14. Nuclear Energy Agency, Methodologies for Assessing the Economic Consequences of
Nuclear Reactor Accidents (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development,
Paris, 2000)
15. German Renewable Energy Federation (BEE). Calculating a risk-appropriate insurance
premium to cover third-party liability risks that result from operation of nuclear power
plants. (Versicherunsforen, Leipzig, 2011)
16. IRSN. Méthodologie appliquée par l’IRSN pour l’estimation des coûts d’accidents nucléaires
en France. PRP-CRI/SESUC/2013-00261 (2013)
17. Rasmussen, N. WASH-1400 (Reactor Safety Study). An assessment of accident risks in US
Commercial Nuclear Power Plants, vol. 8 (1975)
18. U.S.N.R.C. CRAC-2 Report NUREG/CR-2239 (U.S.N.R.C. & Sandia National Lab,
Rockville, 1982
19. O. Hohmeyer, Latest Results of the International Discussion on the Social Costs of Energy—
How Does Wind Compare Today? (The European Commission’s Wind Energy Conference,
Madrid, 1990)
20. R.L. Ottinger et al., Environmental Costs of Electricity. Pace University Center for
Environmental Studies (Oceana Publications Inc, 1990)
21. H.-J. Ewers, K. Rennings, Abschätzung der Schäden durch einen sogennanten Super-GAU.
Prognos-Schriftenreihe Identifizierung und Internalisierung externer Kosten der
Energieversorgung (Prognos, Bâle, 1992)
22. CEPN. ExternE : Externalities of Energy—Volume 5 : nuclear (European Commission
Directorate-General XII, Luxembourg, 1995)
23. L. Eeckhoudt, C. Schieber, T. Schneider, Risk aversion and the external cost of a nuclear
accident. J. Environ. Manage. 58, 109–117 (2000)
24. A. Rabl, V.A. Rabl, External costs of nuclear: greater or less than the alternatives? Energy
Policy 57, 575–584 (2013)
25. R. Elvik, An analysis of official economic valuations of traffic accident fatalities in 20
motorized countries. Accid. Anal. Prev. 27(2), 237–247 (1995)
26. M.J. Cohen, Technological disasters and natural resource damage assessment: an evaluation
of the exxon valdez oil spill. Land Econ, 65–82 (1995)
27. R.T. Carson et al., Contingent valuation and lost passive use: damages from the exxon valdez
oil spill. Environ. Resource Econ. 25, 257–286 (2003)
28. Robert Mendelsohn et al., Country-specific market impacts of climate change. Clim. Change
45(3–4), 553–569 (2000)
29. Richard S.J. Tol, The economic effects of climate change. J. Econ. Perspect. 23(2), 29–51
(2009)
30. M. Shechter, Valuing the environment, in Principles of Environmental and Resource
Economics: A Guide for Students and Decision-Makers, H. Folmer, H.L. Gabel and Hans
Opschoor (Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., Aldershot, 1995)
31. Declan Butler, Reactors, residents and risk. Nature 474, 36 (2011)
32. AIEA. Chernobyl’s Legacy: Health Environmental and Socio-Economic Impacts and
Recommendations to the Governments of Belarus, the Russian Federation and Ukraine,
2nd edn. (The Chernobyl Forum, Vienna, 2003–2005, 2006)
33. I. Fairlie, D. Summer, The other report on Chernobyl. (MEP Greens/EFA, Berlin, 2006)
34. Masatsugu Hayashi, Larry Hughes, The Fukushima nuclear accident and its effect on global
energy security. Energy Policy 59, 102–111 (2013)
35. J.A. Jones, P.A. Mansfield, Irmgard Hasemann, PC COSYMA Version 2: An Accident
Consequence Assessment Package for use on a PC (European Commission, Brussels, 1996)
36. W. Adamowicz, J. Louviere, M. Williams, Combining revealed and stated preference
methods for valuing environmental amenities. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 26, 271–292 (1994)
37. W.M. Hanemann, Willingness to pay and willingness to accept: how much can they differ?
Am. Econ. Rev. 81(3), 635–647 (1991)
38. J.L. Knetsch, J.A. Sinden, Willingness to pay and compensation demanded: experimental
evidence of an unexpected disparity in measures of value. Q. J. Econ. 507–521 (1984)
The Economic Assessment of the Cost of Nuclear Accidents
95
Nuclear Reactor Accidents (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development,
Paris, 2000)
15. German Renewable Energy Federation (BEE). Calculating a risk-appropriate insurance
premium to cover third-party liability risks that result from operation of nuclear power
plants. (Versicherunsforen, Leipzig, 2011)
16. IRSN. Méthodologie appliquée par l’IRSN pour l’estimation des coûts d’accidents nucléaires
en France. PRP-CRI/SESUC/2013-00261 (2013)
17. Rasmussen, N. WASH-1400 (Reactor Safety Study). An assessment of accident risks in US
Commercial Nuclear Power Plants, vol. 8 (1975)
18. U.S.N.R.C. CRAC-2 Report NUREG/CR-2239 (U.S.N.R.C. & Sandia National Lab,
Rockville, 1982
19. O. Hohmeyer, Latest Results of the International Discussion on the Social Costs of Energy—
How Does Wind Compare Today? (The European Commission’s Wind Energy Conference,
Madrid, 1990)
20. R.L. Ottinger et al., Environmental Costs of Electricity. Pace University Center for
Environmental Studies (Oceana Publications Inc, 1990)
21. H.-J. Ewers, K. Rennings, Abschätzung der Schäden durch einen sogennanten Super-GAU.
Prognos-Schriftenreihe Identifizierung und Internalisierung externer Kosten der
Energieversorgung (Prognos, Bâle, 1992)
22. CEPN. ExternE : Externalities of Energy—Volume 5 : nuclear (European Commission
Directorate-General XII, Luxembourg, 1995)
23. L. Eeckhoudt, C. Schieber, T. Schneider, Risk aversion and the external cost of a nuclear
accident. J. Environ. Manage. 58, 109–117 (2000)
24. A. Rabl, V.A. Rabl, External costs of nuclear: greater or less than the alternatives? Energy
Policy 57, 575–584 (2013)
25. R. Elvik, An analysis of official economic valuations of traffic accident fatalities in 20
motorized countries. Accid. Anal. Prev. 27(2), 237–247 (1995)
26. M.J. Cohen, Technological disasters and natural resource damage assessment: an evaluation
of the exxon valdez oil spill. Land Econ, 65–82 (1995)
27. R.T. Carson et al., Contingent valuation and lost passive use: damages from the exxon valdez
oil spill. Environ. Resource Econ. 25, 257–286 (2003)
28. Robert Mendelsohn et al., Country-specific market impacts of climate change. Clim. Change
45(3–4), 553–569 (2000)
29. Richard S.J. Tol, The economic effects of climate change. J. Econ. Perspect. 23(2), 29–51
(2009)
30. M. Shechter, Valuing the environment, in Principles of Environmental and Resource
Economics: A Guide for Students and Decision-Makers, H. Folmer, H.L. Gabel and Hans
Opschoor (Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., Aldershot, 1995)
31. Declan Butler, Reactors, residents and risk. Nature 474, 36 (2011)
32. AIEA. Chernobyl’s Legacy: Health Environmental and Socio-Economic Impacts and
Recommendations to the Governments of Belarus, the Russian Federation and Ukraine,
2nd edn. (The Chernobyl Forum, Vienna, 2003–2005, 2006)
33. I. Fairlie, D. Summer, The other report on Chernobyl. (MEP Greens/EFA, Berlin, 2006)
34. Masatsugu Hayashi, Larry Hughes, The Fukushima nuclear accident and its effect on global
energy security. Energy Policy 59, 102–111 (2013)
35. J.A. Jones, P.A. Mansfield, Irmgard Hasemann, PC COSYMA Version 2: An Accident
Consequence Assessment Package for use on a PC (European Commission, Brussels, 1996)
36. W. Adamowicz, J. Louviere, M. Williams, Combining revealed and stated preference
methods for valuing environmental amenities. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 26, 271–292 (1994)
37. W.M. Hanemann, Willingness to pay and willingness to accept: how much can they differ?
Am. Econ. Rev. 81(3), 635–647 (1991)
38. J.L. Knetsch, J.A. Sinden, Willingness to pay and compensation demanded: experimental
evidence of an unexpected disparity in measures of value. Q. J. Econ. 507–521 (1984)
The Economic Assessment of the Cost of Nuclear Accidents
95