7 Comparative GIS-Based Assessment …
133
Table
7.5 Landslide susceptibility
index classification
S. no
Landslide susceptibility index Susceptibility class
1
<0.62
Low
2
0.62–0.64
Medium
3
0.64–0.645
High
4
0.645–0.7309
Very high
Fig. 7.20 ROC for SIM
Fig. 7.21 ROC for LRM
Acknowledgements On behalf of all the authors, I am thankful to the Central Department of
Environmental Science, Tribhuvan University, Nepal for giving this opportunity and HI-AWARE,
ICIMOD for the technical and financial support to carry out this research. I am pleased to express my
deepest gratitude to Dr. Deo Raj Gurung, Aga Khan Development Network (AKDN), Tajikistan,
Dr. Uttam Paudel, Housing Recovery and Reconstruction Platform (HRRP) for their invaluable
guidance throughout my study. I would also like to thank Mr. Ajay Shrestha, Mr. Anish Gurung,
133
Table
7.5 Landslide susceptibility
index classification
S. no
Landslide susceptibility index Susceptibility class
1
<0.62
Low
2
0.62–0.64
Medium
3
0.64–0.645
High
4
0.645–0.7309
Very high
Fig. 7.20 ROC for SIM
Fig. 7.21 ROC for LRM
Acknowledgements On behalf of all the authors, I am thankful to the Central Department of
Environmental Science, Tribhuvan University, Nepal for giving this opportunity and HI-AWARE,
ICIMOD for the technical and financial support to carry out this research. I am pleased to express my
deepest gratitude to Dr. Deo Raj Gurung, Aga Khan Development Network (AKDN), Tajikistan,
Dr. Uttam Paudel, Housing Recovery and Reconstruction Platform (HRRP) for their invaluable
guidance throughout my study. I would also like to thank Mr. Ajay Shrestha, Mr. Anish Gurung,