory. Annu Rev Polit Sci 10:103–126. https://doi.
org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.072805.103054
Clark WC (2007) Sustainability science: a room of its own. P Natl Acad Sci USA 104(6):1737.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0611291104
Clark WC, Dickson NM (2003) Sustainability science: the emerging research program. P Natl
Acad Sci USA 100(14):8059–8061. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1231333100
Fiksel J (2003) Designing resilient, sustainable systems. Environ Sci Technol 37(23):5330–5339.
Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14700317
Gamson WA, Mondigliani A, Modigliani A (1989) Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear
power: a constructionist approach. Amer J Sociol 95(1):1–37. https://doi.org/10.1086/229213
Giampietro M (2002) Complexity and scales: the challenge for integrated assessment. Integrat
Asses 3:247–265. Retrieved from http://journals.sfu.ca/int_assess/index.php/iaj/article/
viewArticle/33
Goffman E (1974) Frame analysis: an essay on the organization of experience. Northeastern
University Press, York, Pennsylvania
Hiramatsu M (2012) Sasuteinabiriti-gaku ni okeru shakaigakuteki shiten (Dai-ippou) [Sociological
Perspective in Sustainability Science I: From IR3S (サステイナビリティ学における社
会学的視点(第1報))]. 名古屋女子大学 紀要, 58, 101–108. Retrieved from https://www.
google.co.jp/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0a
hUKEwit6K3i7uvRAhWHTbwKHVOvBdMQFggcMAA&url=https%3A%2F%2Fnago
ya-wu.repo.nii.ac.jp%2F%3Faction%3Drepository_action_common_download%26item_
id%3D1313%26item_no%3D1%26attri
1 Framing in Sustainability Science
Précédent

- 21/196

Suivant