83
Ruckelshaus M, McKenzie E, Tallis H et al (2015) Notes from the field: lessons learned from using
ecosystem service approaches to inform real-world decisions. Ecol Econ 115:11–21. https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.07.009
Saarikoski H, Mustajoki J, Barton DN et al (2016) Multi-criteria decision analysis and cost-benefit
analysis: comparing alternative frameworks for integrated valuation of ecosystem services.
Ecosyst Serv:0–1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.10.014
Sanon S, Hein T, Douven W, Winkler P (2012) Quantifying ecosystem service trade-offs: the
case of an urban floodplain in Vienna, Austria. J  Environ Manage 111:159–172. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.06.008
Santos-Martin F, Viinikka A, Mononen L et al (2018) Creating an operational database for ecosystems services mapping and assessment methods. One Ecosyst 3:e26719. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.jlp.2005.07.001
Säumel I, Weber F, Kowarik I (2016) Toward livable and healthy urban streets: roadside vegetation
provides ecosystem services where people live and move. Environ Sci Policy 62:24–33. https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.11.012
Schleyer C, Görg C, Hauck J, Winkler KJ (2015) Opportunities and challenges for mainstreaming
the ecosystem services concept in the multi-level policy-making within the EU. Ecosyst Serv
16:174–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.10.014
Schröter M, Remme RP, Hein L (2012) How and where to map supply and demand of ecosystem services for policy-relevant outcomes? Ecol Indic 23:220–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
ecolind.2012.03.025
Schröter M, Albert C, Marques A et al (2016) National ecosystem assessments in Europe: a review.
Bioscience 66:813–828. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biw101
Schwarz N, Bauer A, Haase D (2011) Assessing climate impacts of planning policies – An estimation for the urban region of Leipzig (Germany). Environ Impact Assess Rev 31:97–111. https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2010.02.002
Sen A (2009) The idea of justice. Penguin Books, London
Shashua-Bar L, Hoffman ME (2000) Vegetation as a climatic component in the design of an urban
street. Energy Build 31:221–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7788(99)00018-3
Skelhorn C, Lindley S, Levermore G (2014) The impact of vegetation types on air and surface
temperatures in a temperate city: a fine scale assessment in Manchester, UK. Landsc Urban
Plan 121:129–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.09.012
Smith P, Ashmore MR, Black HIJ et al (2013) REVIEW: the role of ecosystems and their management in regulating climate, and soil, water and air quality. J Appl Ecol 50:812–829. https://doi.
org/10.1111/1365-2664.12016
Souch CA, Souch C (1993) The effect of trees on summertime below canopy urban climates: a
case study Bloomington, Indiana. J Arboric 19:303–312
Spake R, Lasseur R, Crouzat E et al (2017) Unpacking ecosystem service bundles: towards predictive mapping of synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem services. Glob Environ Chang
47:37–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.08.004
Stessens P, Khan AZ, Huysmans M, Canters F (2017) Analysing urban green space accessibility
and quality: a GIS-based model as spatial decision support for urban ecosystem services in
Brussels. Ecosyst Serv 28:328–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.10.016
Strohbach MW, Haase D (2012) Above-ground carbon storage by urban trees in Leipzig,
Germany: analysis of patterns in a European city. Landsc Urban Plan 104:95–104. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.10.001
Syrbe RU, Walz U (2012) Spatial indicators for the assessment of ecosystem services: providing, benefiting and connecting areas and landscape metrics. Ecol Indic 21:80–88. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.02.013
Taha H, Akbari H, Rosenfeld A (1991) Heat island and oasis effects of vegetative canopies: micrometeorological field-measurements. Theor Appl Climatol 44:123–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/
BF00867999
References
Précédent

- 92/96

Suivant