143
IPBES (Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services)
(2015) Preliminary guide regarding diverse conceptualization of multiple values of nature and
its benefits, including biodiversity and ecosystem functions and services (deliverable 3(d)).
IPBES/4/INF/13
IPBES (Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services)
(2018) Summary for policymakers of the regional assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services for Asia and the Pacific of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on
Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. IPBES Secretariat, Bonn. (41 pages)
Jacobs S, Dendoncker N, Martín-López B, Barton DN, Gomez-Baggethun E, Boeraeve F, McGrath
FL, Vierikko K, Geneletti D, Sevecke KJ, Pipart N, Primmer E, Mederly P, Schmidt S, Aragão
A, Baral H, Bark RH, Briceno T, Brogna D, Cabral P, De Vreese R, Liquete C, Mueller H, Peh
KSH, Phelan A, Rincón Ruiz A, Rogers SH, Turkelboom F, Van Reeth W, van Zanten BT, Wam
HK, Washbourne CL (2016) A new valuation school: integrating diverse values of nature in
resource and land use decisions. Ecosyst Serv 22(b):213–220
Katayama N, Baba YG, Kusumoto Y, Tanaka K (2015) A review of postwar changes in rice farming and biodiversity in Japan. Agric Syst 132:73–84
Khan K, Ikram, M, Takahi, S, Iqbal R (2017) Socio-ecological landscape change as a preamble
to mountainous urban watershed rejuvenation, Kanshi of the Jhelum River Basin, Potohar
Plateau, Pakistan. Case studies, International Partnership for the Satoyama Initiative. https://
satoyama-initiative.org/casestudies
Kieninger PR, Yamaji E, Penker M (2011) Urban people as paddy farmers: the Japanese
Tanada Ownership System discussed from a European perspective. Renew Agric Food Syst
26(4):328–341
Knight C (2010) The discourse of “encultured nature” in Japan: the concept of Satoyama and its
role in 21st century nature conservation. Asian Stud Rev 34(4):421–441
Kohsaka R, Shih W, Saito O, Sadohara S (2013) Local assessment of Tokyo: Satoyama and
satoumi—traditional landscapes and management practices in a contemporary urban environment. In: Elmqvist T, Fragkias M, Goodness J, Güneralp B, Marcotullio PJ, McDonald
RI, Parnell S, Schewenius M, Sendstad M, Seto KC, Wilkinson C (eds) Urbanization, biodiversity and ecosystem services: challenges and opportunities: a global assessment. Springer,
Dordrecht, pp 93–105
Kozar R, Galang E, Alip A, Sedhain J, Subramanian SM, Saito O (2019) Multi-level networks for
sustainability solutions: the case of the International Partnership for the Satoyama Initiative.
Curr Opin Environ Sustain 39:123–134
Kumar BM, Takeuchi K (2009) Agroforestry in the Western Ghats of peninsular India and the
satoyama landscapes of Japan: a comparison of two sustainable land use systems. Sustain Sci
4(2):215–232
Li S, Li X (2016) Progress and prospect on farmland abandonment. Dili Xuebao/Acta Geogr Sin
71(3):370–389
MA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment) (2005) Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems
and human well-being: synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC. (155 pages)
Marady I, Sokla H, Mary S (2011) Role and involvement of the commune council in community
forestry activities in Domnak Neak Tathmor Puan. Case studies, International Partnership for
the Satoyama Initiative. https://satoyama-initiative.org/casestudies
Matsui T, Kawashima T, Kasahara T (2010) Town revitalization making the most of natural
landscape and traditions of Kanakura Wajima City, Ishikawa Prefecture, Japan. Case studies,
International Partnership for the Satoyama Initiative. https://satoyama-initiative.org/casestudies
Morimoto Y (2011) What is Satoyama? Points for discussion on its future direction. Landsc Ecol
Eng 7(2):163–171
MRDC (Montañosa Research and Development Center), Tebtebba Foundation (2012) Role of
traditional knowledge in strengthening socio-ecological production landscapes. Case studies,
International Partnership for the Satoyama Initiative. https://satoyama-initiative.org/casestudies
7 Place-Based Solutions for Conservation and Restoration of Social-Ecological…
IPBES (Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services)
(2015) Preliminary guide regarding diverse conceptualization of multiple values of nature and
its benefits, including biodiversity and ecosystem functions and services (deliverable 3(d)).
IPBES/4/INF/13
IPBES (Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services)
(2018) Summary for policymakers of the regional assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services for Asia and the Pacific of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on
Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. IPBES Secretariat, Bonn. (41 pages)
Jacobs S, Dendoncker N, Martín-López B, Barton DN, Gomez-Baggethun E, Boeraeve F, McGrath
FL, Vierikko K, Geneletti D, Sevecke KJ, Pipart N, Primmer E, Mederly P, Schmidt S, Aragão
A, Baral H, Bark RH, Briceno T, Brogna D, Cabral P, De Vreese R, Liquete C, Mueller H, Peh
KSH, Phelan A, Rincón Ruiz A, Rogers SH, Turkelboom F, Van Reeth W, van Zanten BT, Wam
HK, Washbourne CL (2016) A new valuation school: integrating diverse values of nature in
resource and land use decisions. Ecosyst Serv 22(b):213–220
Katayama N, Baba YG, Kusumoto Y, Tanaka K (2015) A review of postwar changes in rice farming and biodiversity in Japan. Agric Syst 132:73–84
Khan K, Ikram, M, Takahi, S, Iqbal R (2017) Socio-ecological landscape change as a preamble
to mountainous urban watershed rejuvenation, Kanshi of the Jhelum River Basin, Potohar
Plateau, Pakistan. Case studies, International Partnership for the Satoyama Initiative. https://
satoyama-initiative.org/casestudies
Kieninger PR, Yamaji E, Penker M (2011) Urban people as paddy farmers: the Japanese
Tanada Ownership System discussed from a European perspective. Renew Agric Food Syst
26(4):328–341
Knight C (2010) The discourse of “encultured nature” in Japan: the concept of Satoyama and its
role in 21st century nature conservation. Asian Stud Rev 34(4):421–441
Kohsaka R, Shih W, Saito O, Sadohara S (2013) Local assessment of Tokyo: Satoyama and
satoumi—traditional landscapes and management practices in a contemporary urban environment. In: Elmqvist T, Fragkias M, Goodness J, Güneralp B, Marcotullio PJ, McDonald
RI, Parnell S, Schewenius M, Sendstad M, Seto KC, Wilkinson C (eds) Urbanization, biodiversity and ecosystem services: challenges and opportunities: a global assessment. Springer,
Dordrecht, pp 93–105
Kozar R, Galang E, Alip A, Sedhain J, Subramanian SM, Saito O (2019) Multi-level networks for
sustainability solutions: the case of the International Partnership for the Satoyama Initiative.
Curr Opin Environ Sustain 39:123–134
Kumar BM, Takeuchi K (2009) Agroforestry in the Western Ghats of peninsular India and the
satoyama landscapes of Japan: a comparison of two sustainable land use systems. Sustain Sci
4(2):215–232
Li S, Li X (2016) Progress and prospect on farmland abandonment. Dili Xuebao/Acta Geogr Sin
71(3):370–389
MA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment) (2005) Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems
and human well-being: synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC. (155 pages)
Marady I, Sokla H, Mary S (2011) Role and involvement of the commune council in community
forestry activities in Domnak Neak Tathmor Puan. Case studies, International Partnership for
the Satoyama Initiative. https://satoyama-initiative.org/casestudies
Matsui T, Kawashima T, Kasahara T (2010) Town revitalization making the most of natural
landscape and traditions of Kanakura Wajima City, Ishikawa Prefecture, Japan. Case studies,
International Partnership for the Satoyama Initiative. https://satoyama-initiative.org/casestudies
Morimoto Y (2011) What is Satoyama? Points for discussion on its future direction. Landsc Ecol
Eng 7(2):163–171
MRDC (Montañosa Research and Development Center), Tebtebba Foundation (2012) Role of
traditional knowledge in strengthening socio-ecological production landscapes. Case studies,
International Partnership for the Satoyama Initiative. https://satoyama-initiative.org/casestudies
7 Place-Based Solutions for Conservation and Restoration of Social-Ecological…