235
Fig. 10.2 Conceptual model of aspects to consider measuring and their relationships in order to assess the effects of biodiversity on spiritual well-being
(developed from Irvine et al. 2013; Fisher, J. 2011; Hartig et al. 2014; Heintzman 2009, 2016; Marselle et al. 2016; Shanahan et al. 2016; Yeh et al. 2016). The
model includes the exposure of interest (nature), potential moderators of effects (personal characteristics, activity and group processes), possible mediators
(mental, emotional, spiritual, place and social) and the outcome of interest, spiritual well-being (see also Table 10.1). (Illustration by SL Warber and KN Irvine)
10 Biodiversity and Spiritual Well-being
Fig. 10.2 Conceptual model of aspects to consider measuring and their relationships in order to assess the effects of biodiversity on spiritual well-being
(developed from Irvine et al. 2013; Fisher, J. 2011; Hartig et al. 2014; Heintzman 2009, 2016; Marselle et al. 2016; Shanahan et al. 2016; Yeh et al. 2016). The
model includes the exposure of interest (nature), potential moderators of effects (personal characteristics, activity and group processes), possible mediators
(mental, emotional, spiritual, place and social) and the outcome of interest, spiritual well-being (see also Table 10.1). (Illustration by SL Warber and KN Irvine)
10 Biodiversity and Spiritual Well-being