69. D. Woods, Creating Foresight: How Resilience Engineering Can Transform NASA’s
Approach to Risky Decision Making. Testimony on the Future of NASA for Committee on
Commerce, Sciences and Transportation, John McCain Chair (2003)
70. A. Winston, Resilience in a hotter world. Harv. Bus. Rev. (2014)
71. H. Smet, P. Lagadec, J. Leysen, Disasters out of the box: a new ballgame? J. Conting. Crisis
Manage. 20(3), 138–148 (2012)
72. ASIS, Organizational Resilience: Security, Preparedness, and Continuity Management
Systems-Requirements with Guidance for Use (American Nationals Standards Institute, 2009)
73. D. Snowden, Complex acts of knowing—paradox, and descriptive self-awareness. Journal of
Knowledge Management 6(2), 100–111 (2002)
74. J. Rasmussen, Risk management in a dynamic society: A modeling problem. Saf. Sci. 27,
183–213 (1997)
75. S. Dekker, E. Hollnagel, D. Woods, R. Cook, Resilience Engineering: New directions for
measuring and maintaining safety in complex systems. Final Report, November 2008. Lund
University School of Aviation (2008)
76. R. Westrum, Cultures with requisite imagination, in Verification and Validation of Complex
Systems: Human Factors Issues, NATO ASI Series, ed. by J.A. Wise, V.D. Hopkin, P Stager,
vol. 110 (Springer, Berlin, 1993), pp. 401–446
77. M.H. Schafer, T.P. Shippee, K.F. Ferraro, When does disadvantage not accumulate? Toward
a sociological conceptualization of resilience. Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Soziologie 35(2),
231–251 (2009)
78. S.E. Hobfoll, Stress, Culture, and Community: The Psychology and Philosophy of Stress
(Plenum, New York, 1998)
79. E.H. Powley, Reclaiming resilience and safety: Resilience activation in the critical period of
crisis. Human Rel. 62(9) (2009)
80. K.M. Suttcliffe, T.J. Vogus, Organizing for resilience, in Positive Organizational
Scholarship: Foundations of a New Discipline, ed. by K.S. Cameron, J.E. Dutton, R.E.
Quinn (Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco, CA, 2003), pp. 94–110
81. F. Guarnieri, S. Travadel, Engineering thinking in emergency situations: a new nuclear safety
concept. The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 70(6), 79 (2014)
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing,
adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate
credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and
indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter’s Creative
Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not
included in the chapter’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by
statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from
the copyright holder.
The Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Accident: Entering …
17
Approach to Risky Decision Making. Testimony on the Future of NASA for Committee on
Commerce, Sciences and Transportation, John McCain Chair (2003)
70. A. Winston, Resilience in a hotter world. Harv. Bus. Rev. (2014)
71. H. Smet, P. Lagadec, J. Leysen, Disasters out of the box: a new ballgame? J. Conting. Crisis
Manage. 20(3), 138–148 (2012)
72. ASIS, Organizational Resilience: Security, Preparedness, and Continuity Management
Systems-Requirements with Guidance for Use (American Nationals Standards Institute, 2009)
73. D. Snowden, Complex acts of knowing—paradox, and descriptive self-awareness. Journal of
Knowledge Management 6(2), 100–111 (2002)
74. J. Rasmussen, Risk management in a dynamic society: A modeling problem. Saf. Sci. 27,
183–213 (1997)
75. S. Dekker, E. Hollnagel, D. Woods, R. Cook, Resilience Engineering: New directions for
measuring and maintaining safety in complex systems. Final Report, November 2008. Lund
University School of Aviation (2008)
76. R. Westrum, Cultures with requisite imagination, in Verification and Validation of Complex
Systems: Human Factors Issues, NATO ASI Series, ed. by J.A. Wise, V.D. Hopkin, P Stager,
vol. 110 (Springer, Berlin, 1993), pp. 401–446
77. M.H. Schafer, T.P. Shippee, K.F. Ferraro, When does disadvantage not accumulate? Toward
a sociological conceptualization of resilience. Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Soziologie 35(2),
231–251 (2009)
78. S.E. Hobfoll, Stress, Culture, and Community: The Psychology and Philosophy of Stress
(Plenum, New York, 1998)
79. E.H. Powley, Reclaiming resilience and safety: Resilience activation in the critical period of
crisis. Human Rel. 62(9) (2009)
80. K.M. Suttcliffe, T.J. Vogus, Organizing for resilience, in Positive Organizational
Scholarship: Foundations of a New Discipline, ed. by K.S. Cameron, J.E. Dutton, R.E.
Quinn (Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco, CA, 2003), pp. 94–110
81. F. Guarnieri, S. Travadel, Engineering thinking in emergency situations: a new nuclear safety
concept. The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 70(6), 79 (2014)
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing,
adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate
credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and
indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter’s Creative
Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not
included in the chapter’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by
statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from
the copyright holder.
The Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Accident: Entering …
17