Syri S, Karvosenoja N, Lehtilä A, Laurila T, Lindfors V, Tuovinen J-P (2002) Modeling the
impacts of the Finnish Climate Strategy on air pollution. Atmos Environ 36:3059–3069
Tainio M (2009) Methods and uncertainties in the assessment of the health effects of fine
particulate matter (PM2.5) air pollution. National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL) and
Faculty of Natural and Environmental Science at Kuopio University
Thunis P, Rouil L, Cuvelier C, Stern R, Kerschbaumer A, Bessagnet B, Schaap M, Builtjes P,
Tarrason L, Douros J, Moussiopoulos N, Pirovano G, Bedogni M (2007) Analysis of model
responses to emission-reduction scenarios within the CityDelta project. Atmos Environ
41:208–220
UNECE (2002) Progress report prepared by the Chairman of the task force on integrated
assessment modelling, United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, Geneva,
Switzerland
Uusitalo L, Lehikoinen A, Helle I, Myrberg K (2015) An overview of methods to evaluate
uncertainty of deterministic model in decision support. Environ Model Softw 63:24–31
Van Jaarsveld JA (2004) The operational priority substances model. Report nr 500045001/2004,
RIVM, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
Vlachokostas Ch, Achillas Ch, Moussiopoulos N, Hourdakis E, Tsilingiridis G, Ntziachristos L,
Banias G, Stavrakakis N, Sidiropoulos C (2009) Decision support system for the evaluation of
urban air pollution control options: application for particulate pollution in Thessaloniki,
Greece. Sci Total Environ 407:5937–5938
Zachary DS, Drouet L, Leopold U, Aleluia Reis L (2011) Trade-offs between energy cost and
health impact in a regional coupled energy–air quality model: the LEAQ model. Environ Res
Lett 6:1–9
Open Access This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give
appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons
license and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the work’s Creative
Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if such material is not included in
the work’s Creative Commons license and the respective action is not permitted by statutory
regulation, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to duplicate, adapt or
reproduce the material.
4 Strengths and Weaknesses of the Current EU Situation
83
impacts of the Finnish Climate Strategy on air pollution. Atmos Environ 36:3059–3069
Tainio M (2009) Methods and uncertainties in the assessment of the health effects of fine
particulate matter (PM2.5) air pollution. National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL) and
Faculty of Natural and Environmental Science at Kuopio University
Thunis P, Rouil L, Cuvelier C, Stern R, Kerschbaumer A, Bessagnet B, Schaap M, Builtjes P,
Tarrason L, Douros J, Moussiopoulos N, Pirovano G, Bedogni M (2007) Analysis of model
responses to emission-reduction scenarios within the CityDelta project. Atmos Environ
41:208–220
UNECE (2002) Progress report prepared by the Chairman of the task force on integrated
assessment modelling, United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, Geneva,
Switzerland
Uusitalo L, Lehikoinen A, Helle I, Myrberg K (2015) An overview of methods to evaluate
uncertainty of deterministic model in decision support. Environ Model Softw 63:24–31
Van Jaarsveld JA (2004) The operational priority substances model. Report nr 500045001/2004,
RIVM, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
Vlachokostas Ch, Achillas Ch, Moussiopoulos N, Hourdakis E, Tsilingiridis G, Ntziachristos L,
Banias G, Stavrakakis N, Sidiropoulos C (2009) Decision support system for the evaluation of
urban air pollution control options: application for particulate pollution in Thessaloniki,
Greece. Sci Total Environ 407:5937–5938
Zachary DS, Drouet L, Leopold U, Aleluia Reis L (2011) Trade-offs between energy cost and
health impact in a regional coupled energy–air quality model: the LEAQ model. Environ Res
Lett 6:1–9
Open Access This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give
appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons
license and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the work’s Creative
Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if such material is not included in
the work’s Creative Commons license and the respective action is not permitted by statutory
regulation, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to duplicate, adapt or
reproduce the material.
4 Strengths and Weaknesses of the Current EU Situation
83