228
References
266. C.W. Bauer, I.W. Stewart, Invariant operators in collinear effective theory. Phys. Lett. B 516,
134, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-2693(01)00902-9. arXiv:hep-ph/0107001
267. C.W. Bauer, D. Pirjol, I.W. Stewart, Soft collinear factorization in effective field theory. Phys. Rev. D 65, 054022 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.65.054022.
arXiv:hep-ph/0109045
268. M. Beneke, A.P. Chapovsky, M. Diehl, T. Feldmann, Soft collinear effective theory and
heavy to light currents beyond leading power. Nucl. Phys. B 643, 431 (2002). https://doi.
org/10.1016/S0550-3213(02)00687-9. arXiv:hep-ph/0206152
269. M. Beneke, T. Feldmann, Multipole expanded soft collinear effective theory with nonAbelian gauge symmetry. Phys. Lett. B 553, 267 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S03702693(02)03204-5. arXiv:hep-ph/0211358
270. R.J. Hill, M. Neubert, Spectator interactions in soft collinear effective theory. Nucl. Phys. B
657, 229 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0550-3213(03)00116-0. arXiv:hep-ph/0211018
271. T. Becher, A. Broggio, A. Ferroglia, Introduction to soft-collinear effective theory. Lect.
Notes Phys. 896, 337 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14848-9. arXiv:1410.1892
272. M. Bonvini, S. Forte, M. Ghezzi, G. Ridolfi, Threshold resummation in SCET vs. perturbative
QCD: an analytic comparison. Nucl. Phys. B 861, 337 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
nuclphysb.2012.04.010. arXiv:1201.6364
273. M. Bonvini, S. Forte, M. Ghezzi, G. Ridolfi, The scale of soft resummation in SCET vs
perturbative QCD. Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 241, 121 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
nuclphysbps.2013.06.020. arXiv:1301.4502
274. M. Bonvini, S. Forte, G. Ridolfi, L. Rottoli, Resummation prescriptions and ambiguities in
SCET vs. direct QCD: Higgs production as a case study. JHEP 01, 046 (2015). https://doi.
org/10.1007/JHEP01(2015)046. arXiv:1409.0864
275. L.G. Almeida, S.D. Ellis, C. Lee, G. Sterman, I. Sung, J.R. Walsh, Comparing and counting
logs in direct and effective methods of QCD resummation. JHEP 04, 174 (2014). https://
doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2014)174. arXiv:1401.4460
276. F. Bloch, A. Nordsieck, Note on the radiation field of the electron. Phys. Rev. 52, 54 (1937)
277. T. Kinoshita, Mass singularities of Feynman amplitudes. J. Math. Phys. 3, 650 (1962)
278. T. Lee, M. Nauenberg, Degenerate systems and mass singularities. Phys. Rev. B 133, 1549
(1964)
279. A. Banfi, G. Marchesini, G. Smye, Away from jet energy flow. JHEP 08, 006 (2002). https://
doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2002/08/006. arXiv:hep-ph/0206076
280. M.D. Schwartz, H.X. Zhu, Nonglobal logarithms at three loops, four loops, five loops, and
beyond. Phys. Rev. D 90, 065004 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.90.065004.
arXiv:1403.4949
281. K. Khelifa-Kerfa, Y. Delenda, Non-global logarithms at finite N c beyond leading order. JHEP
03, 094 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2015)094. arXiv:1501.00475
282. M. Dasgupta, K. Khelifa-Kerfa, S. Marzani, M. Spannowsky, On jet mass distributions
in Z +jet and dijet processes at the LHC. JHEP 10, 126 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/
JHEP10(2012)126. arXiv:1207.1640
283. I.W. Stewart, F.J. Tackmann, W.J. Waalewijn, Factorization at the LHC: from PDFs to initial
state jets. Phys. Rev. D 81, 094035 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.81.094035.
arXiv:0910.0467
284. C.W. Bauer, A. Hornig, F.J. Tackmann, Factorization for generic jet production. Phys. Rev.
D 79, 114013 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.79.114013. arXiv:0808.2191
285. A.J. Larkoski, I. Moult, D. Neill, Non-global logarithms, factorization, and the soft
substructure of jets. JHEP 09, 143(2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2015)143.
arXiv:1501.04596
286. Y.-T. Chien, I. Vitev, Jet shape resummation using soft-collinear effective theory. JHEP 12,
061 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP12(2014)061. arXiv:1405.4293
287. A. Hornig, Y. Makris, T. Mehen, Jet shapes in dijet events at the LHC in SCET. JHEP 04,
097 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2016)097. arXiv:1601.01319
References
266. C.W. Bauer, I.W. Stewart, Invariant operators in collinear effective theory. Phys. Lett. B 516,
134, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-2693(01)00902-9. arXiv:hep-ph/0107001
267. C.W. Bauer, D. Pirjol, I.W. Stewart, Soft collinear factorization in effective field theory. Phys. Rev. D 65, 054022 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.65.054022.
arXiv:hep-ph/0109045
268. M. Beneke, A.P. Chapovsky, M. Diehl, T. Feldmann, Soft collinear effective theory and
heavy to light currents beyond leading power. Nucl. Phys. B 643, 431 (2002). https://doi.
org/10.1016/S0550-3213(02)00687-9. arXiv:hep-ph/0206152
269. M. Beneke, T. Feldmann, Multipole expanded soft collinear effective theory with nonAbelian gauge symmetry. Phys. Lett. B 553, 267 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S03702693(02)03204-5. arXiv:hep-ph/0211358
270. R.J. Hill, M. Neubert, Spectator interactions in soft collinear effective theory. Nucl. Phys. B
657, 229 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0550-3213(03)00116-0. arXiv:hep-ph/0211018
271. T. Becher, A. Broggio, A. Ferroglia, Introduction to soft-collinear effective theory. Lect.
Notes Phys. 896, 337 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14848-9. arXiv:1410.1892
272. M. Bonvini, S. Forte, M. Ghezzi, G. Ridolfi, Threshold resummation in SCET vs. perturbative
QCD: an analytic comparison. Nucl. Phys. B 861, 337 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
nuclphysb.2012.04.010. arXiv:1201.6364
273. M. Bonvini, S. Forte, M. Ghezzi, G. Ridolfi, The scale of soft resummation in SCET vs
perturbative QCD. Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 241, 121 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
nuclphysbps.2013.06.020. arXiv:1301.4502
274. M. Bonvini, S. Forte, G. Ridolfi, L. Rottoli, Resummation prescriptions and ambiguities in
SCET vs. direct QCD: Higgs production as a case study. JHEP 01, 046 (2015). https://doi.
org/10.1007/JHEP01(2015)046. arXiv:1409.0864
275. L.G. Almeida, S.D. Ellis, C. Lee, G. Sterman, I. Sung, J.R. Walsh, Comparing and counting
logs in direct and effective methods of QCD resummation. JHEP 04, 174 (2014). https://
doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2014)174. arXiv:1401.4460
276. F. Bloch, A. Nordsieck, Note on the radiation field of the electron. Phys. Rev. 52, 54 (1937)
277. T. Kinoshita, Mass singularities of Feynman amplitudes. J. Math. Phys. 3, 650 (1962)
278. T. Lee, M. Nauenberg, Degenerate systems and mass singularities. Phys. Rev. B 133, 1549
(1964)
279. A. Banfi, G. Marchesini, G. Smye, Away from jet energy flow. JHEP 08, 006 (2002). https://
doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2002/08/006. arXiv:hep-ph/0206076
280. M.D. Schwartz, H.X. Zhu, Nonglobal logarithms at three loops, four loops, five loops, and
beyond. Phys. Rev. D 90, 065004 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.90.065004.
arXiv:1403.4949
281. K. Khelifa-Kerfa, Y. Delenda, Non-global logarithms at finite N c beyond leading order. JHEP
03, 094 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2015)094. arXiv:1501.00475
282. M. Dasgupta, K. Khelifa-Kerfa, S. Marzani, M. Spannowsky, On jet mass distributions
in Z +jet and dijet processes at the LHC. JHEP 10, 126 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/
JHEP10(2012)126. arXiv:1207.1640
283. I.W. Stewart, F.J. Tackmann, W.J. Waalewijn, Factorization at the LHC: from PDFs to initial
state jets. Phys. Rev. D 81, 094035 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.81.094035.
arXiv:0910.0467
284. C.W. Bauer, A. Hornig, F.J. Tackmann, Factorization for generic jet production. Phys. Rev.
D 79, 114013 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.79.114013. arXiv:0808.2191
285. A.J. Larkoski, I. Moult, D. Neill, Non-global logarithms, factorization, and the soft
substructure of jets. JHEP 09, 143(2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2015)143.
arXiv:1501.04596
286. Y.-T. Chien, I. Vitev, Jet shape resummation using soft-collinear effective theory. JHEP 12,
061 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP12(2014)061. arXiv:1405.4293
287. A. Hornig, Y. Makris, T. Mehen, Jet shapes in dijet events at the LHC in SCET. JHEP 04,
097 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2016)097. arXiv:1601.01319