225
References
Aarhus Convention on Access to Information (1998) Public participation in decision-making and
access to justice in environmental matters
Anderson A (1997) Media culture and the environment. Routledge, London
Asp K (1986) Mäktiga massmedier. Studier i politisk opinionsbildning (in Swedish).
Akademilitteratur, Stockholm
Baltic 21 (2002) Agenda 21 for the Baltic Sea region sector report – education. Baltic 21. Series
No 02/2002
Beck U (1992) Risk society. Sage, London
Boström M, Grönholm S, Hassler B (2016) The ecosystem approach to management in Baltic Sea
governance: towards increased refl exivity? In: Gilek M et al (eds) Environmental governance
of the Baltic Sea. Springer, Dordrecht
Brake ML, Weitkamp E (2009) Introducing science communication. A practical guide. New York:
Palgrave Macmillan
Breakwell GM (2007) The psychology of risk. Cambridge University Press, New York
Bucchi M (2004) Can genetics help us rethink communication? Public communication of science
as a ‘double helix’. New Gen Soc 23(3):269–283
Bäckstrand K (2003) Civic science for sustainability: reframing the role of experts, policy-makers
and citizens in environmental governance. Glob Environ Polit 2003(3):24–41.
doi: 10.1162/152638003322757916
Castells M (2008) The new public sphere: global civil society, communication networks and global
governance. Ann Am Acad Polit Econ Sci 616(1):78–93
Cox R (2010) Environmental communication and the public sphere, 2nd edn. Sage, London
Dahlgren P (2005) The internet, public spheres, and political communication: dispersion and
deliberation. Polit Commun 22(2):147–162
De Marchi B (2003) Public participation and risk governance. Sci Public Policy 30(3):171–176
Dreyer M, Sellke P, Boström M, Jönsson AM, Hammer M, Renn O, Söderström S, Zgrundo A
(2011) Structures and processes of public and stakeholder communication connected to environmental risks in the Baltic Sea. Deliverable 10 within the RISKGOV project. Available
from: http://www.sh.se/riskgov
Dreyer M, Boström M, Jönsson AM (2014) Participatory deliberation, risk governance and management of the marine region in the European Union. J Environ Pol Plan. doi: 10.1080/15239
08X.2013.866891
European Commission (2001a) Sixth environment action plan 2001–2010. European Commission,
Brussels
European Commission (2001b) European governance. A white paper. COM (2001) 428 fi nal.
CEC, Brussels
Entman RM (1993) Framing: toward clarifi cation of a fractured paradigm. J Commun 43(4):51–
58. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
Egan Sjölander A, Jönsson AM (2012) Contested ethanol dreams – public participation in environmental news. In: Philips L, Carvalho A, Doyle J (eds) Citizen voices, performing public participation in science and environment communication. Intellect Ltd, Chicago, pp 47–71
Felt U, Fochler M (2010) Machineries for making publics: inscribing and de-scribing publics in
public engagement. Minerva 48:219–238
Fiske J (1990) Introduction to communication studies, 2nd edn. Routledge, London
Frewer LJ (2003) Trust, transparency, and social context: implications for social amplifi cation of
risk. In: Pidgeon N, Kasperson RE, Slovic P (eds) The social amplifi cation of risk. Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge
Gilek M, Linke S, Udovyk O, Karlsson M, Lundberg C, Smolarz K, Lemke P (2011) Interactions
between risk assessment and risk management for environmental risks in the Baltic Sea.
Deliverable 9 within the RISKGOV project. Available from: http://www.sh.se/riskgov
9 Risk Communication and the Role of the Public: Towards Inclusive Environmental…
References
Aarhus Convention on Access to Information (1998) Public participation in decision-making and
access to justice in environmental matters
Anderson A (1997) Media culture and the environment. Routledge, London
Asp K (1986) Mäktiga massmedier. Studier i politisk opinionsbildning (in Swedish).
Akademilitteratur, Stockholm
Baltic 21 (2002) Agenda 21 for the Baltic Sea region sector report – education. Baltic 21. Series
No 02/2002
Beck U (1992) Risk society. Sage, London
Boström M, Grönholm S, Hassler B (2016) The ecosystem approach to management in Baltic Sea
governance: towards increased refl exivity? In: Gilek M et al (eds) Environmental governance
of the Baltic Sea. Springer, Dordrecht
Brake ML, Weitkamp E (2009) Introducing science communication. A practical guide. New York:
Palgrave Macmillan
Breakwell GM (2007) The psychology of risk. Cambridge University Press, New York
Bucchi M (2004) Can genetics help us rethink communication? Public communication of science
as a ‘double helix’. New Gen Soc 23(3):269–283
Bäckstrand K (2003) Civic science for sustainability: reframing the role of experts, policy-makers
and citizens in environmental governance. Glob Environ Polit 2003(3):24–41.
doi: 10.1162/152638003322757916
Castells M (2008) The new public sphere: global civil society, communication networks and global
governance. Ann Am Acad Polit Econ Sci 616(1):78–93
Cox R (2010) Environmental communication and the public sphere, 2nd edn. Sage, London
Dahlgren P (2005) The internet, public spheres, and political communication: dispersion and
deliberation. Polit Commun 22(2):147–162
De Marchi B (2003) Public participation and risk governance. Sci Public Policy 30(3):171–176
Dreyer M, Sellke P, Boström M, Jönsson AM, Hammer M, Renn O, Söderström S, Zgrundo A
(2011) Structures and processes of public and stakeholder communication connected to environmental risks in the Baltic Sea. Deliverable 10 within the RISKGOV project. Available
from: http://www.sh.se/riskgov
Dreyer M, Boström M, Jönsson AM (2014) Participatory deliberation, risk governance and management of the marine region in the European Union. J Environ Pol Plan. doi: 10.1080/15239
08X.2013.866891
European Commission (2001a) Sixth environment action plan 2001–2010. European Commission,
Brussels
European Commission (2001b) European governance. A white paper. COM (2001) 428 fi nal.
CEC, Brussels
Entman RM (1993) Framing: toward clarifi cation of a fractured paradigm. J Commun 43(4):51–
58. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
Egan Sjölander A, Jönsson AM (2012) Contested ethanol dreams – public participation in environmental news. In: Philips L, Carvalho A, Doyle J (eds) Citizen voices, performing public participation in science and environment communication. Intellect Ltd, Chicago, pp 47–71
Felt U, Fochler M (2010) Machineries for making publics: inscribing and de-scribing publics in
public engagement. Minerva 48:219–238
Fiske J (1990) Introduction to communication studies, 2nd edn. Routledge, London
Frewer LJ (2003) Trust, transparency, and social context: implications for social amplifi cation of
risk. In: Pidgeon N, Kasperson RE, Slovic P (eds) The social amplifi cation of risk. Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge
Gilek M, Linke S, Udovyk O, Karlsson M, Lundberg C, Smolarz K, Lemke P (2011) Interactions
between risk assessment and risk management for environmental risks in the Baltic Sea.
Deliverable 9 within the RISKGOV project. Available from: http://www.sh.se/riskgov
9 Risk Communication and the Role of the Public: Towards Inclusive Environmental…