References
257
840. F. del Aguila, M. Perez-Victoria, J. Santiago, Effective description of quark mixing. Phys. Lett. B 492, 98 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-2693(00)01071-6.
arXiv:hep-ph/0007160
841. F. del Aguila, M. Perez-Victoria, J. Santiago, Observable contributions of new exotic quarks
to quark mixing. JHEP 09, 011 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2000/09/011.
arXiv:hep-ph/0007316
842. G. Azuelos et al., Exploring little Higgs models with ATLAS at the LHC. Eur. Phys. J. C
39S2, 13 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjcd/s2004-02-002-x. arXiv:hep-ph/0402037
843. Y. Okada, L. Panizzi, LHC signatures of vector-like quarks. Adv. High Energy Phys. 2013,
364936 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/364936. arXiv:1207.5607
844. A. De Simone, O. Matsedonskyi, R. Rattazzi, A. Wulzer, A first top partner hunter’s guide.
JHEP 04, 004 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2013)004. arXiv:1211.5663
845. O. Matsedonskyi, G. Panico, A. Wulzer, Top partners searches and composite Higgs models.
JHEP 04, 003 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2016)003. arXiv:1512.04356
846. A. Angelescu, A. Djouadi, G. Moreau, Vector-like top/bottom quark partners and Higgs
physics at the LHC. Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 99 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052016-3950-y. arXiv:1510.07527
847. M.J. Dolan, J. Hewett, M. Krämer, T. Rizzo, Simplified models for Higgs physics: Singlet
scalar and vector-like quark phenomenology. JHEP 07, 039 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/
JHEP07(2016)039. arXiv:1601.07208
848. B. Fuks, H.-S. Shao, QCD next-to-leading-order predictions matched to parton showers
for vector-like quark models. Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 135 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/
s10052-017-4686-z. arXiv:1610.04622
849. A. Carvalho, S. Moretti, D. O’Brien, L. Panizzi, H. Prager, Single production of vectorlike
quarks with large width at the Large Hadron Collider. Phys. Rev. D 98, 015029 (2018).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.98.015029. arXiv:1805.06402
850. M. Perelstein, M.E. Peskin, A. Pierce, Top quarks and electroweak symmetry breaking in
little Higgs models. Phys. Rev. D 69, 075002 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.69.
075002. arXiv:hep-ph/0310039
851. G. Dissertori, E. Furlan, F. Moortgat, P. Nef, Discovery potential of top-partners in a realistic
composite Higgs model with early LHC data. JHEP 09, 019 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/
JHEP09(2010)019. arXiv:1005.4414
852. K. Agashe, R. Contino, A. Pomarol, The minimal composite Higgs model. Nucl. Phys. B
719, 165 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2005.04.035. arXiv:hep-ph/0412089
853. O. Matsedonskyi, G. Panico, A. Wulzer, Light top partners for a light composite Higgs.
JHEP 01, 164 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP01(2013)164. arXiv:1204.6333
854. B. Bellazzini, C. Csáki, J. Serra, Composite Higgses. Eur. Phys. J. C 74, 2766 (2014). https://
doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-2766-x. arXiv:1401.2457
855. D.B. Kaplan, Flavor at SSC energies: a new mechanism for dynamically generated fermion
masses. Nucl. Phys. B 365, 259 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0550-3213(05)80021-5
856. I. Antoniadis, K. Benakli, M. Quiros, Finite Higgs mass without supersymmetry. New J.
Phys. 3, 20 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/3/1/320. arXiv:hep-th/0108005
857. R. Contino, L. Da Rold, A. Pomarol, Light custodians in natural composite Higgs
models. Phys. Rev. D 75, 055014 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.75.055014.
arXiv:hep-ph/0612048
858. J.L. Hewett, T.G. Rizzo, Low-energy phenomenology of superstring inspired E(6) models.
Phys. Rept. 183, 193 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-1573(89)90071-9
859. M. Buchkremer, G. Cacciapaglia, A. Deandrea, L. Panizzi, Model independent framework for searches of top partners. Nucl. Phys. B 876, 376 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
nuclphysb.2013.08.010. arXiv:1305.4172
860. CMS Collaboration, Search for vector-like T and B quark pairs in final states with leptons at
√
s = 13 TeV. JHEP 08, 177 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2018)177.
arXiv:1805.04758
257
840. F. del Aguila, M. Perez-Victoria, J. Santiago, Effective description of quark mixing. Phys. Lett. B 492, 98 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-2693(00)01071-6.
arXiv:hep-ph/0007160
841. F. del Aguila, M. Perez-Victoria, J. Santiago, Observable contributions of new exotic quarks
to quark mixing. JHEP 09, 011 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2000/09/011.
arXiv:hep-ph/0007316
842. G. Azuelos et al., Exploring little Higgs models with ATLAS at the LHC. Eur. Phys. J. C
39S2, 13 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjcd/s2004-02-002-x. arXiv:hep-ph/0402037
843. Y. Okada, L. Panizzi, LHC signatures of vector-like quarks. Adv. High Energy Phys. 2013,
364936 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/364936. arXiv:1207.5607
844. A. De Simone, O. Matsedonskyi, R. Rattazzi, A. Wulzer, A first top partner hunter’s guide.
JHEP 04, 004 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2013)004. arXiv:1211.5663
845. O. Matsedonskyi, G. Panico, A. Wulzer, Top partners searches and composite Higgs models.
JHEP 04, 003 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2016)003. arXiv:1512.04356
846. A. Angelescu, A. Djouadi, G. Moreau, Vector-like top/bottom quark partners and Higgs
physics at the LHC. Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 99 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052016-3950-y. arXiv:1510.07527
847. M.J. Dolan, J. Hewett, M. Krämer, T. Rizzo, Simplified models for Higgs physics: Singlet
scalar and vector-like quark phenomenology. JHEP 07, 039 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/
JHEP07(2016)039. arXiv:1601.07208
848. B. Fuks, H.-S. Shao, QCD next-to-leading-order predictions matched to parton showers
for vector-like quark models. Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 135 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/
s10052-017-4686-z. arXiv:1610.04622
849. A. Carvalho, S. Moretti, D. O’Brien, L. Panizzi, H. Prager, Single production of vectorlike
quarks with large width at the Large Hadron Collider. Phys. Rev. D 98, 015029 (2018).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.98.015029. arXiv:1805.06402
850. M. Perelstein, M.E. Peskin, A. Pierce, Top quarks and electroweak symmetry breaking in
little Higgs models. Phys. Rev. D 69, 075002 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.69.
075002. arXiv:hep-ph/0310039
851. G. Dissertori, E. Furlan, F. Moortgat, P. Nef, Discovery potential of top-partners in a realistic
composite Higgs model with early LHC data. JHEP 09, 019 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/
JHEP09(2010)019. arXiv:1005.4414
852. K. Agashe, R. Contino, A. Pomarol, The minimal composite Higgs model. Nucl. Phys. B
719, 165 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2005.04.035. arXiv:hep-ph/0412089
853. O. Matsedonskyi, G. Panico, A. Wulzer, Light top partners for a light composite Higgs.
JHEP 01, 164 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP01(2013)164. arXiv:1204.6333
854. B. Bellazzini, C. Csáki, J. Serra, Composite Higgses. Eur. Phys. J. C 74, 2766 (2014). https://
doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-2766-x. arXiv:1401.2457
855. D.B. Kaplan, Flavor at SSC energies: a new mechanism for dynamically generated fermion
masses. Nucl. Phys. B 365, 259 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0550-3213(05)80021-5
856. I. Antoniadis, K. Benakli, M. Quiros, Finite Higgs mass without supersymmetry. New J.
Phys. 3, 20 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/3/1/320. arXiv:hep-th/0108005
857. R. Contino, L. Da Rold, A. Pomarol, Light custodians in natural composite Higgs
models. Phys. Rev. D 75, 055014 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.75.055014.
arXiv:hep-ph/0612048
858. J.L. Hewett, T.G. Rizzo, Low-energy phenomenology of superstring inspired E(6) models.
Phys. Rept. 183, 193 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-1573(89)90071-9
859. M. Buchkremer, G. Cacciapaglia, A. Deandrea, L. Panizzi, Model independent framework for searches of top partners. Nucl. Phys. B 876, 376 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
nuclphysb.2013.08.010. arXiv:1305.4172
860. CMS Collaboration, Search for vector-like T and B quark pairs in final states with leptons at
√
s = 13 TeV. JHEP 08, 177 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2018)177.
arXiv:1805.04758