70
Hawkins AD (2007) Review of science and stakeholder involvement in the production of advice
on fi sheries management. Work Package 4 paper of the EU project “Scientifi c Advice for
Fisheries Management at Multiple Scales” (SAFMAMS). Available from: http://www.ifm.dk/
safmams/Downloads/WP3/D2%20Review%20of%20Science%20and%20Stakeholder%20
Involvement.pdf
Hegland TJ (2009) The Common Fisheries Policy and competing perspectives on integration,
Publication Series Department of Development and Planning. Aalborg University, Aalborg
Hegland TJ (2012) Fishing for change in EU governance: excursions into the evolution of the
Common Fisheries Policy . PhD thesis, Aalborg University, Aalborg
Hegland TJ, Ounanian K, Raakjer J (2012) Why and how to regionalise the Common Fisheries
Policy. Marit Stud 11(7)
Hegland TJ, Raakjaer J, van Tatenhove J (2015) Implementing ecosystem-based marine management as a process of regionalisation: some lessons from the Baltic Sea. Ocean Coast Manag (In
press)
Howarth W (2008) The interpretation of ‘precaution’ in the European Community Common
Fisheries Policy. J Environ Law 20:213–244
ICES WGMARS Report (2013) Interim report of the Working Group on Maritim Systems
(WGMARS), 4–8 Nov 2013, Stockholm, Sweden. ICES CM 2013/SSGSUE:06.30pp
Johannesen O, Lassen H (2014) Decision-making management procedures. Cost – effi ciency –
democracy in selected procedures in maritime spatial planning. TemaNord 2014:532
Lassen H (2009) Scientifi c advice for Fisheries Management. In Fisheries, sustainability and
development. Royal Swedish Academy of Agriculture and Forestry, Stockholm
Lassen H, Kelly C, Sissenwine M (2014) ICES advisory framework 1977–2012: from Fmax to
precautionary approach and beyond. ICES J Mar Sci 71:166–172
Linke S, Bruckmeier K (2015) Co-management in fi sheries – experiences and changing approaches
in Europe. Ocean Coast Manag 104:170–181
Linke S, Jentoft S (2013) A communicative turnaround: shifting the burden of proof in European
fi sheries governance. Mar Policy 38:337–345
Linke S, Jentoft S (2014) Exploring the phronetic dimension of stakeholders’ knowledge in EU
fi sheries governance. Mar Policy 47:153–161
Linke S, Dreyer M, Sellke P (2011) The regional advisory councils. What is their potential to
incorporate stakeholder knowledge into fi sheries governance? AMBIO 40(2):133–144
Linke S, Gilek M, Karlsson M, Udovyk O (2014) Unravelling science-policy interactions in environmental risk governance of the Baltic Sea: comparing fi sheries and eutrophication. J Risk
Res 17(4):505–523
Long R (2010) The role of Regional Advisory Councils in the European Common Fisheries Policy:
legal constraints and future options. Int J Mar Coast Law 25:289–346
Mc Goodwin JR (1990) Crisis in the world’s fi sheries: people, problems, and policies. Stanford
California University Press, Stanford
McLeod KL, Leslie H (eds) (2009) Ecosystem-based management for the oceans. Island Press,
Washington, DC
Meyer U, Schulz-Schaeffer I (2006) Three forms of interpretative fl exibility. In: Science, technology & innovation studies, Special Issue 1
Möllmann C, Lindegren M, Bleckner T, Bergström L, Casini M, Diekmann R, Flinkman J, MüllerKarulis B, Neuenfeldt S, Schmidt JO, Tomczak M, Voss R, Gårdmark A (2014) Implementing
ecosystem-based fi sheries management: from single-species to integrated ecosystem assessment and advice for Baltic Sea fi sh stocks. ICES J Mar Sci 71(5):1187–1197. doi: 10.1093/
icesjms/fst123
Nielsen KN, Holm P, Aschan M (2015) Results based management in fi sheries: delegating responsibility to resource users. Mar Policy 51:442–451
Österblom H, Hansson S, Larsson U, Hjerne O, Wulff F, Elmgren R, Folke C (2007) Humaninduced trophic cascades and ecological regime shifts in the Baltic Sea. Ecosystems
10:877–889
P. Sellke et al.
Précédent

- 88/265

Suivant