17 Upcoming Challenges in Land Use Science—An International Perspective
331
Freitas, F. L., Sparovek, G., Berndes, G., Persson, U. M., Englund, O., Barretto, A., & Mörtberg, U.
(2018). Potential increase of legal deforestation in Brazilian Amazon after Forest Act revision.
Nature Sustainability, 1(11), 665.
Friend, R. M., Thankappan, S., Doherty, B., Aung, N., Beringer, A. L., Kimseng, C., Cole, R.,
Immuong, Y., Mortensen, S., Nyunt, W.W., Paavola, J., Prombhakping, B., Salamanca, A., Soben,
K., Win, S., Win, S., Yang, N. (2019). Agricultural and food systems in the Mekong region:
Drivers of transformation and pathways of change. Emerald Open Research, 1(12), https://doi.
org/10.12688/emeraldopenres.13104.1.
Friis, C., Nielsen, J. Ø, Otero, I., Haberl, H., Niewöhner, J., & Hostert, P. (2016). From teleconnection
to telecoupling: Taking stock of an emerging framework in land system science. Journal of Land
Use Science, 11(2), 131–153.
Froese, R., & Schilling, J. (2019). The Nexus of climate change, land use, and conflicts. Current
Climate Change Reports, 5(1), 24–35.
From Noordwijk, R. (1990). United Nations Activities. In Environmental Policy and Law, (vol. 20,
p. 71).
Fry, G. L. (2001). Multifunctional landscapes—Towards transdisciplinary research. Landscape and
Urban Planning, 57(3), 159–168.
Fürst, C., Luque, S., & Geneletti, D. (2017). Nexus thinking–How ecosystem services can contribute
to enhancing the cross-scale and cross-sectoral coherence between land use, spatial planning
and policy-making. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services and
Management, 13(1), 412–421.
Garrett, R., Rueda, X. (2019). Telecoupling and consumption in agri-food systems. In Telecoupling
(pp. 115–137). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
Gasparri, N. I., Kuemmerle, T., Meyfroidt, P., Polain, Le., de Waroux, Y., & Kreft, H. (2016). The
emerging soybean production frontier in Southern Africa: Conservation challenges and the role
of south–south telecouplings. Conservation Letters, 9(1), 21–31.
Gentle, P., Thwaites, R., Race, D., Alexander, K., Maraseni, T. (2018). Household and community
responses to impacts of climate change in the rural hills of Nepal. Climatic Change, 147(1–2),
267–282.
Gómez-Baggethun, E., De Groot, R., Lomas, P. L., & Montes, C. (2010). The history of ecosystem
services in economic theory and practice: From early notions to markets and payment schemes.
Ecological Economics, 69(6), 1209–1218.
Gu, Y., Deal, B., & Larsen, L. (2018). Geodesign processes and ecological systems thinking
in a coupled human-environment context: an integrated framework for landscape architecture.
Sustainability, 10(9), 3306.
Haines-Young, R., Potschin, M. (2012). Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services
(CICES, Version 4.1). European Environment Agency (vol. 33).
Hák, T., Janoušková, S., & Moldan, B. (2016). Sustainable development Goals: A need for relevant
indicators. Ecological Indicators, 60, 565–573.
Hansson, S., & Polk, M. (2018). Assessing the impact of transdisciplinary research: The usefulness
of relevance, credibility, and legitimacy for understanding the link between process and impact.
Research Evaluation, 27(2), 132–144.
Harvey, M., & Pilgrim, S. (2011). The new competition for land: Food, energy, and climate change.
Food Policy, 36, S40–S51.
Harwood, R. R. (1990). A history of sustainable agriculture. In: Edwards, C.I., Lal, R., Madden, P.,
Miller, R.H., House, G. (Eds.) Sustainable Agricultural Systems, pp. 3–19.
Hull, V., Liu, J. (2018). Telecoupling: A new frontier for global sustainability. Ecology and Society,
23(4).
Ignatieva, M., & Ahrné, K. (2013). Biodiverse green infrastructure for the 21st century: From “green
desert” of lawns to biophilic cities. Journal of Architecture and Urbanism, 37(1), 1–9.
IPBES (Intergovernmental Panel for Biodiversity and Ecosystem services). (2019). Global Assessment—Summary for Policy Makers. https://www.ipbes.net/sites/default/files/downloads/spm_
unedited_advance_for_posting_htn.pdf. Accessed online, July, 22, 2019.
331
Freitas, F. L., Sparovek, G., Berndes, G., Persson, U. M., Englund, O., Barretto, A., & Mörtberg, U.
(2018). Potential increase of legal deforestation in Brazilian Amazon after Forest Act revision.
Nature Sustainability, 1(11), 665.
Friend, R. M., Thankappan, S., Doherty, B., Aung, N., Beringer, A. L., Kimseng, C., Cole, R.,
Immuong, Y., Mortensen, S., Nyunt, W.W., Paavola, J., Prombhakping, B., Salamanca, A., Soben,
K., Win, S., Win, S., Yang, N. (2019). Agricultural and food systems in the Mekong region:
Drivers of transformation and pathways of change. Emerald Open Research, 1(12), https://doi.
org/10.12688/emeraldopenres.13104.1.
Friis, C., Nielsen, J. Ø, Otero, I., Haberl, H., Niewöhner, J., & Hostert, P. (2016). From teleconnection
to telecoupling: Taking stock of an emerging framework in land system science. Journal of Land
Use Science, 11(2), 131–153.
Froese, R., & Schilling, J. (2019). The Nexus of climate change, land use, and conflicts. Current
Climate Change Reports, 5(1), 24–35.
From Noordwijk, R. (1990). United Nations Activities. In Environmental Policy and Law, (vol. 20,
p. 71).
Fry, G. L. (2001). Multifunctional landscapes—Towards transdisciplinary research. Landscape and
Urban Planning, 57(3), 159–168.
Fürst, C., Luque, S., & Geneletti, D. (2017). Nexus thinking–How ecosystem services can contribute
to enhancing the cross-scale and cross-sectoral coherence between land use, spatial planning
and policy-making. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services and
Management, 13(1), 412–421.
Garrett, R., Rueda, X. (2019). Telecoupling and consumption in agri-food systems. In Telecoupling
(pp. 115–137). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
Gasparri, N. I., Kuemmerle, T., Meyfroidt, P., Polain, Le., de Waroux, Y., & Kreft, H. (2016). The
emerging soybean production frontier in Southern Africa: Conservation challenges and the role
of south–south telecouplings. Conservation Letters, 9(1), 21–31.
Gentle, P., Thwaites, R., Race, D., Alexander, K., Maraseni, T. (2018). Household and community
responses to impacts of climate change in the rural hills of Nepal. Climatic Change, 147(1–2),
267–282.
Gómez-Baggethun, E., De Groot, R., Lomas, P. L., & Montes, C. (2010). The history of ecosystem
services in economic theory and practice: From early notions to markets and payment schemes.
Ecological Economics, 69(6), 1209–1218.
Gu, Y., Deal, B., & Larsen, L. (2018). Geodesign processes and ecological systems thinking
in a coupled human-environment context: an integrated framework for landscape architecture.
Sustainability, 10(9), 3306.
Haines-Young, R., Potschin, M. (2012). Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services
(CICES, Version 4.1). European Environment Agency (vol. 33).
Hák, T., Janoušková, S., & Moldan, B. (2016). Sustainable development Goals: A need for relevant
indicators. Ecological Indicators, 60, 565–573.
Hansson, S., & Polk, M. (2018). Assessing the impact of transdisciplinary research: The usefulness
of relevance, credibility, and legitimacy for understanding the link between process and impact.
Research Evaluation, 27(2), 132–144.
Harvey, M., & Pilgrim, S. (2011). The new competition for land: Food, energy, and climate change.
Food Policy, 36, S40–S51.
Harwood, R. R. (1990). A history of sustainable agriculture. In: Edwards, C.I., Lal, R., Madden, P.,
Miller, R.H., House, G. (Eds.) Sustainable Agricultural Systems, pp. 3–19.
Hull, V., Liu, J. (2018). Telecoupling: A new frontier for global sustainability. Ecology and Society,
23(4).
Ignatieva, M., & Ahrné, K. (2013). Biodiverse green infrastructure for the 21st century: From “green
desert” of lawns to biophilic cities. Journal of Architecture and Urbanism, 37(1), 1–9.
IPBES (Intergovernmental Panel for Biodiversity and Ecosystem services). (2019). Global Assessment—Summary for Policy Makers. https://www.ipbes.net/sites/default/files/downloads/spm_
unedited_advance_for_posting_htn.pdf. Accessed online, July, 22, 2019.