Nanoceramics: Synthesis, Characterizations and Applications
155
90. Kumar AM, Adesina AY, Hussein MA (2019) PEDOT/FHA nanocomposite coatings on newly
developed Ti-Nb-Zr implants: biocompatibility and surface protection against corrosion and
bacterial infections. Mater Sci Eng, C 98:482–495
91. Goncalves SEP, Bresciani E (2017) Reconstructions using alloys and ceramics. In: Materialtissue interfacial phenomena. Elsevier Publications, London.
92. Wu H, Xie L, He M et al (2019) A wear-resistant TiO 2 nanoceramic coating on titanium
implants for visible-light photocatalytic removal of organic residues. Acta Biomater 97:597–
607
93. Pekkan G, Pekkan K, Park J et al (2016) A study on microstructural characterization of the
interface between apatite-wollastonite based glass ceramic and feldspathic dental porcelain.
Ceram Inter 42(16):19245–19249
94. Donovan TE (2008) Factors essential for successful all-ceramic restorations. J Am Dent Assoc
139:14S–18S
95. Koutayas SO, Vagkopoulou T, Pelekanos S et al (2009) Zirconia in dentistry: part 2. Evidencebased clinical breakthrough. Eur J Esthet Dent 4(4):348–380
96. Regi MV, Balas F, Arcos D (2007) Mesoporous materials for drug delivery. Angew Chem Int
Ed 46:7548–7558
97. Regi MV, Balas F, Colilla M et al (2008) Bone-regenrative bioceramic implants with drug
and protein controlled delivery capability. Solid State Sci 1:163–191
98. Datt A, Burns EA, Dhuna NA et al (2013) Loading and release of 5-fluorouracil from HY
zeolites with varying SiO2/Al2O3 ratios. Micropor Mesopor Mater 167:182–187
99. Ozdemir V, Glatt BWJSJ, Tsuang MT et al (2006) Shifting emphasis from pharmacogenomics
to theragnostics. Nat Biotechnol 24:942–946
100. Yi H, Rehman FU, Zhao C (2016) Recent advances in nano scaffolds for bone repair. Bone
Res 4:1–11
101. Ansari AA, Hasan TN, Syed et al (2013) In-vitro cyto-toxicity, geno-toxicity, and bio-imaging
evaluation of one-pot synthesized luminescent functionalized mesoporous SiO 2 @Eu(OH) 3
core-shell microspheres. Nanomedicine 9:1328–1335
102. Yang W, Tian H, Liao J (2020) Flexible and strong Fe 3 O 4 /cellulose composite film as magnetic
and UV sensor. Appl Surf Sci 507:145092
103. Shi Z, Huang X, Cai Y et al (2009) Size effect of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles on proliferation
and apoptosis of osteoblast-like cells. Acta Biomater 5:338–345
104. Khan Y, Yaszemski MJ, Mikos AG et al (2008) Tissue engineering of bone: material and
matrix considerations. J Bone Jt Surg 90:36–42
105. Dziak R, Mohan K, Almaghrabi B et al (2020) Nanoceramics for bone regeneration in the
oral and craniomaxillofacial complex. In: Nanobiomaterials in clinical dentistry. Elsevier
Publications, London
106. Deepthi S, Venkatesan J, Kim SK et al (2016) An overview of chitin or chitosan/nano ceramic
composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Inter J Biol Macromol 93:1338–1353
107. Luo Z, Deng Y, Zhang R et al (2015) Peptide-laden mesoporous silica nanoparticles with
promoted bioactivity and osteo-differentiation ability for bone tissue engineering. Colloids
Surf B 131:73–82
108. Xia L, Lin K, Jiang X et al (2014) Effect of nano-structured bioceramic surface on osteogenic
differentiation of adipose derived stem cells. Biomater 35:8514–8527
109. Chen P, Liu L, Pan J et al (2019) Biomimetic composite scaffold of hydroxyapatite/gelatinchitosan core-shell nanofibers for bone tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C: Mater Biol Appl
97:325–335
110. Marsh AC, Mellott NP, Chamorro NP et al (2019) Fabrication and multiscale characterization
of 3D silver containing bioactive glass-ceramic scaffolds. Bioact Mater 4:215–223
111. Kumar SD, Abudhahir KM, Selvamurugan N et al (2018) Formulation and biological
actions of nano-bioglass ceramic particles doped with Calcarea phosphorica for bone tissue
engineering. Mater Sci Eng C: Mater Biol Appl 83:202–209
112. Shokrollahi H, Salimi F, Doostmohammadi A (2017) The fabrication and characterization
of barium titanate/akermanite nano-bio-ceramic with a suitable piezoelectric coefficient for
bone defect recovery. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 74:365–370
155
90. Kumar AM, Adesina AY, Hussein MA (2019) PEDOT/FHA nanocomposite coatings on newly
developed Ti-Nb-Zr implants: biocompatibility and surface protection against corrosion and
bacterial infections. Mater Sci Eng, C 98:482–495
91. Goncalves SEP, Bresciani E (2017) Reconstructions using alloys and ceramics. In: Materialtissue interfacial phenomena. Elsevier Publications, London.
92. Wu H, Xie L, He M et al (2019) A wear-resistant TiO 2 nanoceramic coating on titanium
implants for visible-light photocatalytic removal of organic residues. Acta Biomater 97:597–
607
93. Pekkan G, Pekkan K, Park J et al (2016) A study on microstructural characterization of the
interface between apatite-wollastonite based glass ceramic and feldspathic dental porcelain.
Ceram Inter 42(16):19245–19249
94. Donovan TE (2008) Factors essential for successful all-ceramic restorations. J Am Dent Assoc
139:14S–18S
95. Koutayas SO, Vagkopoulou T, Pelekanos S et al (2009) Zirconia in dentistry: part 2. Evidencebased clinical breakthrough. Eur J Esthet Dent 4(4):348–380
96. Regi MV, Balas F, Arcos D (2007) Mesoporous materials for drug delivery. Angew Chem Int
Ed 46:7548–7558
97. Regi MV, Balas F, Colilla M et al (2008) Bone-regenrative bioceramic implants with drug
and protein controlled delivery capability. Solid State Sci 1:163–191
98. Datt A, Burns EA, Dhuna NA et al (2013) Loading and release of 5-fluorouracil from HY
zeolites with varying SiO2/Al2O3 ratios. Micropor Mesopor Mater 167:182–187
99. Ozdemir V, Glatt BWJSJ, Tsuang MT et al (2006) Shifting emphasis from pharmacogenomics
to theragnostics. Nat Biotechnol 24:942–946
100. Yi H, Rehman FU, Zhao C (2016) Recent advances in nano scaffolds for bone repair. Bone
Res 4:1–11
101. Ansari AA, Hasan TN, Syed et al (2013) In-vitro cyto-toxicity, geno-toxicity, and bio-imaging
evaluation of one-pot synthesized luminescent functionalized mesoporous SiO 2 @Eu(OH) 3
core-shell microspheres. Nanomedicine 9:1328–1335
102. Yang W, Tian H, Liao J (2020) Flexible and strong Fe 3 O 4 /cellulose composite film as magnetic
and UV sensor. Appl Surf Sci 507:145092
103. Shi Z, Huang X, Cai Y et al (2009) Size effect of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles on proliferation
and apoptosis of osteoblast-like cells. Acta Biomater 5:338–345
104. Khan Y, Yaszemski MJ, Mikos AG et al (2008) Tissue engineering of bone: material and
matrix considerations. J Bone Jt Surg 90:36–42
105. Dziak R, Mohan K, Almaghrabi B et al (2020) Nanoceramics for bone regeneration in the
oral and craniomaxillofacial complex. In: Nanobiomaterials in clinical dentistry. Elsevier
Publications, London
106. Deepthi S, Venkatesan J, Kim SK et al (2016) An overview of chitin or chitosan/nano ceramic
composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Inter J Biol Macromol 93:1338–1353
107. Luo Z, Deng Y, Zhang R et al (2015) Peptide-laden mesoporous silica nanoparticles with
promoted bioactivity and osteo-differentiation ability for bone tissue engineering. Colloids
Surf B 131:73–82
108. Xia L, Lin K, Jiang X et al (2014) Effect of nano-structured bioceramic surface on osteogenic
differentiation of adipose derived stem cells. Biomater 35:8514–8527
109. Chen P, Liu L, Pan J et al (2019) Biomimetic composite scaffold of hydroxyapatite/gelatinchitosan core-shell nanofibers for bone tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C: Mater Biol Appl
97:325–335
110. Marsh AC, Mellott NP, Chamorro NP et al (2019) Fabrication and multiscale characterization
of 3D silver containing bioactive glass-ceramic scaffolds. Bioact Mater 4:215–223
111. Kumar SD, Abudhahir KM, Selvamurugan N et al (2018) Formulation and biological
actions of nano-bioglass ceramic particles doped with Calcarea phosphorica for bone tissue
engineering. Mater Sci Eng C: Mater Biol Appl 83:202–209
112. Shokrollahi H, Salimi F, Doostmohammadi A (2017) The fabrication and characterization
of barium titanate/akermanite nano-bio-ceramic with a suitable piezoelectric coefficient for
bone defect recovery. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 74:365–370