3. EUROSTAT, Statistics on Waste in Europe, Stat. Explain. (2015).
4. Miehe R, Schneider R, Baaij F, Bauernhansl T, Criticality of Material Resources in Industrial
Enterprises—Structural Basics of an Operational Model, 23rd CIRP Conf. Life Cycle Eng.
48 (2016) 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.03.035.
5. Hametner M, Dimitrova A, Schindler P, Sustainable development in the European Union—
2016 Edition, EUROSTAT, Brussels, 2016, doi:10.1002/ (SICI)1099-0976 (199711)
7:6 <181::AID-EET134> 3.0.CO; 2-S.
6. Schandl H, Decoupling global environmental pressure and economic growth: scenarios for
energy use, materials use and carbon emissions, J. Clean. Prod. (2015) 1–12. https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.100.
7. McDonough W, Braungart M, Cradle to cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things, Edition
al, Manifesto, Paris, 2012.
8. Rebitzer G, Fullana P, Weidema B.P, Jolliet O, Recycling, Close-Loop Economy, Secondary
Resources, in: 10th LCA Case Study Symp., 2003: pp. 106–108.
9. Butterworth J, Morlet A, Nguyen H.P, Oppenheim J, Stuchtey M, Towards the Circular
Economy: Economic and Business Rationale for an Accelerated Transition, Ellen MacArthur
Foundation, Vol. 1, 2013 98. https://doi.org/10.1162/108819806775545321.
10. Gahleitner A, Closing the loop: Next steps critical for Europe’s Circular Economy, Eur.
Alum. Assoc. 2, 2015, 2.
11. Lavery G, Pennell N, Le Nouveau Modèle Industriel : Plus de bénéfices, plus d’emplois et
moins d’impact sur l’environnement, Interface, 2014.
12. Grimaud G, Perry N, Laratte B, Life Cycle Assessment of Aluminium Recycling Process:
Case of Shredder Cables, in: Procedia CIRP, Berlin, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.
2016.03.097.
13. Grimaud G, Perry N, Laratte B, Reducing Environmental Impacts of Aluminium Recycling
Process Using Life Cycle Assessment, 12th Bienn. Int. Conf. EcoBalance. October, 2016, 7.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.03.097.
14. Grimaud G, Laratte B, Perry N, To Transport Waste or Transport Recycling Plant: Insights
from Life-Cycle Analysis, in: Soc. Mater. Int. Conf. (SAM 11), SOVAMAT, Trondheim,
2017: pp. 1–18.
15. UNEP, Recycling Rates of Metals, Paris, 2011.
16. Fisher A, Functional versus Innovative Products, 2012, 8.
17. Heiskanen K, Theory and Tools of Physical Separation/Recycling, in: Handb. Recycl.,
Elsevier Inc., Amsterdam, 2014: pp. 39–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-396459-5.
00005-2.
18. European Commission, General Verification Protocol for EU Environmental Technology
Verification programme—Version 1.1, 2014, 74.
19. European Commission, EU Environmental Technology Verification, Environ. Technol. Verif.
Progr., 2016, 15.
20. European Commission, A Comprehensive Guide for Proposers to the EU Environmental
Technologies Verification Pilot Programme, Project Ad, European Commission,
Luxembourg, 2012.
21. Grimaud G, Perry N, Laratte B, Decision Support Methodology for Designing Sustainable
Recycling Process Based on ETV Standards, Int. Conf. Sustain. Mater. Process. Manuf.
SMPM 2017. 7, 2017, 72–78. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2016.12.020.
22. International Standard Organization, ISO 22628:2002—Road vehicles—Recyclability and
recoverability—Calculation method, 2002. (accessed May 31, 2017).
23. Office of Acquisition and Project Management, LIFE CYCLE COST HANDBOOK Guidance
for Life Cycle Cost Estimation and Analysis, 2014, 89. http://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/
2014/10/f18/LCC Handbook Final Version 9-30-14. pdf.
18
G. Grimaud et al.
4. Miehe R, Schneider R, Baaij F, Bauernhansl T, Criticality of Material Resources in Industrial
Enterprises—Structural Basics of an Operational Model, 23rd CIRP Conf. Life Cycle Eng.
48 (2016) 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.03.035.
5. Hametner M, Dimitrova A, Schindler P, Sustainable development in the European Union—
2016 Edition, EUROSTAT, Brussels, 2016, doi:10.1002/ (SICI)1099-0976 (199711)
7:6 <181::AID-EET134> 3.0.CO; 2-S.
6. Schandl H, Decoupling global environmental pressure and economic growth: scenarios for
energy use, materials use and carbon emissions, J. Clean. Prod. (2015) 1–12. https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.100.
7. McDonough W, Braungart M, Cradle to cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things, Edition
al, Manifesto, Paris, 2012.
8. Rebitzer G, Fullana P, Weidema B.P, Jolliet O, Recycling, Close-Loop Economy, Secondary
Resources, in: 10th LCA Case Study Symp., 2003: pp. 106–108.
9. Butterworth J, Morlet A, Nguyen H.P, Oppenheim J, Stuchtey M, Towards the Circular
Economy: Economic and Business Rationale for an Accelerated Transition, Ellen MacArthur
Foundation, Vol. 1, 2013 98. https://doi.org/10.1162/108819806775545321.
10. Gahleitner A, Closing the loop: Next steps critical for Europe’s Circular Economy, Eur.
Alum. Assoc. 2, 2015, 2.
11. Lavery G, Pennell N, Le Nouveau Modèle Industriel : Plus de bénéfices, plus d’emplois et
moins d’impact sur l’environnement, Interface, 2014.
12. Grimaud G, Perry N, Laratte B, Life Cycle Assessment of Aluminium Recycling Process:
Case of Shredder Cables, in: Procedia CIRP, Berlin, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.
2016.03.097.
13. Grimaud G, Perry N, Laratte B, Reducing Environmental Impacts of Aluminium Recycling
Process Using Life Cycle Assessment, 12th Bienn. Int. Conf. EcoBalance. October, 2016, 7.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.03.097.
14. Grimaud G, Laratte B, Perry N, To Transport Waste or Transport Recycling Plant: Insights
from Life-Cycle Analysis, in: Soc. Mater. Int. Conf. (SAM 11), SOVAMAT, Trondheim,
2017: pp. 1–18.
15. UNEP, Recycling Rates of Metals, Paris, 2011.
16. Fisher A, Functional versus Innovative Products, 2012, 8.
17. Heiskanen K, Theory and Tools of Physical Separation/Recycling, in: Handb. Recycl.,
Elsevier Inc., Amsterdam, 2014: pp. 39–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-396459-5.
00005-2.
18. European Commission, General Verification Protocol for EU Environmental Technology
Verification programme—Version 1.1, 2014, 74.
19. European Commission, EU Environmental Technology Verification, Environ. Technol. Verif.
Progr., 2016, 15.
20. European Commission, A Comprehensive Guide for Proposers to the EU Environmental
Technologies Verification Pilot Programme, Project Ad, European Commission,
Luxembourg, 2012.
21. Grimaud G, Perry N, Laratte B, Decision Support Methodology for Designing Sustainable
Recycling Process Based on ETV Standards, Int. Conf. Sustain. Mater. Process. Manuf.
SMPM 2017. 7, 2017, 72–78. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2016.12.020.
22. International Standard Organization, ISO 22628:2002—Road vehicles—Recyclability and
recoverability—Calculation method, 2002.
23. Office of Acquisition and Project Management, LIFE CYCLE COST HANDBOOK Guidance
for Life Cycle Cost Estimation and Analysis, 2014, 89. http://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/
2014/10/f18/LCC Handbook Final Version 9-30-14. pdf.
18
G. Grimaud et al.