5G Positioning: Security and Privacy Aspects 317
68 Gašparović, M., Nicolau, P., Marques, A., Silva, C. and Marcelino, L. (2016) On privacy
in user tracking mobile applications. Proceedings of the 11th Iberian Conference on
Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI), Las Palmas, pp. 1–6.
69 Gupta, M., Gao, J., Aggarwal, C.C. and Han, J. (2014) Outlier detection for temporal
data: a survey. Proceedings of the IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data
Engineering, 26(9), 2250–2267.
70 Koivisto, M., Costa, M., Hakkarainen, A., Leppänen, K. and Valkama, M. (2016) Joint
3D positioning and network synchronization in 5G ultra‐dense networks using UKF
and EKF. Accepted for publication in IEEE International Workshop on Localization and
Tracking: Indoors, Outdoors, and Emerging Networks (GLOBECOM Workshops),
December 2016
71 Paez, M. and La Marca, M. (2016) The Internet of Things – emerging legal issues for
businesses. Northern Kentucky Law Review, 43(1), 29–71.
72 Svensson, M., Paladi, N. and Giustolisi, R. (2015) 5G: Towards secure ubiquitous
connectivity beyond 2020. ICS Report. Available at: http://soda.swedishict.se/5933/1/
T2015_08.pdf
73 Bhuiyan, M.Z.H., Kuusniemi, H., Söderholm, S. and Airos, E. (2013) The impact of
interference on GNSS receiver observables – a running digital sum based simple
jammer detector. Radio Engineering, 23(3), 898–906. Available at: http://www.radioeng.
cz/fulltexts/2014/14_03_0898_0906.pdf
74 Agarwal, N., Basch, J., Beckmann, P., Bharti, P., Bloebaum, S. et al. (2002) Algorithms
for GPS operation indoors and downtown. GPS Solutions, 6(3), 149–160.
75 Bhushan, N., Li, J., Malladi, D., Gilmore, R., Brenner, et al. (2014) Network
densification: the dominant theme for wireless evolution into 5G. IEEE
Communications Magazine, 52(2), 82–89.
76 Fei, N., Zhuang, Y., Gu, J., Cao, J. and L. Yang, L. (2015) Privacy‐preserving relative
location based services for mobile users. China Communications, 12(5), 152–161.
77 National Institute of Standards and Technology (2008) The Keyed‐Hash Message
Authentication Code (HMAC). FIPS PUB 198‐1. Available at: http://csrc.nist.gov/
publications/fips/fips198‐1/FIPS‐198‐1_final.pdf
78 National Institute of Standards and Technology, Digital Signature Standard (DSS)
(2013) FIPS PUB 186–4. Available at: http://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/FIPS/NIST.
FIPS.186‐4.pdf
79 National Institute of Standards and Technology, Secure Hash Standard (2015)
FIPS PUB 180–4 Available at: http://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/FIPS/NIST.
FIPS.180‐4.pdf
80 National Institute of Standards and Technology. Advanced Encryption Standard (AES)
(2001) FIPS PUB 197. Available at: http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/fips/fips197/
fips‐197.pdf
81 NGMN Alliance (2015) 5G White Paper. Available at: https://www.ngmn.org/5 g‐white‐
paper/5 g‐white‐paper.html
82 NSF search tool. Available at: http://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/
83 Garcia‐Morchon, O., Keoh, S., Kumar, S., Hummen, R. and Struik, R. (2013) Security
considerations in the IP‐based Internet of Things. IETF Internet‐Draft.
84 Kerr, O.S. (2007) Four models of fourth amendment protection. Stanford Law Review,
60(2), 503–551.
68 Gašparović, M., Nicolau, P., Marques, A., Silva, C. and Marcelino, L. (2016) On privacy
in user tracking mobile applications. Proceedings of the 11th Iberian Conference on
Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI), Las Palmas, pp. 1–6.
69 Gupta, M., Gao, J., Aggarwal, C.C. and Han, J. (2014) Outlier detection for temporal
data: a survey. Proceedings of the IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data
Engineering, 26(9), 2250–2267.
70 Koivisto, M., Costa, M., Hakkarainen, A., Leppänen, K. and Valkama, M. (2016) Joint
3D positioning and network synchronization in 5G ultra‐dense networks using UKF
and EKF. Accepted for publication in IEEE International Workshop on Localization and
Tracking: Indoors, Outdoors, and Emerging Networks (GLOBECOM Workshops),
December 2016
71 Paez, M. and La Marca, M. (2016) The Internet of Things – emerging legal issues for
businesses. Northern Kentucky Law Review, 43(1), 29–71.
72 Svensson, M., Paladi, N. and Giustolisi, R. (2015) 5G: Towards secure ubiquitous
connectivity beyond 2020. ICS Report. Available at: http://soda.swedishict.se/5933/1/
T2015_08.pdf
73 Bhuiyan, M.Z.H., Kuusniemi, H., Söderholm, S. and Airos, E. (2013) The impact of
interference on GNSS receiver observables – a running digital sum based simple
jammer detector. Radio Engineering, 23(3), 898–906. Available at: http://www.radioeng.
cz/fulltexts/2014/14_03_0898_0906.pdf
74 Agarwal, N., Basch, J., Beckmann, P., Bharti, P., Bloebaum, S. et al. (2002) Algorithms
for GPS operation indoors and downtown. GPS Solutions, 6(3), 149–160.
75 Bhushan, N., Li, J., Malladi, D., Gilmore, R., Brenner, et al. (2014) Network
densification: the dominant theme for wireless evolution into 5G. IEEE
Communications Magazine, 52(2), 82–89.
76 Fei, N., Zhuang, Y., Gu, J., Cao, J. and L. Yang, L. (2015) Privacy‐preserving relative
location based services for mobile users. China Communications, 12(5), 152–161.
77 National Institute of Standards and Technology (2008) The Keyed‐Hash Message
Authentication Code (HMAC). FIPS PUB 198‐1. Available at: http://csrc.nist.gov/
publications/fips/fips198‐1/FIPS‐198‐1_final.pdf
78 National Institute of Standards and Technology, Digital Signature Standard (DSS)
(2013) FIPS PUB 186–4. Available at: http://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/FIPS/NIST.
FIPS.186‐4.pdf
79 National Institute of Standards and Technology, Secure Hash Standard (2015)
FIPS PUB 180–4 Available at: http://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/FIPS/NIST.
FIPS.180‐4.pdf
80 National Institute of Standards and Technology. Advanced Encryption Standard (AES)
(2001) FIPS PUB 197. Available at: http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/fips/fips197/
fips‐197.pdf
81 NGMN Alliance (2015) 5G White Paper. Available at: https://www.ngmn.org/5 g‐white‐
paper/5 g‐white‐paper.html
82 NSF search tool. Available at: http://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/
83 Garcia‐Morchon, O., Keoh, S., Kumar, S., Hummen, R. and Struik, R. (2013) Security
considerations in the IP‐based Internet of Things. IETF Internet‐Draft.
84 Kerr, O.S. (2007) Four models of fourth amendment protection. Stanford Law Review,
60(2), 503–551.