References
1. Griggs D, et al., Policy: Sustainable development goals for people and planet, Nature, 2013,
495(7441): pp. 305–307.
2. Zoeteman B.C, Krikke H.R, Venselaar J, Handling WEEE waste flows: on the effectiveness of
producer responsibility in a globalizing world, The International Journal of Advanced
Manufacturing Technology, 2010, 47(5): pp. 415–436.
3. Johnson M, Wang M, Sustainability and management of end-of-life vehicles (ELVs) within
the European Union’s Directive on ELVs, 2001, SAE Technical Paper.
4. Naturvårdsverket, Steering towards the environmental objectives: The Swedish
Environmental Protection Agency’s in-depth evaluation of the environmental objectives
2015, T.S.E.P. Agency, Editor, 2017.
5. Martín-Peña M.L, Díaz-Garrido E, Sánchez-López J.M, Analysis of benefits and difficulties
associated with firms’ Environmental Management Systems: the case of the Spanish
automotive industry, Journal of Cleaner Production, 2014, 70: pp. 220–230.
6. Yin H, Schmeidler P.J, Why do standardized ISO 14001 environmental management systems
lead to heterogeneous environmental outcomes? Business Strategy and the Environment,
2009, 18(7): pp. 469–486.
7. Fitzgerald D.P, et al., Design for environment (DfE): strategies, practices, guidelines,
methods, and tools, 2007, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ. p. 1–24.
8. Lindahl M, Ekermann S, Structure for categorization of ecodesign methods and tools,
Re-engineering manufacturing for sustainability, 2013, Springer, pp. 117–122.
9. Schöggl J.P, Baumgartner R.J, Hofer D, Improving sustainability performance in early phases
of product design: A checklist for sustainable product development tested in the automotive
industry, Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 140: pp. 1602–1617.
10. Pigosso D.C.A, McAloone T, Rozenfeld H, Characterization of the state-of-the-art and
identification of main trends for Ecodesign Tools and Methods: Classifying three decades
of research and implementation, Journal of the Indian Institute of Science, 2016, 95(4):
pp. 405–428.
11. Rousseaux P, et al., “Eco-tool-seeker”: A new and unique business guide for choosing
ecodesign tools, Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 151: pp. 546–577.
12. Poulikidou S, Björklund A, Tyskeng S, Empirical study on integration of environmental
aspects into product development: processes, requirements and the use of tools in vehicle
manufacturing companies in Sweden, Journal of Cleaner Production, 2014. 81: pp. 34–45.
13. Bovea M, Pérez-Belis V, A taxonomy of ecodesign tools for integrating environmental
requirements into the product design process, Journal of Cleaner Production, 2012, 20(1):
pp. 61–71.
14. Knight P, Jenkins J.O, Adopting and applying eco-design techniques: a practitioners
perspective, Journal of Cleaner Production, 2009, 17(5): pp. 549–558.
15. Lindahl M, Tingström J, En liten lärobok om miljöeffektanalys, 2000: Institutionen för teknik,
Högskolan i Kalmar.
16. Hallstedt S, et al., An approach to assessing sustainability integration in strategic decision
systems for product development, Journal of Cleaner Production, 2010, 18(8): pp. 703–712.
17. Schöggl J, Baumgartner R.J, Hofer D, A Checklist for sustainable product development:
Improving sustainability performance in early phases of product design, 2014.
18. Louis S, Wendel A, Life cycle assessment and design-experience from Volvo Car
Corporation, 1998, SAE Technical Paper.
19. Nordkil T, Volvos vita lista, Volvo Corporate Standard, 1998.
21. Nordkil T, Volvos vita lista, Volvo Corporate Standard, 1998.
388
S. A. Brambila-Macias et al.
1. Griggs D, et al., Policy: Sustainable development goals for people and planet, Nature, 2013,
495(7441): pp. 305–307.
2. Zoeteman B.C, Krikke H.R, Venselaar J, Handling WEEE waste flows: on the effectiveness of
producer responsibility in a globalizing world, The International Journal of Advanced
Manufacturing Technology, 2010, 47(5): pp. 415–436.
3. Johnson M, Wang M, Sustainability and management of end-of-life vehicles (ELVs) within
the European Union’s Directive on ELVs, 2001, SAE Technical Paper.
4. Naturvårdsverket, Steering towards the environmental objectives: The Swedish
Environmental Protection Agency’s in-depth evaluation of the environmental objectives
2015, T.S.E.P. Agency, Editor, 2017.
5. Martín-Peña M.L, Díaz-Garrido E, Sánchez-López J.M, Analysis of benefits and difficulties
associated with firms’ Environmental Management Systems: the case of the Spanish
automotive industry, Journal of Cleaner Production, 2014, 70: pp. 220–230.
6. Yin H, Schmeidler P.J, Why do standardized ISO 14001 environmental management systems
lead to heterogeneous environmental outcomes? Business Strategy and the Environment,
2009, 18(7): pp. 469–486.
7. Fitzgerald D.P, et al., Design for environment (DfE): strategies, practices, guidelines,
methods, and tools, 2007, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ. p. 1–24.
8. Lindahl M, Ekermann S, Structure for categorization of ecodesign methods and tools,
Re-engineering manufacturing for sustainability, 2013, Springer, pp. 117–122.
9. Schöggl J.P, Baumgartner R.J, Hofer D, Improving sustainability performance in early phases
of product design: A checklist for sustainable product development tested in the automotive
industry, Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 140: pp. 1602–1617.
10. Pigosso D.C.A, McAloone T, Rozenfeld H, Characterization of the state-of-the-art and
identification of main trends for Ecodesign Tools and Methods: Classifying three decades
of research and implementation, Journal of the Indian Institute of Science, 2016, 95(4):
pp. 405–428.
11. Rousseaux P, et al., “Eco-tool-seeker”: A new and unique business guide for choosing
ecodesign tools, Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 151: pp. 546–577.
12. Poulikidou S, Björklund A, Tyskeng S, Empirical study on integration of environmental
aspects into product development: processes, requirements and the use of tools in vehicle
manufacturing companies in Sweden, Journal of Cleaner Production, 2014. 81: pp. 34–45.
13. Bovea M, Pérez-Belis V, A taxonomy of ecodesign tools for integrating environmental
requirements into the product design process, Journal of Cleaner Production, 2012, 20(1):
pp. 61–71.
14. Knight P, Jenkins J.O, Adopting and applying eco-design techniques: a practitioners
perspective, Journal of Cleaner Production, 2009, 17(5): pp. 549–558.
15. Lindahl M, Tingström J, En liten lärobok om miljöeffektanalys, 2000: Institutionen för teknik,
Högskolan i Kalmar.
16. Hallstedt S, et al., An approach to assessing sustainability integration in strategic decision
systems for product development, Journal of Cleaner Production, 2010, 18(8): pp. 703–712.
17. Schöggl J, Baumgartner R.J, Hofer D, A Checklist for sustainable product development:
Improving sustainability performance in early phases of product design, 2014.
18. Louis S, Wendel A, Life cycle assessment and design-experience from Volvo Car
Corporation, 1998, SAE Technical Paper.
19. Nordkil T, Volvos vita lista, Volvo Corporate Standard, 1998.
21. Nordkil T, Volvos vita lista, Volvo Corporate Standard, 1998.
388
S. A. Brambila-Macias et al.