246
A. M. A. Saja et al.
I. Two days of Community Resilience Framework Training—I (PDRA) attendance as a participant.
II. Facilitating Participatory Disaster Risk Assessment (PDRA) at the respective
division.
III. Two days of Community Resilience Framework Training—II attendance as a
participant.
IV. Facilitating Risk Sensitive—Village Development Plan (RS-VDP) at the
respective division.
The following key lessons from implementing cascading capacity-building
programs were identified: the complete process is said to be “lead by, facilitated by,
undertaken by” the responsible state officials and their departments, the combination
of development and DM state officials lead by the departments of District/Divisional
Development Planning and District DMC have formed a greater drive, a sense of
responsibility is created to act according to the action plan drawn at the end of the
training programs, the format of CRF training into two sectional training programs
and the time gap allowed between is found to be an effective approach and could
be the best way of delivering CRF training modules at the district/divisional level
(Fig. 13.3).
Fig. 13.3 CRF cascading training strategy. Source (Authors)
A. M. A. Saja et al.
I. Two days of Community Resilience Framework Training—I (PDRA) attendance as a participant.
II. Facilitating Participatory Disaster Risk Assessment (PDRA) at the respective
division.
III. Two days of Community Resilience Framework Training—II attendance as a
participant.
IV. Facilitating Risk Sensitive—Village Development Plan (RS-VDP) at the
respective division.
The following key lessons from implementing cascading capacity-building
programs were identified: the complete process is said to be “lead by, facilitated by,
undertaken by” the responsible state officials and their departments, the combination
of development and DM state officials lead by the departments of District/Divisional
Development Planning and District DMC have formed a greater drive, a sense of
responsibility is created to act according to the action plan drawn at the end of the
training programs, the format of CRF training into two sectional training programs
and the time gap allowed between is found to be an effective approach and could
be the best way of delivering CRF training modules at the district/divisional level
(Fig. 13.3).
Fig. 13.3 CRF cascading training strategy. Source (Authors)