278
References
1241. LHCb Collaboration, Angular analysis of the B 0 → K ∗0 μ + μ − decay using 3 fb −1 of
integrated luminosity. JHEP 02, 104 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP02(2016)104.
arXiv:1512.04442
1242. LHCb Collaboration, Test of lepton universality with B 0 → K ∗0 + − decays. JHEP 08,
055 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2017)055. arXiv:1705.05802
1243. LHCb Collaboration, Search for lepton-universality violation in B + → K + + − decays.
Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 191801 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.191801.
arXiv:1903.09252
1244. Muon g-2 Collaborations, G.W. Bennett et al., Final report of the muon E821 anomalous
magnetic moment measurement at BNL. Phys. Rev. D 73, 072003 (2006). https://doi.org/
10.1103/PhysRevD.73.072003. arXiv:hep-ex/0602035
1245. M. Davier, A. Hoecker, B. Malaescu, Z. Zhang, Reevaluation of the hadronic vacuum polarisation contributions to the Standard Model predictions of the muon g − 2 and α(m 2
Z ) using
newest hadronic cross-section data. Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 827 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1140/
epjc/s10052-017-5161-6. arXiv:1706.09436
1246. M. Tanaka, R. Watanabe, New physics in the weak interaction of ¯
B → D (∗) τ ¯
ν. Phys. Rev.
D 87, 034028 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.87.034028. arXiv:1212.1878
1247. Y. Sakaki, M. Tanaka, A. Tayduganov, R. Watanabe, Testing leptoquark models in ¯
B →
D (∗) τ ¯
ν. Phys. Rev. D 88, 094012 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.88.094012.
arXiv:1309.0301
1248. I. Doršner, S. Fajfer, N. Košnik, I. Niš, ži´ c, Minimally flavored colored scalar in ¯
B →
D (∗) τ ¯
ν and the mass matrices constraints. JHEP 11, 084 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/
JHEP11(2013)084. arXiv:1306.6493
1249. B. Dumont, K. Nishiwaki, R. Watanabe, LHC constraints and prospects for S 1 scalar leptoquark explaining the ¯
B → D (∗) τ ¯
ν anomaly. Phys. Rev. D 94, 034001 (2016). https://doi.
org/10.1103/PhysRevD.94.034001. arXiv:1603.05248
1250. B. Gripaios, M. Nardecchia, S.A. Renner, Composite leptoquarks and anomalies in b-meson
decays. JHEP 05, 006 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05(2015)006. arXiv:1412.1791
1251. M. Bauer, M. Neubert, Minimal leptoquark explanation for the R D (∗) , R K , and (g − 2) μ
anomalies. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 141802 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.
141802. arXiv:1511.01900
1252. E. Coluccio Leskow, G. D’Ambrosio, A. Crivellin, D. Müller, (g − 2) μ , lepton flavor violation, and Z decays with leptoquarks: correlations and future prospects. Phys. Rev. D 95,
055018 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.95.055018. arXiv:1612.06858
1253. D. Beˇ cirevi´ c, O. Sumensari, A leptoquark model to accommodate R
exp
K < R SM
K and R
exp
K ∗ <
R SM
K ∗ . JHEP 08, 104 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2017)104. arXiv:1704.05835
1254. G. Hiller, D. Loose, I. Nišandži´ c, Flavorful leptoquarks at hadron colliders. Phys. Rev. D
97, 075004 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.97.075004. arXiv:1801.09399
1255. E. Alvarez, L. Da Rold, A. Juste, M. Szewc, T. Vazquez Schroeder, A composite pNGB
leptoquark at the LHC. JHEP 12, 027 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP12(2018)027.
arXiv:1808.02063
1256. D. Buttazzo, A. Greljo, G. Isidori, D. Marzocca, B-physics anomalies: a guide to
combined explanations. JHEP 11, 044 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP11(2017)044.
arXiv:1706.07808
1257. M. Kramer, T. Plehn, M. Spira, P.M. Zerwas, Pair production of scalar leptoquarks at
the CERN LHC. Phys. Rev. D 71, 057503 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.71.
057503. arXiv:hep-ph/0411038
1258. I. Doršner, A. Greljo, Leptoquark toolbox for precision collider studies. JHEP 05, 126 (2018).
https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05(2018)126. arXiv:1801.07641
1259. M.J. Baker, J. Fuentes-Martín, G. Isidori, M. König, High- p T signatures in vector-leptoquark
models. Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 334 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6853-x.
arXiv:1901.10480
1260. D0 Collaboration, Search for third-generation leptoquarks in p¯ p collisions at
√
s = 1.96
TeV. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 061801 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.061801.
arXiv:0705.0812
References
1241. LHCb Collaboration, Angular analysis of the B 0 → K ∗0 μ + μ − decay using 3 fb −1 of
integrated luminosity. JHEP 02, 104 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP02(2016)104.
arXiv:1512.04442
1242. LHCb Collaboration, Test of lepton universality with B 0 → K ∗0 + − decays. JHEP 08,
055 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2017)055. arXiv:1705.05802
1243. LHCb Collaboration, Search for lepton-universality violation in B + → K + + − decays.
Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 191801 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.191801.
arXiv:1903.09252
1244. Muon g-2 Collaborations, G.W. Bennett et al., Final report of the muon E821 anomalous
magnetic moment measurement at BNL. Phys. Rev. D 73, 072003 (2006). https://doi.org/
10.1103/PhysRevD.73.072003. arXiv:hep-ex/0602035
1245. M. Davier, A. Hoecker, B. Malaescu, Z. Zhang, Reevaluation of the hadronic vacuum polarisation contributions to the Standard Model predictions of the muon g − 2 and α(m 2
Z ) using
newest hadronic cross-section data. Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 827 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1140/
epjc/s10052-017-5161-6. arXiv:1706.09436
1246. M. Tanaka, R. Watanabe, New physics in the weak interaction of ¯
B → D (∗) τ ¯
ν. Phys. Rev.
D 87, 034028 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.87.034028. arXiv:1212.1878
1247. Y. Sakaki, M. Tanaka, A. Tayduganov, R. Watanabe, Testing leptoquark models in ¯
B →
D (∗) τ ¯
ν. Phys. Rev. D 88, 094012 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.88.094012.
arXiv:1309.0301
1248. I. Doršner, S. Fajfer, N. Košnik, I. Niš, ži´ c, Minimally flavored colored scalar in ¯
B →
D (∗) τ ¯
ν and the mass matrices constraints. JHEP 11, 084 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/
JHEP11(2013)084. arXiv:1306.6493
1249. B. Dumont, K. Nishiwaki, R. Watanabe, LHC constraints and prospects for S 1 scalar leptoquark explaining the ¯
B → D (∗) τ ¯
ν anomaly. Phys. Rev. D 94, 034001 (2016). https://doi.
org/10.1103/PhysRevD.94.034001. arXiv:1603.05248
1250. B. Gripaios, M. Nardecchia, S.A. Renner, Composite leptoquarks and anomalies in b-meson
decays. JHEP 05, 006 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05(2015)006. arXiv:1412.1791
1251. M. Bauer, M. Neubert, Minimal leptoquark explanation for the R D (∗) , R K , and (g − 2) μ
anomalies. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 141802 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.
141802. arXiv:1511.01900
1252. E. Coluccio Leskow, G. D’Ambrosio, A. Crivellin, D. Müller, (g − 2) μ , lepton flavor violation, and Z decays with leptoquarks: correlations and future prospects. Phys. Rev. D 95,
055018 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.95.055018. arXiv:1612.06858
1253. D. Beˇ cirevi´ c, O. Sumensari, A leptoquark model to accommodate R
exp
K < R SM
K and R
exp
K ∗ <
R SM
K ∗ . JHEP 08, 104 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2017)104. arXiv:1704.05835
1254. G. Hiller, D. Loose, I. Nišandži´ c, Flavorful leptoquarks at hadron colliders. Phys. Rev. D
97, 075004 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.97.075004. arXiv:1801.09399
1255. E. Alvarez, L. Da Rold, A. Juste, M. Szewc, T. Vazquez Schroeder, A composite pNGB
leptoquark at the LHC. JHEP 12, 027 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP12(2018)027.
arXiv:1808.02063
1256. D. Buttazzo, A. Greljo, G. Isidori, D. Marzocca, B-physics anomalies: a guide to
combined explanations. JHEP 11, 044 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP11(2017)044.
arXiv:1706.07808
1257. M. Kramer, T. Plehn, M. Spira, P.M. Zerwas, Pair production of scalar leptoquarks at
the CERN LHC. Phys. Rev. D 71, 057503 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.71.
057503. arXiv:hep-ph/0411038
1258. I. Doršner, A. Greljo, Leptoquark toolbox for precision collider studies. JHEP 05, 126 (2018).
https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05(2018)126. arXiv:1801.07641
1259. M.J. Baker, J. Fuentes-Martín, G. Isidori, M. König, High- p T signatures in vector-leptoquark
models. Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 334 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6853-x.
arXiv:1901.10480
1260. D0 Collaboration, Search for third-generation leptoquarks in p¯ p collisions at
√
s = 1.96
TeV. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 061801 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.061801.
arXiv:0705.0812